Home Blog Page 10

Ways of worship: Freeing ourselves from the shackles of everyday life

0
Syed Adil Ahmad, Missionary, USA
Ways of worship: Freeing ourselves from the shackles of everyday life

All of us are slaves to something. Instagram likes, shoe collections, athletes, the companies that we work for – slaves to ourselves even. As believers, we channel an intrinsic desire to humble ourselves by worshipping and submitting ourselves to the Creator of the heavens and the earth.

No one is ever actually free. There are billions of dollars poured into marketing and advertising every day, so that we can presume we bought or did something out of our own choice, when actually, we are being bought and sold by the second every waking moment.

The question is, how do we sell ourselves to Allah Almighty? Like any product that is brought into your possession when you purchase it, we need to become possessions of Allah Almighty. At every instance, the following thought must prevail in our minds, that “God owns me, and He’s watching me, and I have to answer to Him.”

The five daily prayers

One way to worship Allah, or in other words, show Allah that He owns you, is, of course, Salat – the five daily regular prayers. How great would we think we are if we had five meetings with Lebron James, Lionel Messi or Elon Musk every single day? If there was someone who met the president of the United States even just two times a day, faint whispers of jealousy and awe would follow behind them, as we relish over the opportunity to even daydream such a circumstance.

So then what about Allah, who created and brought into existence every particle around us out of nothingness? We get to meet Him five times a day. Is He not more powerful than Lebron James, Lionel Messi, Elon Musk and the president of the United States?

وَلِلّٰہِ مُلۡکُ السَّمٰوٰتِ وَالۡاَرۡضِ ؕ وَاللّٰہُ عَلٰی کُلِّ شَیۡءٍ قَدِیۡرٌ

“And to Allah belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth; and Allah has power over all things.” (Surah aal-e-Imran, Ch.3: V.190)

Do we want to be with someone who has actual power, or someone who has the illusion of power?

The Promised Messiahas stated the following:

“If even a single pious man lives in a village, then on account of that pious man and for his sake, Allah the Almighty protects that whole village from destruction. However, when destruction comes, it encompasses everyone. Nonetheless, through some way or means, God still saves His servants. It is the practice of Allah that even if a single pious person remains, others are also saved on their account.” (Malfuzat [1984], Vol. 3, p. 262)

This is the power that Allah can give us. Provided with our piety and righteousness, our single presence can protect our society.

People who are married know every single detail of their partner’s lives. They meet them every day. The more we meet Allah, the more we will know about Him, and a true slave never stops wanting to be near his master.

Worship of Allah means that we are also thankful for everything He has given us. If we are to become possessions of Allah Almighty, then we would not want to act in a way that Allah considers us impure, so as not to hold us in His merciful hand.

Profanity

One of our weaknesses is profanity. Freely throwing around curse words or partaking in futile idol talk because we want to fit in, or because we don’t want to sound too smart to not have any friends.

The Promised Messiahas has said: “Uttering profanities will foster hatred, therefore, always keep your tongue under control.” (Malfuzat [1984], Vol. 3, p. 346)

Profane language and the general lack of decent speech keep the mind at a low level. Petty fights, errant jealousies and a reactionary mindset become your character norm because of a literal inability to think at a higher level. Small words, small minds.

We can worship Allah Almighty by cleansing our speech. The cleaner our minds, the better we can absorb the greatness of Allah. You wouldn’t want to sleep in a room with a dirty carpet, so why would Allah visit you if your heart and mind are in the same state?

Allah Almighty paints various scenes of heaven in the Holy Quran. We will recline on couches, have rivers that flow underneath us, all sorts of fruits and foods, and He also says:

وَهُدُوٓاْ إِلَى ٱلطَّيِّبِ مِنَ ٱلۡقَوۡلِ 

“And they will be guided to pure speech.” (Surah al-Hajj, Ch.22: V.25)

Pure speech is a reward that Allah will give us. Profanity keeps your mind shackled, so if we clean up our speech, we can have a part of heaven on earth.

Anger

Another way to worship Allah, is to control our anger. Allah Almighty describes righteous people as the following:

الَّذِیۡنَ یُنۡفِقُوۡنَ فِی السَّرَّآءِ وَالضَّرَّآءِ وَالۡکٰظِمِیۡنَ الۡغَیۡظَ وَالۡعَافِیۡنَ عَنِ النَّاسِ ؕ وَاللّٰہُ یُحِبُّ الۡمُحۡسِنِیۡنَ

“Those who spend in prosperity and adversity, and those who suppress anger and pardon men; and Allah love those who do good.” (Surah aal-e-Imran, Ch.3: V.135)

When we get carried away with our anger, we begin to ascribe a sort of godliness to ourselves, presuming that we have the right to judge someone, get angry at them, and punish them for often trivial matters.

We cannot be like Allah Almighty in everything, but we can be merciful and forgiving. Anger is the easy path, but the reward lies in the struggle to overlook, forgive and move on. The lives of too many people, for too long a time, have been subjected to unwarranted trauma because of the anger they face, and even the anger they inflict.

Anger has the potential to destroy, but on the flipside, our mercy has the potential to build.

The Promised Messiahas has said:

“Often a battle ensues between ostentation and forbearance. At times, in contradiction to the Book of Allah, man shows anger. Upon hearing abuse, his inner self becomes incensed. Righteousness demands that one ought to suppress their anger, as stated in the Quran:

وَاِذَا مَرُّوۡا بِاللَّغۡوِ مَرُّوۡا کِرَامًا

‘And when they pass by anything vain, they pass on with dignity.’ (Surah al-Furqan, Ch.25: V.73)

“Many a time, an individual is also required to fight against impatience. This means that a person is confronted with such a multitude of difficulties whilst treading a path of righteousness that it is difficult to attain one’s objective, and thus, such a one becomes impatient. For example, if someone wanted to dig a well fifty cubits deep, but they stopped digging after a mere two or three cubits, this is mere pessimism. Now, the condition of righteousness is that one should fulfil the commandments that have been enjoined by Allah the Exalted to the end and not become impatient.” (Malfuzat [English], Vol. 1, p. 22)

Bonds of compassion

Lastly, another form of the worship of Allah is maintaining the bonds of compassion amongst ourselves.

اِنَّمَا الۡمُؤۡمِنُوۡنَ اِخۡوَۃٌ فَاَصۡلِحُوۡا بَیۡنَ اَخَوَیۡکُمۡ وَاتَّقُوا اللّٰہَ لَعَلَّکُمۡ تُرۡحَمُوۡنَ

“Sure [all] believers are brothers. So make peace between brothers, and fear Allah that mercy may be shown to you.” (Surah al-Hujurat, Ch.49: V.11)

This verse lays special stress on Islamic brotherhood. Allah Almighty has declared us in the Holy Quran as family until the end of time, which means we don’t decide who our family is; it has been decided for us.

The commentary on this verse is as follows:

“Islam tolerates no discord or dissensions between brothers. If there happens to arise a quarrel or dispute between two Muslim individuals or groups, other Muslims are bound at once to bring about reconciliation between the quarrelling parties. Islam’s real strength lies in this ideal of brotherhood which transcends all barriers of caste and color.” (Five Volume Commentary, Ch.49: V.11)

Malice and hatred for your own brother is a type of hell that we suffer from. This is one of the rewards of heaven mentioned by Allah Almighty:

وَنَزَعۡنَا مَا فِیۡ صُدُوۡرِہِمۡ مِّنۡ غِلٍّ اِخۡوَانًا عَلٰی سُرُرٍ مُّتَقٰبِلِیۡنَ

“And We shall remove whatever of rancour may be in their breasts [so that they will become] as brothers [seated] on thrones, facing one another.” (Surah al-Hijr, Ch.15: V.48)

The Promised Messiahas states:

“Our community cannot flourish until we truly have compassion for each other. We ought to use all our faculties to love those who are weak.” In other words, whatever abilities and faculties we have been granted, we should utilise those and show love to those who are weak, instead of displaying hatred or contempt.

“I often hear that when an individual sees another stumble, rather than extending him courtesy, that individual looks at him with abhorrence and disgust.”

The Promised Messiahas stated this is wrong, and further said:

“A community can only be formed when people conceal the faults of one another and treat one another like true brothers.” (Malfuzat [1984], Vol. 3, pp. 348-349)

An ideal husband during menstruation

0
Rizwan Khan, Missionary, USA
An ideal husband during menstruation

Painful menstruation is a common condition that husbands may not be able to understand. During this time, temporary frustrations can easily lead to conflicts that cause long-lasting hurt. Every couple has to navigate these monthly phases together. While a husband who thinks somewhat selfishly may dread this time of month, Islam teaches Muslims a higher ideal.

Temporary discomfort

The Holy Quran teaches consideration for wives by commanding that intercourse is forbidden during this period because of the discomfort it would cause, among other reasons. Allah Almighty says:

وَیَسۡـَٔلُوۡنَکَ عَنِ الۡمَحِیۡضِ قُلۡ ہُوَ اَذًی فَاعۡتَزِلُوا النِّسَآءَ فِی الۡمَحِیۡضِ

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IV, Mirza Tahir Ahmadrh, translates this verse in this way:

“And they ask thee concerning menstruation. Say: ‘It is indisposition, so keep away from women during menstruation,’”1

The word اَذًی means an indisposition and temporary discomfort,2 or a “state of annoyance” and a thing that hurts.3 

Painful menstruation is a common and often debilitating gynaecological condition that affects between 45% and 95% of menstruating women. Women with this condition have a significantly reduced quality of life, poorer mood and poorer sleep quality during menstruation.4

This condition is not an illness. It is a natural condition and a regular part of most women’s lives. A husband should not see it as something wrong with his wife. He should not blame her for her mood and poorer quality of life, nor should he try to fix her by being reactive during this period.  A metaphor given by the Holy Prophetsa applies here:

“Treat women nicely, for a woman is created from a rib, and the most curved portion of the rib is its upper portion, so, if you should try to straighten it, it will break.”5

Kind treatment

A husband should also not see a state of menstruation as being so unclean that he avoids his wife. Hazrat Aishara relates:

“The Messengersa of Allah would recline in my lap when I was menstruating and recite the Quran.”6

Painful menstruation affects a wife’s ability to do daily tasks in the home. If a husband is unaware of it, he can become unsympathetic. A study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology found, “Dysmenorrhea (painful menstruation) was the most common symptom, with a prevalence of 85%, followed by psychological complaints (77%), and tiredness (71%). During their menstrual period, 38% of all women reported not being able to perform all their regular daily activities.”7

During these days, a husband should contribute more towards daily household tasks. A combination of poor mood and failure to do daily tasks can create conflict on any day. During days of menstruation, these factors increase and conflict is more likely. The guidance of the Promised Messiahas is especially applicable here:

“I find it utterly shameful for a man to be in a state of conflict with a woman. God has made us men, and in reality, this is a completion of His favour upon us. The gratitude that we owe for this is to treat women with kindness and tenderness.”8

Since men do not have to go through these difficulties to have children, they should express gratitude by treating women kindly. It is precisely during this period that tenderness is needed most, and for a husband to fail to do so when his wife needs it most would be unsympathetic.

Avoiding discourteous behaviour

During menstruation, it is easy for frustrations between the couple to get out of hand. While this period is temporary, hurt feelings can have permanent effects. Islam expects the husband to show exceptional tolerance. This is indicated by the fact that, during this period, Islam teaches that he should not divorce his wife.

In Sahih Muslim, it is narrated that Hazrat Ibn Umarra divorced his wife while she was menstruating. When this was reported to the Holy Prophetsa, he commanded that he take her back and gave instructions on how divorce is to be done.9

Thus, a husband should generally not hold his wife accountable for her shortcomings during this period. If his wife does something that aggravates him so much that he decides to divorce her, he should hold his tongue. Explaining a verse of the Holy Quran which speaks about divorce, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra writes:

“Do not divorce in a state of anger. Instead, give divorce during a period of purity [outside of menstruation] in which no physical intimacy has taken place. This allows anger to subside and passion to reignite, fostering love – so that the matter of divorce does not arise at all.”10

Islam seeks to overlook the faults of the wife during this period. A husband is taught to withhold judgment and reassess after her menstruation when he is more physically and emotionally inclined to reconcile. The Promised Messiahas states, “With the exception of indecency, you ought to bear with patience all the other improprieties and discourteous behaviour of your wives.”11

Pleasure of love

Bearing with patience is the least Islam requires of us. A believer does not reluctantly do the minimum, rather, he willingly and happily does good. Islam teaches that a husband should especially show love to his wife during these days, even at the expense of his own desires.

Thus, the Holy Prophetsa continued to show physical intimacy even during menstruation, and would embrace his wife during such a time.12 This shows that his main purpose was not lust, but to show affection and comfort his wife. A man motivated by lust loses interest in intimacy during this period and becomes distant. However, the Holy Prophetsa continued to show intimacy.

This level of control shown by the Holy Prophetsa is not meant to be a sacrifice; it is meant to be a pleasure. The Holy Quran teaches that the highest good we can show to another is “giving like kindred.”13 This refers to the kind of treatment driven by natural affection, done without any thought of exchange or reciprocity.14

When a husband is intimate out of lust, he shows affection with a thought of receiving. Intimacy outside of menstruation always implies reciprocity. However, when a husband is intimate during menstruation, it is purely out of love because there is no thought of receiving.

In Islam, doing good is a pleasure in itself, and the most selfless good action brings the most refined pleasure. Giving brings more happiness than taking. Love and lust are both a part of life. In lust, there is more taking, but love is giving and has greater pleasure for those who can experience it. If a husband follows the example of the Holy Prophetsa, intimacy during menstruation can give more happiness.

A person who thinks selfishly may dread the time of month when his wife menstruates. However, a man who loves his wife can look forward to unique opportunities to express his love. These are monthly phases that every couple passes through, and Islam has taught that every part of life leads to happiness.

Endnotes

1.  Surah al-Baqarah Ch. 2: V. 223

2.  The Holy Quran – Arabic Text and English Translation, Translated by Hazrat Maulvi Sher Ali,, Surah al-Baqarah Ch. 2: V. 223, p. 36

3.  Lane’s Lexicon, Root: اذى Entry: أَذَّى

4.  What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26346058/

5.  Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab ahadith al-anbiya, Bab khalqi adama salawatullahi ‘alaihi wa dhurriyyatihi, Hadith 3331

6.  Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-haid, Bab jawazi ghasl-il-haidi ra’sa zaujiha, Hadith 301

7.  The impact of menstrual symptoms on everyday life: a survey among 42,879 women, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30885768/

8.  Malfuzat [English], Vol. 2, p. 179

9.  Sahih Muslim, Kitab at-Talaq

10.  Tafsir-e-Saghir, Surah at-Talaq, Ch. 65: V. 2, p. 752

11.  Malfuzat [English], Vol. 2, p. 178

12.  Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-haid, Bab mubasharat-il-haidi fauq-al-izaar, Hadith 293b

13.  Surah an-Nahl, Ch.16:V.91

14.  Tafsir-e-Kabir, Surah an-Nahl 16:91, Vol. 6, p. 369

Request for prayers for humanitarian work in Gaza

Dr Aziz Ahmad Hafiz, Chairman Humanity First UK
Request for prayers for humanitarian work in Gaza

Humanity First humbly requests all members of the Jamaat to offer sincere and heartfelt prayers for our dedicated teams in Gaza, all of whom are Ahmadis. 

In the past 24 hours, their situation has become critically dangerous. Bombing and shelling have occurred right outside their homes. Despite the trauma, especially for the children, they remain steadfast and continue to serve selflessly, resigned to Allah’s will. 

It is solely by the Grace of Allah and the blessed prayers of Hazrat Khalifatul Masihaa that they have been protected thus far.

Over recent weeks, among the countless signs of Allah’s divine protection, an incident stands out. Three of our brothers were walking down a street, carrying out their humanitarian duties, when, without any clear reason, one of them was suddenly compelled by an inner feeling to turn off the road. The others followed without hesitation. Mere seconds later, a powerful explosion shook the area – a bomb had struck the very spot where they had just been. Tragically, three others in that location lost their lives. It was only by Allah’s mercy that our team members were spared. 

We earnestly ask you to remember our brothers and sisters in Gaza in your daily prayers. May Allah be their Guardian, shield them from harm,  and grant them peace and relief from this ongoing terror.

Courageously teach and defend your faith: Nasirat and Lajna amila from Belgium have honour of a mulaqat with Huzoor

Courageously teach and defend your faith: Nasirat and Lajna amila from Belgium have honour of a mulaqat with Huzoor

Islamabad, Tilford, UK, 11 May 2025: A group of Nasirat-ul-Ahmadiyya and Lajna amila members from Belgium had the honour of a mulaqat with Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, at Islamabad, Tilford, UK.

The mulaqat commenced as Huzooraa graced the meeting with his presence, extending greetings and taking his seat. Hazrat Amirul Momineenaa then addressed Maryam Afzal Sahiba, Sadr Lajna Imaillah Belgium. Sadr Sahiba provided a brief introduction of the attending group. She also conveyed condolences on behalf of the Lajna Imaillah of Belgium upon the recent demise of Syed Mir Mahmood Ahmad Sahib. Following this, she sought permission for the attendees to pose questions to Huzooraa, which was graciously granted.

Guidance on language prioritisation for Jamaat events in Belgium

The first questioner sought guidance on language management for live Jamaat programmes, such as lectures or classes, in Belgium, where Dutch, French and German are spoken. She enquired which language should be prioritised alongside Urdu and how to manage translations for three or four languages simultaneously during live events.

Huzooraa enquired about the number of Lajna members in the German-speaking region, learning there were only two nasirat present there. Huzooraa observed that German is primarily spoken near the German border. He advised that Belgium’s main languages are Flemish (Dutch) and French. When events are held in the Flemish region, the translation should be provided in Flemish alongside Urdu. He noted that regions are generally demarcated and French speakers in Flemish areas usually understand enough Flemish and vice versa for Flemish speakers in French areas. Therefore, Huzooraa guided that translations should primarily be in Flemish in the Flemish region and French in the French region, alongside Urdu. He indicated that managing two languages should suffice and that creating unnecessary complexities should be avoided.

Enhancing the appeal of Jamaat literature for younger generations

A question was raised regarding how to make Jamaat literature more engaging for the new generation, particularly for nasirat and young Lajna who may not be proficient in Urdu. 

Huzooraa provided comprehensive guidance on this matter. He suggested focusing on contemporary issues and frequently asked questions that require understanding, especially religious questions pertinent to women and girls. Topics could also include the existence of God Almighty, aspects of the life of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa, the lives of the female Companions, matters concerning the Promised Messiahas and explanations provided by the various Khulafa at different times, or by Huzooraa himself.

Huzooraa advised that Lajna Imaillah should compile these selected questions and answers into booklets, books, or diaries. These compilations should then be translated into French and Flemish and printed as small textbooks. He emphasised that this is a task for Lajna, noting that there are many educated young women with fertile minds who can undertake this work. It is not necessary to translate all books immediately. The focus should be on addressing the current local issues and fundamental needs, such as the existence of God, the truth of the Holy Prophetsa and his status as Khatam an-Nabiyyin, other Islamic issues, women’s rights in Islam as elucidated by the Holy Prophetsa and the Promised Messiahas. Huzooraa mentioned that he has delivered many addresses on women’s rights, citing Quranic verses, ahadith and historical accounts, which could be translated. He also referred to the writings of the other Khulafa. Compiling these into small booklets would address approximately eighty per cent of the questions raised by the younger generation. Huzooraa encouraged the Lajna to apply their minds and work diligently on this.

Supporting nasirat students in Belgium’s diverse educational systems

Further guidance was sought on how Lajna Imaillah could better support nasirat students, considering Belgium has three distinct educational systems corresponding to its German, French and Flemish regions.

Huzooraa reiterated that the German-speaking area has a very small Jamaat presence, primarily near Aachen. The main Jamaat population resides in areas where Flemish and French are spoken. He noted that some literature is already available; for instance, material published by the Jamaat in the Netherlands could be adapted with minor adjustments for the Flemish-speaking members. French literature is also available and can be similarly adapted.

Huzooraa advised that if there are specific contemporary local issues, the Lajna office-bearers should identify them and find answers. He emphasised that answers to all questions can be found within the Jamaat resources, but it requires effort. Office-bearers are appointed to undertake this hard work, not to expect ready-made solutions. Their role is to research, prepare and provide answers to the members.

Understanding Islamic injunctions regarding stipulations and wagers

A nasirah enquired about the wisdom behind the Islamic prohibition concerning what is called “شرط لگانا” (making stipulations, conditions, or wagers and bets) in Urdu.

Huzooraa initially sought clarification on the specific type of “شرط” being questioned, thereby indicating that the term encompasses a variety of meanings. He then proceeded to elucidate the kinds of stipulations that are considered impermissible within Islamic teachings.

Firstly, Huzooraa explained that any “شرط” which constitutes gambling is unequivocally forbidden. This includes scenarios where money or items of value are staked on an uncertain outcome, resulting in one party’s gain being contingent upon another’s loss – for instance, an agreement such as, “If I win, you will pay me a specified sum, and if you emerge victorious, I shall pay you that sum or a penalty.” Such practices are deemed incorrect.

Secondly, another form of prohibited “شرط” pertains to making definitive and unconditional declarations about future occurrences. An example would be asserting with absolute certainty, “This will unquestionably happen.” Such pronouncements are discouraged because the true knowledge of future events rests exclusively with Allah the Exalted. Huzooraa highlighted that the Holy Quran directs believers to preface any statement regarding future intentions or events with the phrase “Insha-Allah” (if Allah wills) and to engage in the remembrance of Allah. (Surah al-Kahf, 18:24-25) 

In contrast to these prohibitions, Huzooraa clarified that not all conditional arrangements fall under this restriction. A “شرط” in the context of establishing a condition for receiving an incentive or a reward upon the successful completion of a commendable act is entirely permissible. He illustrated this with the example of a mother promising her child a reward conditional upon the memorisation of specific Quranic verses. Such a condition serves as a means of encouragement [targhib] and motivation towards virtuous deeds. This type of conditional offer, aimed at fostering positive actions, is not the kind of “شرط” that Islam disallows.

Therefore, the prohibition is primarily applicable to stipulations that involve elements of gambling or an arrogant claim to possess foreknowledge of events, as human beings do not have access to the knowledge of the Unseen.

Ensuring authenticity and addressing previously answered questions

During the mulaqat, in response to a question, Huzooraa enquired from the questioner whether the query was her own or if it had been provided to her by the Lajna. Upon learning it was provided by the Lajna, Huzooraa advised that previously given answers should not be repeatedly presented to children merely for the sake of filling a slot. He also stressed that girls should be allowed to write and ask their own questions, so that answers can be tailored to their specific understanding and mindset. He further instructed that it is the responsibility of the Lajna administration to find and provide previously given answers to the girls so they are aware of them and do not bring forward the same queries repeatedly.

Navigating social media usage and guiding peers

A young nasirah asked for advice on how to stay away from excessive use of social media platforms like TikTok and Snapchat, which are prevalent among her classmates and how to guide her peers in this regard.

Huzooraa advised her to inform her classmates that she prioritises her studies and chooses not to spend time on social media viewing frivolous content. Instead, she should explain that she uses her time to gain religious knowledge and focus on her academic work. She can encourage her peers to also save their time, abandon pointless activities and organise their schedules to include schoolwork, religious learning and sports for physical health. By her example of being well-adjusted and knowledgeable without constant social media engagement, she can demonstrate that it is not essential.

Huzooraa added that if the internet or television is used to watch beneficial programmes for acquiring knowledge, it is permissible. However, constantly wasting time on it is not good. It is better to use that time for religious learning and studies.

Supplication upon first sighting the Ka’bah

A question was posed regarding the acceptance of prayers made upon the first sight of the Holy Ka’bah and what specific supplication should be offered at that moment.

Huzooraa explained that the prayer offered should be what comes to one’s heart at that instant. He mentioned that Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira wrote that he had prayed, “O Allah, accept whatever prayer I make.” (Khutbat-e-Mahmud, V. 15, p. 533) This, Huzooraa noted, is a very comprehensive prayer. True prayer emanates from the heart; merely uttering memorised words does not constitute true prayer. Prayer is that which reflects the heart’s emotions. When a prayer comes from the heart, with genuine feelings, focused attention and perhaps tears, then Allah the Exalted listens. Therefore, one should pray what is truly in their heart and this will differ from person to person.

Huzooraa added that our general prayers are for Allah to grant wisdom and understanding to people worldwide, for them to turn towards Him, believe in Him, worship Him and for Islam to spread globally. When one approaches the Ka’bah with these sentiments, the first prayer that naturally arises would be for Allah to grant Islam supremacy.

The wisdom behind ‘Allahu Akbar’ in salat and its omission after ruku‘

A nasirah enquired about the wisdom in saying “Allahu Akbar” (Allah is the Greatest) before most movements in salat, but not after rising from ruku‘ (bowing).

Huzooraa explained that this is the method taught by Allah the Exalted through the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. With each takbir, the greatness of Allah is proclaimed. When one says “Sami‘allahu li mun hamidah” (Allah hears and accepts the prayer of the one who praises Him) after rising from ruku‘, this too is a declaration of Allah’s sanctity and praise. First, one bows before Allah and then, upon rising, affirms that Allah listens to those who praise Him. Thus, the glorification and greatness of Allah are being expressed here as well.

Huzooraa stated that Allah has taught us these specific supplications for different postures in salat. Upon rising from ruku‘, the believer acknowledges having bowed before Allah, proclaims His name and His sanctity, affirming that Allah hears those who praise Him and counts oneself among them by saying “Rabbana wa laka l-hamd” (Our Lord and to You belongs all praise). This method of prayer, as taught by the Holy Prophetsa, is excellent. Though the words may differ, the objective remains the same: to express Allah’s holiness and majesty.

Differences in Quranic translations regarding Hazrat Isaas

A question arose concerning the differences between Ahmadi and non-Ahmadi translations of the Holy Quran, particularly regarding the events of Hazrat Isaas (Jesus), where some translations state that Hazrat Isaas was raised to heaven alive.

Huzooraa explained that many early, prominent non-Ahmadi Muslim scholars interpreted these verses in the same way that Ahmadis do. When Allah the Exalted states, “I will exalt thee to Myself” (Surah Aal-e-‘Imran, Ch.3: V.56), it signifies an elevation in rank and status. No one can ascend to heaven with their physical body, as the Holy Quran elsewhere states that no human can go to heaven alive in a physical body.

Huzooraa pointed out the inconsistency in believing that while the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa, the greatest and most beloved Prophet of Allah, was not raised to heaven with his human body, Hazrat Isaas was and has remained there for 2000 years. This is despite the Holy Quran mentioning that Hazrat Isaas and his mother used to eat food, implying their mortal nature. (Surah al-Ma’idah, Ch.5: V.76) These are points that require understanding.

He further stated that many non-Ahmadi scholars from before the time of the Promised Messiahas understood this and translated the verses as Ahmadis do. This interpretation is not exclusive to Ahmadis; Ahmadiyya literature contains references from these earlier scholars. Allah the Exalted does not take any human being to heaven alive with their physical body. He has decreed that humans will live on this earth, die on this earth and be buried here. (Surah al-A‘raf, Ch.7: V.26) In this respect, Hazrat Isaas was not an exception. Huzooraa mentioned that even some non-Ahmadis now concede this point or try to evade the discussion. If Hazrat Isaas was to return after a thousand years, why has he not come yet? When asked this, they often give evasive answers. Christians also hold similar beliefs about Jesus’sas physical ascension.

Huzooraa advised referring to the commentaries [tafasir] of earlier scholars, which often align with the Ahmadi perspective, with only minor differences in some aspects. He suggested asking non-Ahmadis for the reasoning behind their interpretation. Huzooraa reminded the audience that the Promised Messiahas presented 30 Quranic verses proving the death of Hazrat Isaas and questioned how others would respond to this extensive evidence.

Discouraging sleepovers for children

Guidance was sought on the practice of children having sleepovers at friends’ houses. The questioner asked how to explain to friends, whose families permit sleepovers, why they themselves do not participate.

Huzooraa advised that if a friend comes for a sleepover at one’s house and any mishap or incident occurs, the blame would fall on the host family. Therefore, it is better to tell friends to sleep at their own homes, as it is best for everyone to be in their respective houses at night. Similarly, if one goes for a sleepover elsewhere and an incident occurs, it would cause distress to their own parents. If someone else’s child is staying over and an incident happens at the host’s home, the guest’s parents would raise concerns. To avoid such situations, it is better to refrain from sleepovers.

Huzooraa further remarked that in current times, many inappropriate things can happen. Thus, it is preferable not to have sleepovers. Children should stay in their own homes with their parents. He questioned the necessity or desire for sleepovers, suggesting that if they wish to spend time together and have fun, they should ask their parents and all siblings could go out together, book a chalet or a hut at a recreational spot and enjoy themselves there. What is to be gained from sleeping over at others’ houses except perhaps engaging in futile talk? It is better not to have sleepovers and to encourage others to also stay in their own homes.

If they wish to spend the day together, they can do so at each other’s houses; that is sufficient for playing and interaction. Huzooraa questioned if any significant lesson is learned by sleeping over. 

He advised telling the friend that they should sleep at their respective homes. Otherwise, what would they do at night? They might stay awake, miss their prayers, not wake up for Fajr prayer and no one would wake them. An Ahmadi Muslim has a duty to offer prayers on time and to sleep after offering prayers. By going for sleepovers, they might neglect their prayers. It is better to say that one is happy to spend the day with them but prefers not to stay overnight, without needing to mention their parents’ instructions specifically.

The significance of the seven circuits [tawaf] around the Ka’bah

A nasirah enquired about the reason for performing seven circuits around the Holy Ka’bah.

Huzooraa explained that the Holy Prophetsa performed tawaf as commanded by Allah the Exalted and the Holy Quran also enjoins it. Regarding sa‘i between Safa and Marwah, it commemorates Hazrat Hajirah’sra running between the two hills and thus that sunnah is followed. Allah the Exalted has prescribed a method of worship; by performing these rites, one demonstrates restlessness and supplication for the sake of Allah.

Similarly, circumambulating the Ka’bah seven times is a prescribed act of worship. Allah the Exalted has placed a blessing in the number seven. This means that if one performs this act of worship in the prescribed manner, Allah the Exalted will accept it. We follow the method that Allah the Exalted has taught and which the Holy Prophetsa demonstrated through his practice; therein lies the blessing.

Huzooraa added, by way of analogy, that one might then ask why we offer five daily prayers, especially when fifty were initially enjoined. If fifty prayers were still obligatory, how would one manage schooling and studies? Allah the Exalted has explained certain matters with great wisdom and we should adhere to them.

The re-creation of the world after the Day of Judgement

A question was asked whether Allah the Exalted will create the world anew after the Day of Judgement or if people will remain in Heaven and Hell eternally.

Huzooraa clarified that Allah the Exalted will not send the same people back. He has no shortage of souls to necessitate sending the same individuals again. Allah the Exalted states that the world will eventually collapse into what science terms a ‘black hole’ when Qiyamah occurs. Then, just as the universe was formed through a ‘Big Bang,’ another such event will take place and a new world will be created. How it will be formed is best known to Allah the Exalted and we do not have knowledge of its specifics.

The Holy Quran states that Allah will ‘roll up’ the universe, which corresponds to the scientific concept of a black hole. Then it states He will establish the earth anew, akin to the Big Bang theory. Allah the Exalted will create it and only He knows who its inhabitants will be. The people of the current world will have ended; they will not return to this world. Those who die are gone from this worldly existence.

Concluding remarks and directives to Lajna Imaillah Belgium

Following the question-and-answer session, Huzooraa graciously distributed pens as gifts among the attending nasirat.

Thereafter, Huzooraa provided specific guidance to Sadr Lajna Imaillah Belgium. He advised, “You should conduct more tarbiyati courses there [in Belgium]. Teach the people. Your emphasis is often on grand issues […] you should also explain smaller, everyday issues and aspects of moral training.” He further instructed, “The questions raised by these [girls], prepare their answers with the help of the missionaries, write them down and, as I mentioned, compile a small booklet.”

Sadr Sahiba Lajna submitted that, in view of the prevailing circumstances in Belgium, they had received advice to curtail some of their educational activities.

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa reassured her, stating that there was no need for apprehension or to reduce such activities. He explained that Lajna Imaillah was not operating a madrassa or full-time religious seminary but rather conducting brief classes over the weekends, an activity for which there was no legal prohibition, and therefore, they should continue. Huzooraa affirmed that their literature did not contain any teachings of terrorism; on the contrary, it solely promoted the worship of the One God and imparted the true teachings of Islam.

Consequently, Hazrat Amirul Momineenaa guided that unless a formal, direct order was issued by the government requiring them to cease, they should not halt their educational programmes. He further advised that they should be prepared to present their position clearly and assert their right to conduct such peaceful activities through appropriate and lawful channels. Huzooraa questioned the necessity for timidity or for retreating at every perceived challenge. He encouraged the Lajna members that if their men were displaying a lack of resolve, then it was upon the women to cultivate and exhibit courage in upholding their principles within the bounds of the law.

Huzooraa then sought leave and the blessed mulaqat came to its conclusion.

(Summary prepared by Al Hakam)

Remembering Mir Mahmood Ahmad Nasir Sahib

Asif M Basit, Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre

Mir Mahmood Ahmad Nasir Sahib

To write about a personality as grand as Mir Mahmood Ahmad Nasir Sahib is truly a case of a small mouth attempting grand utterance. Had this beloved and respected elder been alive today, he would have sternly stopped me from writing this piece about him; just as he would try and stop me from many things.

For instance, whenever I requested him to grace a programme for MTA, the words would barely leave my lips when, in his distinctive manner – laced with the sweetness of affection and the flavour of elderly kindness – he would immediately say, “No, no. I won’t come. Invite someone else. Do whatever you wish. I won’t participate in your programme.”

Then I would seek permission from Hazrat Sahib and inform him that Hazrat Sahib had graciously permitted him to attend the programme. At this, he would never argue further. He would gently scold me while interjecting questions: “Where is the programme? When is it? What is the duration?” And what kind of scolding was it, really? Merely saying, “You have left me no room to refuse now!”

It wasn’t just about MTA programmes. It was about any word uttered from the lips of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih. No sooner would Mir Sahib learn of it than he would begin implementing it with full vigour.

But these aspects of Mir Sahib’s personality I observed much later. I had become acquainted with him during my youth; yet even that acquaintance began with a refusal from Mir Sahib. It so happened that after completing my secondary school in Karachi, I enrolled in a college there, but then had to relocate to Rabwah. My cousin, Muzaffar Chaudhry Sahib, was studying at Jamia at that time. As I began to socialise with him and his Jamia friends, I found the atmosphere of Jamia quite appealing and developed a desire to enrol there.

I presented myself before Mir Sahib, who was then the principal, and expressed my wish. He informed me that admissions had closed and there was no possibility of enrolment. Therefore, admission was not possible. He also advised that I should complete two years in college, earn my FA, and then come, though he added that few who came this way tended to persist. “Yes, I have two or three students who came from college but did very well and succeeded in Jamia,” he said. Here he mentioned Ataul Mujeeb Rashed Sahib, Raja Munir Ahmad Khan Sahib, and Fareed Ahmad Naveed Sahib. Fareed Sahib, who is now the principal of Jamia Ghana, was then studying in the fourth year and was also the zaeem of Nasir Hostel. Raja Munir Sahib when on to become the Sadr of Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya and later the principal of the junior section of Jamia Ahmadiyya Rabwah. And Ataul Mujeeb Rashed Sahib needs no introduction.

I continued visiting Jamia. In fact, my visits increased and I made new friends. When I got the opportunity to serve with Tashheez-ul-Azhan, I would frequently visit Fuzail Ayaz Sahib, the then editor, who resided in a quarter within the Jamia premises. Thus, mornings were spent at college. Upon leaving college (bunking, rather), I would go to Khilafat Library. From there, in the scorching afternoon of Rabwah, I would head home, and as soon as noon turned into afternoon, I would be in the premises of Jamia Ahmadiyya.

I would often encounter Mir Sahib at Jamia who always treated me with great affection. I never felt offended by his refusal to enrol me at Jamia because the reason he gave was entirely justified. On the contrary, I had taken a great liking to Mir Sahib, and with time, I continued to admire him even more. On occasions when I would meet him, or if he passed by on his bicycle, he would invariably share some affectionate remark accompanied by his gentle laughter: “Who have you come to have tea with today?” “Your friend was just leaving!”

On cold winter mornings, Mir Sahib would sit in the sun in front of the beautiful Jamia building, wearing a warm coat, warm cap, and gloves, reading something. I would stop my bicycle in front of his desk, dismount, greet him, ask for prayers, and after hearing one or two affectionate phrases or prayers from him, I would go and sit at the Jamia canteen. He never stopped me. I was perhaps the only outsider who roamed freely in Jamia (or rather, strutted about). And not only did Mir Sahib never stop or rebuke me, but I myself never tried to keep my visits to Jamia discrete. I would always meet him and offer my greetings. He would treat me with great affection. Perhaps he had in mind his refusal and the sentiments of a young man. Also that how this young man, instead of taking offense at the refusal, continued to maintain and strengthen the relationship. But the young man wasn’t doing any favour. He was captivated by the charm of Mir Sahib’s personality and satisfied his heart by meeting him for his own sake.

My visits to Jamia continued in this manner and so did Mir Sahib’s love and kindness. Over the course of two years, I completed my college education. But throughout all this, much water had flowed under the bridge and my priorities had somewhat changed.

I never went back to Mir Sahib for admission, nor did Mir Sahib ever ask, however, Mir Sahib allowed this relationship of affection to be maintained. And by relationship, I mean those brief roadside encounters where he would pause to give attention to a wayward young man, bestowing upon him the grace of his kindness.

Then came the days of Punjab University, and Lahore entangled me in its web. I would reach Rabwah on Saturday nights for the weekly holiday, spend Sunday partly resting and partly wandering about, and depart for Lahore early Monday morning. I would visit Jamia occasionally, and even in those occasional visits, I would sometimes have the honour of a brief meeting with Mir Sahib in the same manner.

He would inquire about my education and my wellbeing. I would request prayers, to which Mir Sahib would always raise his index finger in any direction and say that I should write “there” for prayers. While waving his finger, Mir Sahib wouldn’t calculate east or west. But everyone knew that the needle of the compass in Mir Sahib’s heart always pointed towards the court of Khilafat.

Then I moved to England, and the series of meetings with Mir Sahib was suspended. Two years later, I had the blessing of pledging to devote my life (Waqf-e-Zindagi) and was assigned duty at MTA. The Annual Jalsa was approaching when I received instructions from Hazrat Sahib to present myself for mulaqat. When I presented myself, I was instructed that the elders coming from Rabwah for this Jalsa were not only familiar with the Jalsa’s history but had been part of the Jalsa management for many years and were acquainted with every component of the Jalsa machinery: Chaudhry Hameedullah Sahib, Mirza Khurshid Ahmad Sahib, Sahibzada Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib, and Mir Mahmood Ahmad Nasir Sahib. As I write these names, the disheartening realisation dawns that all have departed from this world. The last name departed a few days ago. Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji‘un.

I informed all these elders. All agreed. Mir Sahib clearly refused, saying, “Ask the others; they know everything. What do I have to tell? They know it all.”

I simply said, “Mir Sahib! Hazrat Sahib himself has mentioned your name.” Silence fell for a moment and then came the words: “Oh? If Hazrat Sahib has said so, then tell me where the studio is in the Jalsa Gah. When should I arrive? How long will the programme last?” and so on.

This was the first programme where I had the honour of sitting with Mir Sahib and asking him questions. This humble man, free from any desire for pomp or vanity, did not even wait for the closing of the programme. I was still saying the concluding remarks to the viewers when Mir Sahib removed his microphone and, unknowingly, passed in front of the live camera and departed. The duty assigned to him by Hazrat Khalifatul Masih had been fulfilled and after this, he did not remain seated before the camera, and left the studio.

During this Jalsa and in the days that followed, wherever Mir Sahib met me, he would tell his admirers walking with him, “He ties me up and takes me to programmes.” Then in the many years that followed, whenever I invited him to a programme and told him that Hazrat Sahib had granted approval, he would laugh and repeat that I had learned how to tie him up and take him.

Mir Sahib would always inquire about the details of the programme. For many years, he stayed in a suite attached to a guest house across from Fazl Mosque. I had the opportunity to go there multiple times to explain the details of programmes. Next to Mir Sahib’s bed was a reading desk, a chair, and a reading lamp. And on the desk, Mir Sahib’s books were neatly arranged.

Upon receiving permission, I would enter, and Mir Sahib would be reading or writing something in the lamplight. Sometimes he would share what he had been reading. And what variety there was in his subjects of interest! Primarily known as an expert on Christianity and the Bible, Mir Sahib never missed an opportunity for the acquisition of knowledge in any discipline. The Quran, Hadith and writings of the Promised Messiahas were like his universe; but alongside these, from science to current affairs, and from global politics to environmental studies – no subject remained outside his sphere of interest. Yet never once did he flaunt his scholarship. If someone like me sought guidance on any topic, he would offer it with downcast eyes and a shy, hesitant voice, with the pure intention of providing direction. These were the cracks through which those present in Mir Sahib’s company could glimpse his profound scholarship. Otherwise, Mir Sahib himself never felt that he had drunk his fill from the ocean of knowledge and could now quench the thirst of others. Whatever he hesitantly offered was intended as guidance, and never as self-display.

Mir Sahib’s writings are numerous and if collected and published, they would form several volumes. His articles were of solid scholarly nature, distilling his deep research. It was my good fortune that occasionally I would receive an instruction from Mir Sahib that a certain reference was needed, or that a reference from a particular author’s work published by a certain publisher was meant to go in his article, and that I should obtain permission from the publisher.

The first time this happened, looking at the nature of the reference and the word count, I respectfully said, “Mir Sahib, permission isn’t required for this as it falls under fair use, and citing the source would suffice.” He replied, “Very well, please convey this to me through the publisher. I don’t want to cause any difficulties for the Jamaat’s publications.”

To satisfy Mir Sahib, I spoke with the publisher by telephone and informed Mir Sahib, but he remained unconvinced. I realised that his satisfaction would not be attained in any form short of written permission from the publisher; and it wasn’t attained until the written approval was procured and sent to Mir Sahib.

The next time I received a similar request from Mir Sahib, drawing on the previous experience, I submitted that the same principle applied to this reference as it had the last time. But for Mir Sahib, even the thought of Jamaat’s newspapers and magazines – already under restrictions and prohibitions – facing additional difficulties was unbearable. Thus, he had raised the threshold of precaution.

Mir Sahib’s research articles were free from the tint of confirmation bias; he presented facts, backed them with references, and where there was opportunity to express his personal beliefs, he took full care that they were contextually appropriate. Mir Sahib has departed, but his research articles will live forever and continue to guide those who walk the paths of research and writing – especially in avoiding bias, making timely expressions of personal opinion or belief, and in the subtleties of caution regarding citations.

Mir Sahib served as principal of Jamia Ahmadiyya Rabwah for many years. Students who graduated during his tenure, who were his direct pupils, meaning he taught them lessons himself, number in the hundreds and are serving around the world. Many of them are entrusted with key responsibilities.

During his stays in London, he would write a letter to Hazrat Sahib every day, personally take it to the Private Secretary’s office to present it. Hazrat Sahib’s Private Secretary, Munir Ahmad Javed Sahib, had also been Mir Sahib’s student. As much respect as Munir Sahib showed Mir Sahib, Mir Sahib approached him with equal respect, as though Munir Sahib had been his teacher. This was certainly Mir Sahib’s humility, but even more, it was respect for those who assisted in the work of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih, which kept Mir Sahib’s heart bowed with love.

After the programme “Rah-e-Huda” began, I met Mir Sahib outside Fazl Mosque during the next Jalsa season. He greeted me very warmly, extending his hand for a handshake – an honour he rarely, if reluctantly, bestowed on anyone. Then, as if sharing a secret but in a humourful tone, said: “See, it’s good I didn’t admit you. Who knows where you would have ended up. It was written in your destiny to come near Khalifa-e-waqt, dedicate yourself, and have the opportunity to serve.”

I recalled that day fifteen or sixteen years ago when I had presented myself to Mir Sahib seeking admission. I had left disappointed after being refused, but had never turned back to complain. Mir Sahib had left no room for complaint anyway. He always met me with great affection and even overlooked my frequent visits to Jamia, never making me feel an outsider. And if he remembered that refusal for sixteen years, then on that day I became convinced that Mir Sahib had held good wishes for my desire to dedicate my life. And what he used to say about prayer, gesturing eastward and westward with his hand, “Write there” – perhaps he himself had sometimes surely prayed for me.

When Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa established the Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre and granted me the opportunity to serve in it, more avenues of contact with Mir Sahib opened. It was a new department with responsibilities around the Jamaat’s history. Hazrat Sahib, on multiple occasions, would say, “Ask Mir Sahib.” And I would ask Mir Sahib, and he would always provide guidance with great kindness. I always witnessed that Hazrat Sahib would view Mir Sahib’s opinion with great esteem and direct us to act according to his suggestion.

Much of the material related to the department’s responsibilities was scattered across various offices in Rabwah and hence, our department needed a full-time worker there. I submitted this to Hazrat Sahib, who instructed, “Tell Mir Sahib to suggest some names and then bring them to me.” I asked Mir Sahib, who suggested just one name; that only name was presented to Hazrat Sahib, and was graciously approved.

Eight years on, every day during these years, prayers for Mir Sahib have emerged from my heart, and insha-Allah, they always will. The person whose name Mir Sahib suggested proved to be a very diligent worker, quickly learning the work and implementing it meticulously.

What I learned from this was that although Hazrat Sahib had directed “suggest some names,” Mir Sahib found only one name suitable. Mir Sahib considered it a demand of honesty to suggest only what his heart testified was right – and nothing else just for the sake of it. Only that one name was presented to Khalifatul Masih, and the passage of time showed that what Mir Sahib had suggested was indeed appropriate. And after all, Allah always preserves the honour of Khalifa-e-waqt’s decisions.

Then another staff member from Rabwah was needed for a similar responsibility. This time, a very good understanding of English was an additional requirement. I submitted this to Hazrat Sahib, who again directed, “Ask Mir Sahib.” During those days, Mir Sahib had come to the UK for Jalsa. During the Jalsa days, I spotted Mir Sahib sitting in a car in Hadeeqatul Mahdi. As the moving car passed by, I raised my hand in greeting. Mir Sahib had the car stopped. Opening the door, he showed his kindness. I submitted that Hazrat Sahib had directed thus, and that I would also submit it in writing after the Jalsa. Mentioning the name he had previously suggested, he said, “For such tasks, there was only one name, which I already gave. And there are few now with English skills. But I’ll think and let you know.”

Along with this, he began to recall by name his former students skilled in English: “Mustansar Qamar is now in such-and-such department. So-and-so is here, so-and-so is there. Students don’t show keenness to learn English anymore.”

Our issue wasn’t immediately resolved then, but what gave me pleasure was that Mir Sahib hadn’t simply loaded his students with books and let them go. He was aware of everyone’s abilities and qualifications. He knew everyone’s talents and this memory hadn’t dimmed. He even knew that Hazrat Khalifatul Masih had instructed him to give suggestions, so what precautions needed to be kept in mind, and that one shouldn’t casually offer suggestions on the fly.

And speaking of Mir Sahib’s memory, I can’t help mentioning that Mir Sahib seemed to know the Jamaat’s history by heart. Not only did he know it but remembered those details that remain unrecorded in history books or are left out for various reasons.

One day I was walking with him towards the studio. Mir Sahib usually kept his gaze lowered. A young man passing by greeted Mir Sahib. After he had gone, Mir Sahib asked me, “Who was that?” I replied that his name was such-and-such. Then he asked, “Whose son is he?” Since the young man’s father had been residing in England for ages, I said, “You probably don’t know him, but his father’s name is such-and-such.” But I was astonishingly shocked when Mir Sahib laid out details of not only the young man’s father but even his grandfather in such depth that perhaps even the young man himself wouldn’t know. He shared many things about the family, and some things he suppressed under a sweet smile.

The incidents Mir Sahib related about this young man’s father were mostly from the time of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IV. And what aspect of his “Mian Tari” could Mir Sahib possibly not remember? Mir Sahib was among the true lovers of Khilafat. He had lived through the eras of four Khalifas and remained intoxicated with love for all four. He was of the same age as Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh, they had spent their childhood and gone through the stages of youth together, stayed together in London for education, and had a relationship with him that was informal before his Khilafat. And this “Mian Tari” that occasionally slipped from his tongue in private gatherings wasn’t a lack of respect but was due to that love which, transcending the boundaries of respect, had touched the heights of devotion.

Memories of those times would flock like clouds, and Mir Sahib would keep relating them, smiling with joy. I took him in my car from Fazl Mosque, and as we turned the corner of the street onto the A3 road, Mir Sahib told me that he and Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh, had travelled much on this road. Every weekend, he would come from his flat to the mosque, and we would travel in his small car (or in Mir Sahib’s words, motor) here and there, often taking this road. Then, with sorrow written across his face, he related that when Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IV’srh funeral was being taken along this same road to Islamabad for burial, and these scenes were being shown on MTA, he was strongly reminded of those times when the two of them used to travel together on this road. “It should be named Mirza Tahir Ahmad Road,” he said, letting his smile return to his face.

He remembered with great affection his time as a student in London with Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh. He remembered the names of his teachers too. Mentioning one teacher, he told that they had given him a gift of the Holy Quran, which he had received with great love and respect. He had later moved to Canada. “I don’t know if he’s still alive,” he said.

The words “I don’t know” sounded unfamiliar coming from Mir Sahib. When I took leave of his company, I left with the burden of this “I don’t know” on my heart. Mir Sahib had mentioned the teacher’s name, so much of my night was spent searching for every resident of that name in Canadian directories. It came in handy that Mir Sahib had awakened this yearning in my heart on a London evening, so that all of the night here was daytime in Canada. I called every person bearing that name, and finally found one who had been the teacher. By then, Mir Sahib must have been about 80 years old, so you can imagine what stage of life the teacher would be in.

When I mentioned the motive of my call, he couldn’t recognise either name. When I mentioned the gift of the Holy Quran, both came back to him immediately, and also that one of them had later become the head of his community. I informed him of the death of that distinguished head, and also mentioned to the other student that he was well and remembered him. That teacher also drifted into the flourishing memories of those lush green days – paths which Mir Sahib often walked upon and took others along. And thanks to that teacher-student relationship, I, who am a user of the School of Oriental and African Studies Library, became even more enamored with it.

Speaking of Mir Sahib’s love for Khilafat, the relationship that Mir Sahib held with Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra was unparalleled. Also having the honour of being his son-in-law, Mir Sahib recounted that the match with his daughter, Amatul Matin Sahiba, was arranged in London. This was when Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra had come to London for treatment in 1955 and was residing at 63 Melrose Road, adjacent to the Fazl Mosque.

WhatsApp Image 2025 05 15 at 16.15.02

Mir Sahib narrated these memories with a gentle smile, reliving those beautiful moments. He reminisced how someone had told him that Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra had summoned him. Having sought permission, he entered the room where Huzoorra was staying. Huzoorra was facing the window and looking out of it, and continued to do so. At that moment, a proposal was made and he accepted the proposal immediately.

Mir Sahib was very cautious in his choice of words when speaking of the Khulafa, and he was particularly adept at this careful selection of words. Perhaps the words “accepted the proposal” had slipped from his tongue unintentionally. He then added that who even was I to accept or not; he said that everything he had was given by Huzoor, and what greater blessing could there be than that?

Whenever I asked him about Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra, he would always begin by saying, “How can I even start to tell? It cannot be narrated. Whoever has not seen Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra, cannot even imagine the extent of his astonishingly lovable persona […]” He would start with this phrase and then be very kind to his audience and quench their thirst of the inquirer.

I have always had a special interest in Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’sra European tour of 1924. Wherever he went, wherever he stayed, and wherever he delivered speeches, I was fortunate by Allah’s grace to identify those locations. When all this was done, I sat and waited for Jalsa, meaning I waited for Mir Sahib to come to London.

The days of Jalsa arrived, and so did Mir Sahib. After the busy days of the Jalsa, I requested him to visit those places with me. Mir Sahib’s joy was overwhelming. At each site, we would pause, and speak about the significance of that place in relation to the 1924 tour. We recorded these moments because the very next day, these recordings were to be played in a programme of MTA.

We visited all the sites, and finally reached the place where the remarkable speech of that tour had been delivered at the conference of religions. Many years ago, I had learnt  from Mir Sahib that what is known in the Jamaat as the Wembley Conference actually took place not in Wembley but at the Imperial Institute.

When we reached the site where the Imperial Institute no longer exists and has been replaced with the renowned namesake college and a museum. We were just beginning to envision and visualise that great conference and the revered Musleh-e-Maud when my colleague called to inform me that a fire had broken out in the Bait-ul-Futuh.

Upon informing Mir Sahib, he immediately returned from memory lane and urged me to return to Bait-ul-Futuh as soon as possible. For the entire journey back, he was visibly concerned and kept praying that no damage happens.

The very next day, our programme was scheduled to be recorded with the same footage, in the studio of Bait-ul-Futuh. However, due to the fire, at the behest of Hazrat Sahib, preparations were swiftly made to record all programmes in the Fazl Mosque studios of MTA.

That programme was recorded there the day after the fire, and I had the privilege of sitting beside Mir Sahib and benefitting from his knowledge – an opportunity also enjoyed by millions of viewers through MTA.

I mentioned earlier that Mir Sahib was intoxicated with love for all the Khulafa, often speaking fondly of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra and also of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh. Yet I feel it is my duty to declare, as I observed, that Mir Sahib did not remain confined to any one Khalifa’s era. He was immersed in this flowing spring – this river of the Khilafat-e-Ahmadiyya – and drank wholesomely from its clear waters. My testimony might be insignificant but countless others will also testify this observation and share more details. I simply state that I have seen Mir Sahib so immersed in love for Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa, that those like myself, who claim the love for Khilafat, are simply put to shame.

Once I asked, “You must remember the childhood days of Huzoor.” He replied, “What childhood? When Huzoor turned forty and joined Ansarullah, one day we happened to walk together toward Masjid Mubarak for prayers. I said, ‘It seems like you were born just yesterday, and today you’ve joined Ansarullah?’”

Through his actions, we learned from Mir Sahib that the relationship with Khalifa-e-waqt transcends the worldly standards of time and space. The Khalifa is God’s chosen one, God’s beloved. Before him, age, experience, knowledge – all bow down at his feet.

WhatsApp Image 2025 05 15 at 16.15.02 1

Despite him being many years older than Hazrat Sahib, whenever Mir Sahib was in the company of Hazrat Sahib, he stood like a simple child, melting in devotion. And if Hazrat Sahib sat down, I saw Mir Sahib sitting at Hazrat Sahib’s feet. On many occasions, I observed that when a group photo was about to be taken, Mir Sahib would rush to sit at Hazrat Sahib’s feet. This was an expression of his belief that no matter what a person becomes in life, their true place is at the feet of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih. This was not only an expression of Mir Sahib’s faith and conviction but also a profound lesson for us.

I continued to have the opportunity of receiving spiritual nourishment from Mir Sahib during the days of Jalsa Salana UK. Then Mir Sahib’s health was not what it once was. I consider it necessary to share another matter, and obviously Mir Sahib didn’t tell me this himself.

One day, due to poor health, Mir Sahib couldn’t cross the road to offer Maghrib and Isha prayers behind Hazrat Sahib in Masjid Fazl. The next day, he submitted a written apology: “Huzoor, despite living so close, I couldn’t attend prayers at the mosque yesterday.” What he wrote further need not be disclosed as those were the heartfelt words of a devout lover of Khilafat.

20060101 111537 1

Then came the infamous coronavirus, and, unfortunately, Mir Sahib’s visits for Jalsa came to an end. May Allah bless Dr Ghulam Ahmad Farrukh Sahib who, at my request, would arrange phone calls with Mir Sahib. The day after Hazrat Sahib mentioned the late Chaudhry Hameedullah Sahib upon his death, I spoke with Mir Sahib on the phone. It’s difficult to put into words the emotions with which Mir Sahib concluded our conversation that day. He said, “Tell Hazrat Sahib that whatever he said about Chaudhry Sahib, I am an eyewitness to all those things. All that Hazrat Sahib has said is exactly as it happened. I was there when Chaudhry Sahib became Sadr Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya. When Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh expressed affectionate words about him, I saw it all with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears. Tell Huzoor that I don’t have the strength to write these days, otherwise I would have written it myself.”

There were some other words he asked me to convey to Hazrat Sahib, but they were his trust to be delivered to Hazrat Sahib alone. So I cannot betray that trust and cause distress to Mir Sahib. But those words made my heart sink. For thirty years I had heard Mir Sahib saying, “My time is now near.” But that day, although he didn’t use those exact words, they echoed in a very painful way.

My last meeting with Mir Sahib was during the Jalsa Salana days of 2019. This was the last Jalsa before the Coronavirus pandemic spread. It had only been a few months since Hazrat Sahib and the headquarters had moved to Islamabad. Islamabad was in full bloom in the English summer, and Mir Sahib was witnessing this beauty for the first time; and also for the last time.

Mir Sahib was sitting in a wheelchair, and his son Syed Muhammad Ahmad Sahib was taking him toward his residence. I stepped forward to greet him and requested Muhammad Ahmad Sahib to let me push the wheelchair. He asked Mir Sahib, who, as always, refused. And as always, compelled by my innocent insistence, he finally granted permission.

When the wheelchair reached in front of Mir Sahib’s residence, and I could go no further, I asked for permission to leave. Here Mir Sahib said something that proved to be his final words to me in person. He said, “You were so insistent on pushing the wheelchair. Make sure you come to shoulder my coffin!”

My most respected Mir Sahib! The morning you departed this world, you were buried that same evening after Asr prayers. In such a short time, what flight could have taken me to you to obey your command? I am sorry!

This Week in History: 16-22 May

A glimpse into the rich history of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat

This Week in History: 20 May 1928
Madrasa Ahmadiyya Qadian | Image: Library

16 May 1878: Munshi Gurdiyal, a teacher at the middle school in Chiniot, Punjab, published an article in Aftab-e-Punjab advocating the Samajist belief that all souls are uncreated and addressing the Promised Messiahas. In reply, on this day, the Promised Messiahas penned a decisive rebuttal that silenced the Munshi and brought the debate to an end. (Purani Tahrirein, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 2, p. 46a)

16 May 1930: During his Friday sermon on this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra commenting on the circumstances of the Muslims around the world and their opposition towards the Jamaat, said: ‘‘You [Ahmadis] should remember the following saying of the Promised Messiahas regarding them:

اے دل تو نیز خاطرِ ایناں نگاہ دار

كآخر كنند دعویٔ حُبِّ پیمبرم

“[‘O heart, be considerate towards them; For they claim to love my Prophetsa.’ (Izala-e-Auham, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 3, p. 182)]

“Since certain troubles were to come, for this reason, he stated that during the time of such calamities and turmoils, you ought to take care of these people, because, after all, they are amongst the ummah of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. Therefore, it is our duty to make every possible effort to safeguard the Holy Prophet’ssa ummah. […] It is only our Jamaat which is moving forward on the right path, and we are required to preach Ahmadiyyat to them since this is the only way to their salvation.” (Khutbat-e-Mahmud, Vol. 12, pp. 400-407)

To read more on this topic, see: ‘‘O heart, be considerate towards them’: Promised Messiah’s sympathy for Muslims’’ at www.alhakam.org (30 October 2023).

17 May 1946: On this day, two Ahmadi missionaries – Malik Ataur Rahman Sahib and Chaudhry Ataullah Sahib – reached Paris to establish the Ahmadiyya mission there. They rented a room in a hotel and commenced their respective activities. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 11, p. 12)

17 May 2013: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa inaugurated the Baitur Rahman Mosque in Vancouver, Canada, by delivering his Friday sermon from the new mosque. (‘‘Thousands attend opening of new Ahmadiyya Mosque in Vancouver’’ www.pressahmadiyya.com)

17 May 2016: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa delivered the keynote address at a special reception to mark his first-ever visit to Sweden’s capital, Stockholm. (‘‘Head of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community addresses refugee crisis during historic address in Sweden’’ www.pressahmadiyya.com)

18 May 1908: On this day, Professor Clement Lindley Wragge enjoyed the privilege of having an audience with the Promised Messiahas once again, this time with some new questions. Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa visited Professor Clement Wragge’s grave during his 2006 New Zealand tour on 7 May.

To read more about this meeting, see: ‘‘Professor Clement Wragge’s second meeting with the Promised Messiah’’ at www.alhakam.org (2 April 2021).

18 January 2014: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa inaugurated the Noor Mosque in Crawley, UK. (“New Mosque Opened by World Muslim Leader in Crawley”, www.pressahmadiyya.com)

19 May 1955: On this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra was in Zurich and sent Eid greetings to members of the Jamaat through a telegram:

“Eid Mubarak to all Ahmadis of Pakistan, India, and around the world. I pray for the removal of their worries and problems and for their spiritual progress.” (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 16, p. 515)

19 May 1989: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh delivered his Friday sermon at the Mahmud Mosque of Zurich, in which he highlighted the schemes employed by some Baháʼís in Pakistan to undermine the faith of some economically disadvantaged Ahmadis, enticing them with financial incentives and the allure of material benefits, in an attempt to sway their allegiance away from Islam Ahmadiyyat. Huzoorrh emphatically stated that, despite their economic hardships, Ahmadis possess a resolute and unwavering faith, rendering these tactics ineffective. (Khutbat-e-Tahir, Vol. 8, p. 323)

20 May 1891: The Promised Messiahas addressed the Christian missionaries in an ishtihar, on this day, and mentioned the death of Jesusas (Majmu‘ah-e-Ishtiharat, 2019, Vol. 1, p. 242)

To read more on this topic, see: ‘‘The tomb of Jesus in Kashmir: The Promised Messiah, Rev. Weitbrecht and Christian press’’ at www.alhakam.org (30 November 2024).

20 May 1928: Madrasa Ahmadiyya in Qadian gained the status of an Arabic college. Now known as Jamia Ahmadiyya, this prestigious institution’s branches are established today in more than a dozen countries of five continents since its humble beginning. On this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra inaugurated this new institution with a powerful speech. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 5, p. 21)

21 May 1948: When Israel was established on 14 May 1948, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra wrote an article to awaken the Muslim world, titled “Al-Kufru Millatun Wahidah” and called on all Muslims to unite as one. This article was published on this day in Al Fazl.

For more details, see “The Ahmadiyya Khilafat’s call for Muslim unity: The solution to the Israel-Palestine issue” at alhakam.org (21 May 2021, p. 21).

22 May 1893: A debate that took place between the Promised Messiahas (representing Islam) and Abdullah Atham (Christianity) started on this day and continued until 5 June 1893. Huzooras had mentioned that he spent those days like a warrior, giving precedence to this historic debate and ignoring everything else, at times even meals. This debate was titled Jang-e-Muqaddas (The Holy War). (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 1, p. 484)

To read more on this topic, see: ‘‘The Messiah’s clash with Christendom’’ at www.alhakam.org (20 March 2020).

22 May 1948: On this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra issued a written message under the title “Mujhey ap ki talash hei” (I am in search of you).

For the English rendering of this text, see: “I need you” at www.alhakam.org (14 February 2020, p. 6).

Previous week: 9-15 May

Next week: 23 – 29 May

Through the eyes of a new convert: The significance of prayer

Through the eyes of a new convert: The significance of prayer

Indian press

The Indian press has done its duty in condemning unreservedly the most brutal and inhuman action of the Government of Afghanistan in stoning to death two of our brothers solely on the ground of differences of religious views.

The Pioneer, The Englishman, The Statesman, The Bengali, Amrit Bazar Patrika, The Civil and Military Gazette, The Leader, The Theosophist, New India, Young India, Moslem Outlook, Comrade, Hamdard, Paigam-i-Sulh, Prakash, Pratab, Kesri, Arya Gazette, Tej, Oudh Akhbar, Success, Jeevantat, Al Fazl, Al Hakam, and Noor are some amongst a host of dailies, weeklies, and monthlies which have with one voice disapproved of this inhuman action of the Afghan Government.

Public men of different shades of religious and political opinion and thought are equally vehement in condemning it. But there has ever existed on this earth of ours a section of humanity who are the sworn enemies of all progress, civilisation, and humanitarianism. They are the self-styled ulema, the notorious pharisees and scribes of our times. They have disgraced Islam in the eyes of the civilised world by proclaiming that, according to Islamic law, anyone who abjures Islam forfeits his life.

Islam countenances no such law. It stands for perfect freedom of conscience. We congratulate Mr Muhammad Ali for the bold stand he has made against these ulema. 

Islam in America

“Since being appointed imam and missioner in July 1922, I have gained over 200 confessions to the faith of Islam in the city of St. Louis, Mo., alone, 32 from Americans in the United States, and 6 from foreign countries. I have published and distributed 1000 books, circulars, leaflets, etc., on Islam, and gained over 500 sympathetic friends and admirers. Our mission in St. Louis has been self-supported from the very start.

“I have had to face various kinds of difficulties. Allah is my protector and prayer is my comfort. Difficulties only make me more determined. My reward is with Allah, Al-Azeez, Al-Hakeem. The prayers of friends are solicited that I might further succeed.” –  Sheik Ahmad Din (Mr Mott), St. Louis, Mo., USA. 

Eid in Putney

In glorious weather on the smooth and beautiful green lawns of the Mosque, 63, Melrose Road, Putney, the members of the Ahmadiyya Community in London celebrated the Eid-ul-Fitr (Festival of the breaking of fast) on Saturday, 25 April [1925].

The visitors represented various countries, colours, and creeds, and included, among other notable persons, Dr Leon PhD, Major Thomas, and Colonel Douglas, the late Chief Commissioner of the Andaman Islands. 

The service was led by the imam of the Mosque, the reverend Maulvi AR Dard[ra] MA. After the service was over a very learned and erudite address was given by the imam, in which he explained with clarity and lucidity the special features and significance of this festival.

At 1:30 the guests had their lunch, which included Indian dishes. At 3:30pm Maulvi Ghulam Farid Malik[ra] MA delivered a highly interesting and educative lecture on The Holy Prophet Muhammad[sa] in the Bible. The speaker quoted many verses of the Bible, with special reference to Daniel, Deuteronomy, and Matthew containing prophecies about the advent of a Master Prophet, which saw their fulfilment in the person of the Holy Prophet[sa] of Islam.  After the lecture, Colonel Douglas gave an address, and then the big gathering dispersed, some leaving straight away and taking with them the vivid and lingering impressions of a beautiful ceremony, and some remaining to enjoy the day to its end. The occasion was a great success.  – The Wandsworth Borough News

A new convert’s view on the significance of Prayer

After two years’ experience as a convert to the fold of Islam – the religion of humanity – with the Holy Quran as the guide for mankind, the following is my impression of the significance of the Muslim Prayer.

At the time of prayer, each one should be pure in mind and body. The Muslim Prayer embodies all modes of adoration and is an aggregate of all forms of physical and spiritual worship. 

1. The genuflexion shows that, seeing the greatness of God, one bends oneself down, being wonder-struck, and stands afterwards in excessive humility. 

2. Prostration is perfect obeisance, and shows extreme nearness and humility. 

3. Sitting implies securing honour and respect bestowed by God, showing that He has accepted the supplication and given permission to sit down. 

4. Lastly, salutation refers to the return from this spiritual journey to ordinary life.

The fact most worth noticing is that the worshipper has all the while to regard himself as standing in the Divine Presence. He begins his praise and thanksgiving in the third person, which is most appropriate. Then, pleased with his adoring words, when Allah seems to reveal Himself to him, he directly pleads to Him his incapacity as an adorer, his helplessness, and his need for guidance. Then he utters verses from the Holy Quran – mankind’s final testament – which are the exact, unerring, unaltered, and untarnished words of Allah, and therefore, it may be said, he seems to hear God Himself speaking to him. Realising the truth, he bends under awe, admiration, and love. Not knowing how he can do justice to the greatness of Allah, he rises in humility. He cannot stand long, but, considering His infinite greatness and his own insignificance, prostrates himself almost to become dust. Pleased with his humility, God seems to say, “Get up, my loving supplicant, and weep not,” and raises him up. Amazed with the infinite goodness of the Great God, he cannot help making a second prostration. 

No other religion on this earth can come up to it.  – AES Mondezie, Trinidad.

(Transcribed and edited by Al Hakam from the original English, published in the May 1925 issue of The Review of Religions)

An incident of Hazrat Sheikh Abdul-Qadir Jilani (rh) related to truthfulness

There is an account narrated about Syed Abdul-Qadir Jilani, may Allah have mercy on him, that when he set out away from home for the purpose of his education, his noble mother sewed his share of eighty coins into the underarm of his shirt and advised him: ‘Son, do not lie.’ When Syed Abdul-Qadirrh departed, on the first day of his journey he passed through a jungle that was inhabited by a large band of thieves and robbers. A party of robbers confronted and apprehended him. The robbers asked: ‘What have you in your possession?’ Syed Abdul-Qadirrh thought to himself that he was being tested in the first stage of his journey; he reflected over his mother’s advice and said: ‘I have eighty coins which my noble mother has sewn into the underarm of my shirt.’ The robbers were extremely surprised on hearing this and said: ‘What is this dervish saying! We have never seen such a righteous man!’ They took him and putting him before their chief, related the entire story. When the chief questioned him, Syed Abdul-Qadir Jilanirh gave the same response. Finally, when his shirt was torn at the place that he had described, it turned out that there were indeed eighty coins sewn into his shirt. All the robbers were astonished and the chief asked why Syed Abdul-Qadirrh had told them the truth. At this, Syed Abdul-Qadir Jilanirh mentioned the advice that his mother had given him before he departed. He said: ‘I have set out as a student of religion. If I had told a lie at the very first stage of my journey, what could I ex- pect to attain? And so, I chose to stand by the truth.’ When Syed Abdul-Qadirrh said these words, the chief burst into tears, fell at his feet and repented for his sins. It is said that this chief was the first follower of Syed Abdul-Qadir Jilanirh.

In short, truth is a thing that delivers a person in even the most trying and difficult of times. Sa’di is true when he says:

كس‭ ‬ندىدم‭ ‬كہ‭ ‬گم‭ ‬شد‭ ‬از‭ ‬رہ‭ ‬راست

Never have I seen go astray the one who treads the right path.

Therefore, the more a person adopts the truth and develops a love for the truth, the deeper a love and understanding they develop for the Word of God and also for His Prophets, because they are an example and source for all those who are truthful. This principle is also prevalent in the following instruction:

كُوۡنُوۡا‭ ‬مَعَ‭ ‬الصّٰدِقِىۡنَ

Be with the truthful.

(Malfuzat [English], Vol. 2, pp. 84-85)

Tahayyat-ul-Masijd

0

عَنْ أَبِي قَتَادَةَ السَّلَمِيِّ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ:‏ ‏إِذَا دَخَلَ أَحَدُكُمُ الْمَسْجِدَ فَلْيَرْكَعْ رَكْعَتَيْنِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَجْلِسَ‏‏.‏

Hazrat Abu Qatada Al-Salamira narrates that Allah’s Messengersa said, “Whenever one of you enters the mosque, let him perform two rak‘ahs before sitting down.”

(Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab as-salah, Bab idha dakhala l-masjida fa-l-yarka‘ rak‘atayn, Hadith 444)

Friday Sermon – Muhammad (sa): The great exemplar (18 April 2025)

Friday Sermon

18 April 2025

Muhammadsa: The great exemplar

Friday Sermon

After reciting the tashahhud, ta‘awwuz, and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

Today, I will mention some expeditions and battles from the life of the Holy Prophetsa. In history, we find mention of the Expedition of Hazrat Umar bin Khattabra towards Turabah. This expedition took place in Sha’ban 7 AH. The Holy Prophetsa sent Hazrat Umar bin Khattabra to the tribe of Hawazin in Turabah. Turabah is located approximately 333 miles from Medina, on the main road towards Thana and Najran. The Holy Prophetsa sent Hazrat Umarra there along with 30 individuals.

The reason for dispatching this expedition was that the Holy Prophetsa had received news of the people of Turabah scheming against Islam. (Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 2, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, pp. 89-90; Ghazwat Wa Saraya, Fareediyah Publishers, Sahiwal, p. 391)

Hazrat Umarra set off and he had an individual from the Banu Hilal with him as a guide. The Companions would travel by night and hide by day. When the people of Turabah came to know of this, they fled from there. Hazrat Umarra reached the area, but there was no one there. In fact, they had climbed up hills and mountains. However, their possessions and livestock were left behind, which they seized since they were mischievous people.

Having seized their possessions, they returned to Medina. When they reached Dhu al-Jadar, a pasturing ground in the surroundings of Quba and approximately six or seven miles from Medina, the individual from the Banu Hilal said to Hazrat Umarra: “Would you attack another group from the Banu Khasam? They have settled here due to famine in their area.” Hazrat Umarra replied: “The Holy Prophetsa has not instructed me to do so. He merely instructed me to go to Turabah and fight [the tribe of] Hawazin.” Following this, Hazrat Umarra returned to Medina. (Sharh al-Zurqani ‘ala al-Mawahib al-Laduniyyah, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, pp. 304-305; Furhang-e-Sirat, Zawar Academy, p. 85)

This is because the [people of Hawazin] were mischievous people. The allegation is raised that Muslims would attack [others] without any reason. This proves such allegations as false.

Then, there is the Expedition of Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra towards Banu Murrah in Fadak. This expedition took place in Sha’ban 7 AH under the leadership of Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra. The filial appellation of Hazrat Bashirra was Abu Nu’man, and Sa‘d bin Tha’labah was his father. He belonged to the tribe of Khazraj. Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra knew how to write during the age of ignorance. During this age, very few individuals in Arabia knew how to write. He became a Muslim during the Second Pledge at ‘Aqabah, which another 70 Ansar [Muslims native to Medina] participated in. He participated alongside the Holy Prophetsa in the Battles of Badr, Uhud, the Ditch and all other battles.

Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra was the first among the Ansar to pledge initiation at the hands of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiqra on the day of Saqifah Banu Sa’idah. During the Khilafat of Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiqra, in 12 AH, Hazrat Bashirra took part in the battle led by Hazrat Khalid bin Walidra, ‘Ain al-Tamr, and was martyred. (Sharh al-Zurqani ‘ala al-Mawahib al-Laduniyyah, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1996, pp. 305-306; Al-Istiab, Vol. 1, [Beirut: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah], pp. 252-253)

The details of ‘Ain al-Tamr are that it is a place near Kufa. The Muslims conquered it during the Khilafat of Hazrat Abu Bakrra, in 12 AH. (Mu’jam-ul-Buldan, Vol. 4, p. 199)

In any case, the details of the expedition mentioned earlier are as follows:

The Holy Prophetsa sent Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra along with 30 individuals to the Banu Murrah in Fadak.

Fadak is located near Khaibar, at a distance of six nights’ journey from Medina. As has already been mentioned earlier, it should be clear that the Holy Prophetsa would dispatch expeditions or send Companions for battle only when there was news that people were plotting against Islam. In any case, the Companions set out and, upon meeting some shepherds, enquired about the Banu Murrah. The shepherds informed them that the Banu Murrah were in their valley and had not come to the spring. The Companions then drove off their sheep and goats and set out to return to Medina.

A crier from the Banu Murrah raised his voice and announced that the Muslims had taken their belongings. The news of this incident spread. During the night, the Muslims were confronted by a large army of the Banu Murrah. The Banu Murrah returned and launched an attack on the Muslims with a huge force. The Companions spent the entire night engaged in archery until they ran out of arrows. At dawn, the Banu Murrah launched another attack and martyred the Companions of Hazrat Bashirra. Hazrat Bashirra fought them fiercely until he was wounded and fell. He sustained an injury to his ankle, and it was assumed that he had died.

The Banu Murrah then took their sheep and goats and returned, reclaiming the goods the Muslims had taken by martyring them. Hazrat Bashirra lay among the martyrs until nightfall. He mustered the strength to get up and made his way to Fadak, where he stayed with the Jews for a few days. Once his wounds healed, he returned to Medina. (Sharh al-Zurqani ‘ala al-Mawahib al-Laduniyyah, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1996, pp. 305-306; Furhang-e-Sirat, Zawar Academy, p. 225; Dairah-e-Ma’arif, Vol. 8, Bazm Iqbal Lahore, p. 225)

Next is the mention of an expedition led by Hazrat Ghalib bin Abdillah al-Laithira towards Maifa’ah. This expedition took place in Ramadan of 7 AH. (Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad, Vol. 6, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 133)

Hazrat Ghalib bin Abdillah al-Laithira was from among the people of Hijaz. He was present at the time of the Conquest of Mecca, and the Holy Prophetsa had sent him ahead as a scout before the conquest. During the era of Amir Mu‘awiyah, he served as the governor of Khurasan. According to one narration, he also participated in the Battle of Qadisiyyah. (Usd al-Ghabah, Vol. 4, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 321; Al-Isabah Fi Tamyiz Al-Sahabah, Vol. 5, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 243)

Ibn Sa‘d has written that the Holy Prophetsa sent Hazrat Ghalibra towards the tribes of Banu ‘Awal and Banu ‘Abd bin Tha‘labah, who were residing in Maifa‘ah. This place was located 96 miles from Medina, in the direction of Najd. The Banu ‘Awal and Banu ‘Abd had begun spreading negative propaganda against the Muslims and were gathering people with the intention of launching another campaign similar to the Arab Confederates (Ahzab). They were planning an attack on the Muslims.

Ibn Hisham has described this expedition of Hazrat Ghalib bin Abdullah al-Laithira towards the Banu Murrah, who were allies of the tribe of Huraqah. Imam Bukhari, in reference to this expedition, has titled a chapter:

بَعْثُ النَّبِیّ صلى الله عليه وسلم أُسَامَۃَ بْنَ زَیْدٍ أِلَی الْحُرُقَاتِ مِنْ جُھَیْنَۃَ

“The Prophetsa sending Usamah bin Zaidra to the Huraqat tribes of Juhainah.”

This gives the impression that the commander of the expedition was Hazrat Usamah bin Zaidra. However, the commentator of Bukhari, Allamah Ibn Hajar, writes in his commentary that Usamah bin Zaid’sra statement – ‘The Messengersa of Allah sent us to the tribe of Huraqah’ – does not serve as evidence that he was the commander of the expedition. Furthermore, it is not proven that Usamah bin Zaidra was ever appointed as the commander of an army before his father Zaidra was martyred in the Battle of Mu’tah. Hence, it is not established that he was appointed as commander at that time. Therefore, the opinion of the scholars of Maghazi [early Islamic military campaigns] is more reliable, superior, and acceptable – that the commander of this expedition was Hazrat Ghalib bin Abdillah al-Laithira.

In any case, the Holy Prophetsa sent Hazrat Ghalibra with 130 Companions. The freed slave of the Holy Prophetsa, Hazrat Yasaarra, was the guide for the Muslims. The Muslims launched a sudden attack and reached all the way to their valleys. Whoever stood up from among them to fight was killed, and the spoils of war, including sheep and goats, were brought back, but no one was taken as a prisoner. (Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 2, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 91; Furhang-e-Sirat, Zawar Academy, p. 56; Ghazwat Wa Saraya, Fareediyah Publishers, Sahiwal, p. 396; Al-Sirah Al-Nabawiyyah, ibn Hisham, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 879; Fath al-Bari, Vol. 7, Aram Bagh Karachi, p. 659; Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-maghazi)

Ibn Sa‘d has recorded that this was the same expedition in which Hazrat Usamah bin Zaidra killed Mirdas bin Nuhaiq, even though he had recited “La ilaha illAllah” [there is no god except Allah]. (Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad, Vol. 6, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, pp. 133 and 140; Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 2, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 91)

In Sahih al-Bukhari, this incident is described in the following manner: Hazrat Usamah bin Zaidra related that the Holy Prophetsa had sent him towards the tribe of Huraqah. [He says] “We attacked in the morning and defeated them. One of the Companions from Medina and I chased a man. When we caught him, the man said, ‘There is no god but Allah.’ The Companion from Medina stopped, but I struck him with my spear and killed him. When we returned, and the Holy Prophetsa was informed of what had happened, he asked, ‘O Usamah, did you kill him after he said “there is no god but Allah?”’ I replied that the man was only trying to save himself. But the Holy Prophetsa kept repeating it. (He repeated it many times, that “Did you kill him?”) I began to wish I had not accepted Islam before that day.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Kitab al-aghazi, Hadith 4269)

Sahih Muslim has also narrated this with the following words:

أَفَلَا شَقَقْتَ عَنْ قَلْبِهِ حَتّٰى تَعْلَمَ أَقَالَهَا أَمْ لَا؟

“Why did you not cut open his heart to know whether he said it from his heart or not?” The Holy Prophetsa continued to repeat this in front of me, until I wished I had embraced Islam only today.” (Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-iman [Translation], Vol. 1, p. 88)

But today’s clerics seem to think they have cut open the hearts of Ahmadis, and peered inside, which is why they deem it permissible to martyr and persecute them. May Allah the Almighty bring them to justice.

Another narration mentions that the Holy Prophetsa ordered that blood money be paid to the family of Mirdas, and that their wealth be returned. (Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad, Vol. 6, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 193)

Even though he was fighting against them, the Holy Prophetsa said that because he had eventually uttered “there is no god but Allah”, his family should be given his blood money and his wealth should be returned.

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra also mentioned this incident. He writes:

“The Holy Prophetsa always instructed that the enforcement of Islamic law should be apparent, meaning it should be enforced based in a clear and apparent fashion, because we don’t know the condition of one’s heart.

Once, some Companions were on a military expedition. On the way, they came across an idolater who was hiding in the wilderness. And whenever he found a Muslim alone, he would attack and kill him. Hazrat Usamah bin Zaidra chased this man and eventually caught him. He raised his sword to strike. When the idolater saw that he had been captured, he said, ‘There is no god but Allah’, indicating that he now considered himself a Muslim. However, Hazrat Usamahra did not care for his words, and killed him.

When a man reached Medina to inform the Holy Prophetsa about the expedition, he also reported this incident while reporting all of the incidents of the battle. Upon this, the Holy Prophetsa summoned Hazrat Usamahra and asked him, ‘Did you kill that man?’ He answered, ‘Yes.’ The Holy Prophetsa replied, ‘What will you do on the Day of Judgement when the words “There is none worthy of worship except Allah’ bear witness against you?”’”

As I mentioned before, the clerics in Pakistan and their blind followers talk about going to Paradise – that if you murder Ahmadi Muslims, you will enter paradise. But they are oblivious to the fact that these very actions of theirs are incurring the wrath of God Almighty. At one point or another, God will certainly seize them. In any case, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra describes this incident, stating, “the fact that God Almighty will ask why it is that even after the man proclaimed the words ‘there is no God but Allah,’ why did you kill him? Though he was fighting you, he had expressed repentance.

Hazrat Usamahra tried to explain several times, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, he was only claiming to believe out of fear.’ To this, the Messengersa of Allah replied, ‘Did you cut open his heart and look inside to see if he was lying or not?’ After this, the Holy Prophetsa went on continuously repeating, ‘On the Day of Judgement, what answer will you give when his proclamation of faith is presented before you?’ Hazrat Usamahra narrates that ‘In that moment, I wished that I had only just become a Muslim today so that I would not have been able to make such a grave mistake.’” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 415-416)

Then, there is also the expedition of Bashir bin Sa‘dra towards Yumn and Jabar; this took place in Shawwal 7 AH. Yumn and Jabar are situated between Fadak and the Valley of Qura in Khaibar in the region of the Banu Ghatafan.

The Holy Prophetsa received information that a group from the Ghatafan was gathering against the Holy Prophetsa, and that ‘Uyainah bin Hisn had vowed to support them in this cause. (Sharah Zarqaani Alal Mawahib, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 310; Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, pp. 402-403)

When the Messengersa of Allah mentioned this to Hazrat Abu Bakrra and Hazrat Umarra, they suggested sending Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra. (Imta’ul Asma, Vol. 1, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 330)

The Holy Prophetsa summoned Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra, instructed that a flag be prepared for him, and sent him along with a group of 300 Companions.

This group would travel by night and remain hidden by day until finally they reached the place called Jabar. The shepherds were tending to their flock at the time. Seeing the Muslims there, the shepherds fled and informed the other members of Ghatafan. Abandoning their belongings and cattle, these people fled and took to the higher elevations of the area. They left everything and ran. Only two of them were caught and captured. The Companions took the abandoned possessions and cattle of the tribe into their possession and returned to Medina along with their captives. When both captives became Muslims, the Holy Prophetsa allowed them to return to their region. (Sirat al-Halabiya, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 264; Sirat Encyclopaedia, Vol. 8. Darussalam p. 514)

The details of “Umrat al-Qada” has been recorded as follows: The Holy Prophetsa performed ‘Umrah in Dhu al-Qa’dah 7 AH, on February 629 CE. In the month of Dhu al-Qa’dah in 7 AH, the Holy Prophetsa left for ‘Umrah. This was the same month in which, just one year ago, the idolaters of Mecca had refused to allow the Holy Prophetsa to perform the ‘Umrah, and the Holy Prophetsa had turned back from the place known as Hudaibiyah. Thus, the Holy Prophetsa embarked on this journey for the purpose of performing “Umrat al-Qada”.

The Commentator of Bukhari, Allamah Ibn Hajar, has recorded various names for this. Ghazwat al-Qada’, ‘Umrat al-Qadiyyah, ‘Umrat-ul-Sulh and ‘Umrat al-Qisas. This ‘Umrah is even called “Ghazwat al-Amn.” It’s called ‘Umrat al-Qisas because in 6 AH, during the sacred month of Dhu al-Qa’dah, the idolaters of Mecca prohibited the Holy Prophetsa from performing the ‘Umrah. And so, it was a recompense for the previous [intention of performing] ‘Umrah that the Messengersa of Allah embarked on this journey and, in Dhu al-Qa’dah 7 AH, entered the Sacred Mosque.

Hazrat Ibn Abbasra states that on this occasion, the following verse [of the Quran] was revealed:

اَلشَّہۡرُ الۡحَرَامُ بِالشَّہۡرِ الۡحَرَامِ وَ الۡحُرُمٰتُ قِصَاصٌ

That is, “The violation of a Sacred Month should be retaliated in the Sacred Month; and for all sacred things there is the law of retaliation.” [2:195]

Ibn Hisham has stated that in Medina , the Holy Prophetsa appointed Hazrat Uwaif bin Adbat Dailamira as deputy, while according to Ibn Sa‘d, Hazrat Abu Ruhm Ghifarira was appointed to this position.

The details of the journey for ‘Umrah are narrated as follows: On this ‘Umrah, the Holy Prophetsa was accompanied by two thousand Companions. At the time of departure, the Holy Prophetsa announced that everyone who had been present at Hudaibiyah should participate. All the Companions who were present at Hudaibiyah joined the Holy Prophetsa for this ‘Umrah, except those who had been martyred during the battle of Khaibar or had passed away. Besides them, several Companions who had not been present at Hudaibiyah also joined him. The Holy Prophetsa took sixty sacrificial camels, adorning their necks with garlands and appointing Hazrat Najiyah bin Jundubra to oversee them.

When the Holy Prophetsa reached Dhu al-Hulaifah, a village approximately six to seven miles from Medina, he dispatched a hundred horsemen ahead as a precautionary measure under the command of Hazrat Muhammad bin Maslamahra. On this journey, the Holy Prophetsa also carried helmets, weapons, armour and spears, sending them ahead under the supervision of Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra. (Sirat ibn Hisham, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 717; Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 2, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 91, Vol. 3, p. 403; Sirat Khataman Nabiyyeen, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra MAra, p. 838; Fath al-Bari, Vol. 7, Aram Bagh Karachi, p. 636; Sirat al-Halabiya, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 90; Furhang-e-Sirat, Zawar Academy, p. 105)

Here, the question arises: what was the need to carry weapons during ‘Umrah, given that a treaty was already in place? The Holy Prophetsa was reminded that the Quraish had prohibited all weapons except sheathed swords. In response, the Holy Prophetsa clarified that they would not enter the sacred precincts armed; the weapons would remain close by outside Mecca as a precaution against possible betrayal since the Quraish could not be trusted. They could attack at any opportunity. When Muhammad bin Maslamahra and his horsemen reached Marr al-Zahran, they encountered some individuals from the Quraish and informed them that the Holy Prophetsa would arrive at that place the following day. These people informed the rest of the Quraish about this, who became fearful upon hearing this news.

When the Holy Prophetsa arrived at Marr al-Zahran, he sent all weapons to Yajaj, a place about eight miles from Mecca. Upon learning that the Holy Prophetsa was coming to Mecca with weapons and supplies for war, the Meccan disbelievers became greatly alarmed and sent a delegation to investigate in Marr al-Zahran.

Mikraz bin Hafs, the representative [of the Quraish], addressed the Holy Prophetsa, saying, “O Muhammad [peace be upon him], we have never known you to break a covenant.” The Holy Prophetsa reassured him, saying, “We will enter Mecca unarmed, as stipulated by our agreement.” Hearing this, the disbelievers felt reassured. Mikraz then remarked, “This is precisely why we consider you a paragon of virtue and faithfulness.” Even though he was a disbeliever, he acknowledged this.

The Holy Prophetsa appointed a group of Companions under Hazrat Bashir bin Sa‘dra to guard the weapons, and according to the treaty, only swords were carried into Mecca. Accompanied by his Companions, the Holy Prophetsa proceeded toward the Haram, reciting the Talbiyah [a prayer recited by Muslim pilgrims or those performing ‘Umrah]. The sacrificial animals were sent towards Dhi Tuwa, a valley half a mile from the Sacred Mosque. The Holy Prophetsa entered Mecca mounted on his camel, Qaswa, approaching from the direction of Hajoon, which is a mountain near the valley of Muhassab, about one and a half miles from the Ka’bah. (Sirat al-Halabiya, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, pp. 90-91; Furhang-e-Sirat, Zawar Academy, pp. 105 and 180; Dairah-e-Ma’arif, Vol. 8, Bazm Iqbal Lahore, pp. 485-487; Mu’jam-ul-Buldan, Al-Faisal Urdu Bazar Lahore, p. 357)

Hazrat Anasra narrates that during this Umrat al-Qada, the Holy Prophetsa entered Mecca while Hazrat Abdullah bin Rawahahra walked ahead of him, saying: “O descendants of disbelievers, clear the way for the Holy Prophetsa. Today, we shall strike you such blows that will sever heads and cause friends to forget each other.” Hazrat Umarra rebuked him, saying, “O Ibn Rawahah, how can you recite such poetry in the Holy Prophet’ssa presence and within the sacred precincts. This is wrong.” The Holy Prophetsa intervened, saying, “O Umar, leave him be; his words pierce them deeper than arrows.” (Jami‘ at-Tirmidhi, Abwab-ul-Adab, Hadith 2847)

This was according to one narration.

Another narration mentions that when Hazrat Umarra attempted to stop Abdullah bin Rawahahra, the Holy Prophetsa said, “O Umar, I am listening to what he is saying.” Hazrat Umarra then became silent, and the Holy Prophetsa instructed Abdullah bin Rawahahra that instead of making such provocative statements, he should recite:

لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا اللّٰهُ وَحْدَهٗ نَصَرَ عَبْدَهٗ وَأَعَزَّ جُنْدَهٗ وَهَزَمَ الْأَحْزَابَ وَحْدَهٗ

“There is none worthy of worship except Allah, He is alone, He helped His servant, and granted honour to his army, and defeated all factions on His own.” (Sharh al-Zurqani, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 320)

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has described this event in his own words, stating, “Upon reaching Marr al-Zahran, located one stop away from Mecca, the Holy Prophetsa gathered all heavy weaponry and armour there as stipulated by the treaty, entering Mecca only with sheathed swords along with his Companions. The return of migrants to Mecca after seven years of exile was no small matter. Their hearts bled recalling the prolonged persecution they endured in Mecca, while simultaneously rejoicing at God Almighty’s grace in granting them the opportunity to perform Tawaf [circumambulation] of the Ka‘bah once again. The people of Mecca watched from mountain peaks as the Muslims approached, who desired to demonstrate that it was God Who had enabled their return to Mecca. Abdullah bin Rawahahra began reciting wartime poetry, but the Holy Prophetsa stopped him, instructing instead to proclaim, ‘There is none worthy of worship except God, Who alone aided His Messenger, elevated the believers from humiliation, and dispersed their enemies from before them.’” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 329)

Hazrat Ibn Abi Aufara reports that whilst the Holy Prophetsa was performing this ‘Umrah, the Companions guarded him against potential harm by the young idolaters of Mecca. In other words, they were protecting the Holy Prophetsa in case he was attacked. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-maghazi, Hadith 4255)

When the Holy Prophetsa entered Mecca, some disbelievers retreated to the mountains, owing to their strong enmity toward the Holy Prophetsa and being unable to bear seeing the Holy Prophetsa and his Companions performing the Tawaf. Others gathered at Dar al-Nadwah to mockingly observe the Tawaf, saying, “What sort of Tawaf will these Muslims perform? Their hunger and the fever of Medina have weakened them greatly.”

Upon reaching the Sacred Mosque, the Holy Prophetsa did dhtiba’, meaning he drew his sheet upon himself in a manner that exposed his right shoulder and arm. Then the Holy Prophetsa said, “May God bestow His mercy upon those who exhibit their strength before these disbelievers.” Then, along with his Companions, the Holy Prophetsa began circling the Ka‘bah. They undertook the first three circuits while moving their shoulders and fully upright. They showed that whereas they thought them to be weak, they were not weak at all.

There is a narration about this in Bukhari. Hazrat Ibn Abbasra states that the Holy Prophetsa and his Companions arrived, and the disbelievers said, “Such people are coming to you who have been weakened by the fever of Medina.” The Holy Prophetsa instructed the Companions to perform three circuits while running, which is known in Arabic as “raml”. Every person who circles the Ka‘bah does “raml” for the first three circuits. The Holy Prophetsa showed kindness to the Companions and did not instruct them to run for all the circuits. Hazrat Ibn Abbasra states that the Holy Prophetsa performed circuits around the House of Allah and between Safa and Marwah whilst running in order to show his strength to the disbelievers.

According to another narration, the Holy Prophetsa performed “Sa’i” between Safa and Marwa whilst riding upon his animal. The Holy Prophetsa and the Muslims sacrificed [their sacrificial animals] near Marwah.

After this, the Holy Prophetsa sent some Companions to Yajaj, where there were some Companions who had been appointed to stay with the weaponry, so that they could assume the duty from them, allowing them to perform ‘Umrah, the sacrifice and other rites. (Sharh al-Zurqani, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 322; Sirat ibn Hisham, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 717; Lughat-ul-Hadith, Vol. 2, p. 163; Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-hajj, Hadith 1602; Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-hajj, Hadith 1649)

Those who had been on duty with the weaponry were summoned so that they could perform ‘Umrah, and some new people were sent there to assume the duty from them.

On this occasion, the Holy Prophet’ssa marriage to Hazrat Maimunahra took place. The details of this are that during the same journey, the Holy Prophetsa married Maimunah bint Harithra. This marriage was facilitated by Hazrat Abbasra. Hazrat Maimunahra gave the decision of her marriage to her sister, Hazrat Umm Fazl, who was the wife of the Holy Prophet’ssa uncle, Hazrat Abbasra. Hazrat Umm Fazlra then entrusted the decision to Hazrat Abbasra. Hazrat Abbasra settled her marriage with the Holy Prophetsa and Hazrat Maimunah’sra dowry was stipulated at four hundred dirhams. (Sirat ibn Hisham, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 718; Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 8, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 217)

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has made mention of this as follows:

“Hazrat Abbas’ra sister-in-law Maimunahra, who had been a widow for quite some time, resided in Mecca. Hazrat Abbasra expressed his desire for the Holy Prophetsa to marry her, and the Holy Prophetsa accepted.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 329-330)

The Holy Prophetsa remained in Mecca for three days. On the third day, the Quraish sent Huwaitab bin Abd al-Uzza along with some others from the Quraish to the Holy Prophetsa. According to one narration, this delegation of the Quraish went to Hazrat Alira, saying that the period of their stay was completed, and they should now leave. Upon this, the Holy Prophetsa said, “What harm is there if we remain a little while longer? We will prepare the food for our wedding here, as I am getting married. We will also invite you.” The Quraish said, “We have no need for your invitation.” Upon this, the Holy Prophetsa and his Companions departed from Mecca, and he left his servant Abu Rafi with Hazrat Maimunahra. He took Hazrat Maimunahra to meet the Holy Prophetsa at a place called Sarif, a large valley near Tan’im, about six to seven miles from Mecca.

Hazrat Maimunah’sra name was Barrah, and the Holy Prophetsa changed her name to Maimunah. The Holy Prophet’ssa marriage to Hazrat Maimunahra was his last marriage. Hazrat Maimunahra passed away in 51 AH at Sarif, the same place where her “rukhstana with the Holy Prophetsa took place. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-maghazi, Hadith 4251; Al-Isabah, Vol. 8, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, pp. 322 and 324; Sirat ibn Hisham, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 718; Furhang-e-Sirat, Zawar Academy, p. 147)

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra writes:

“On the fourth day, the Meccans demanded that, in accordance with the treaty, the Holy Prophetsa should leave. The Holy Prophetsa immediately instructed all the Companions to leave Mecca and set out towards Medina. Bearing the sentiments of the Meccans in mind, the Holy Prophetsa even left the newly married Maimunahra behind, to join him later along with the animals bearing their provisions. He made his own riding animal run swiftly, exiting the boundaries of the Sacred Mosque, and it was there, later in the evening, that his wife Maimunahra was brought. It was there in the jungle that Maimunahra went to the Holy Prophetsa and they spent their first night.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 330)

That blessed place of Companionship with the Holy Prophetsa remained very dear to Hazrat Maimunahra. This was the reason that Hazrat Maimunahra expressed in her will that when she passed away, she should be buried at the same place where the Holy Prophet’ssa tent was, the one in which she was brought to the Holy Prophetsa. It was God’s will that when she went to perform Hajj, she fell ill in Mecca. After a few days, she asked to be taken outside of Mecca because the Holy Prophetsa had told her that she would not pass away in Mecca. Hence, the people took her outside of Mecca and when they reached Sarif, the mother of the believers, Hazrat Maimunah’sra soul departed from her body, and she passed away. Thus, in accordance with her will, she was buried in that very place. At the time of her demise, she was 80 or 81 years of age. (Imta’ul Asma, Vol. 12, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 212; Fath al-Bari, Vol. 9, Aram Bagh Karachi, p. 141; Al-Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn, Vol. 4, p. 398, Hadith 6936)

During this journey, there is also mention of an incident pertaining to Hazrat Hamzah’sra daughter. Hazrat Bara’ahra states that when the Holy Prophetsa was about to depart from Mecca, Hazrat Hamzah’sra daughter came after him, calling out, “O my uncle, O my uncle.” Upon this, Hazrat Alira took her hand and told Hazrat Fatimahra to take her uncle’s daughter. She took her along on her riding animal. Hazrat Alira, Hazrat Zaidra, and Hazrat Ja’farra disputed regarding her [custody]. Hazrat Alira said, “I have taken her in, and she is my uncle’s daughter.” Hazrat Ja’farra said, “She is my uncle’s daughter, and her maternal aunt is my wife.” Hazrat Zaidra said, “She is my brother’s daughter.” The Holy Prophetsa decided the matter in favour of her maternal aunt, saying that the maternal aunt [khalah] is like a mother. This was another matter which he resolved. Many such matters are disputed in Qadha. The Holy Prophetsa said that the maternal aunt is like a mother and that the child should be given to her. The Holy Prophetsa said to Hazrat Alira, “You are from me and I am from you.” He comforted him in this way. He said to Hazrat Ja’farra, “You resemble me in your appearance and your morals.” To Hazrat Zaidra he said, “You are our brother and one of those among us who has been freed.” Hazrat Alira said, “Will you not marry Hazrat Hamzah’sra daughter?” The Holy Prophetsa said, “She is the daughter of my milk-brother. I cannot marry her.” The Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina in the month of Dhu al-Hijjah. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-maghazi, Hadith 4251)

Another expedition was of Akhram bin Abu Aujah towards the Banu Sulaim. This expedition took place in Dhu al-Hijjah 7 AH. The Holy Prophetsa sent Hazrat Akhramra along with fifty men towards the Banu Sulaim who resided near Medina. A spy from the Banu Sulaim was accompanying Hazrat Akhramra and he went ahead and alerted his people, who gathered a large army.

When Hazrat Akhramra reached them, the Banu Sulaim were ready to fight against them. Hazrat Akhramra invited them towards Islam. They replied: “We are in no need for that to which you invite us.” Following this, both sides fired arrows for some time. During this time, the Banu Sulaim received reinforcements and they surrounded the Muslims from all sides. The Muslims fought a fierce battle, until most of them were martyred. Hazrat Akhramra was also severely wounded and fell down amongst those who had died. He then reached the Holy Prophetsa on 1st Safar, 8 AH. (Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 2, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1990, p. 94; Furhang-e-Sirat, Zawar Academy, p. 155)

Then there is the expedition of Hazrat Ghalib bin Abdillah al-Laithi towards Kadid. The Holy Prophetsa sent Hazrat Ghalib bin Abdillah al-Laithira towards the Banu Mulawwih tribe, who were a branch of the Banu Laith tribe in Safar of 8 AH. The Banu Mulawwih lived in Kadid. Kadid was situated approximately 208 miles from Medina. (Ghazwat Wa Saraya, Fareediyah Publishers, Sahiwal, p. 413; Sharh al-Zurqani, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 332; Encyclopedia Sirat-un-Nabi, Zam Zam Publishers, p. 188)

In Sahih al-Bukhari, it is mentioned that Kadid was a spring situated between Usfan and Qadid. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab as-sawm, Hadith 1944)

According to one narration, the Holy Prophetsa dispatched Hazrat Ghalibra with a 15-man contingent. In this expedition, the slogan raised by the Muslims was “Amit, Amit” [i.e. “Destroy”].

Hazrat Jundub bin Makithra narrates: “The Holy Prophetsa dispatched Hazrat Ghalib bin Abdillahra on an expedition, and I was part of that expedition. He ordered us to attack the Banu Mulawwih in Kadid. Thus, we set off and reached Kadid. When we reached Kadid, we encountered Ibn Barsa Harith bin Malik al-Laithi, whom we apprehended and brought with us. He said: ‘I have set out to convert to Islam and am heading to see the Holy Prophetsa.’ We said, ‘If you have indeed set out to convert to Islam, then one day and one night’s provisions will not harm you. (Meaning if he remained imprisoned, it would not cause him any harm) But if you have any other intentions, then we shall soon find out.’ And so, we tied him up tightly and appointed Suwaid bin Manhar, a slave of dark complexion, to stand guard.

We continued our journey until we reached Kadid at sunset. We were on one side of the valley when my companions told me to go on ahead and gather information. I climbed atop a small mount from where I could observe them. Ascending it, I raised my head and lay flat on my stomach. Thereupon, a man emerged from his tent and caught sight of me. He shot an arrow which struck my side – and according to one narration, he said that the arrow landed between my eyes, upon my forehead – yet I remained steadfast in my position. Then he shot a second arrow, which struck my shoulder; I pulled it out and cast it aside, remaining firm in my place without making the slightest movement, lest he be alerted. Eventually, he returned to his tent.

We granted them a respite, and when they had grown content and fallen asleep, we launched an attack upon them at the break of dawn. We slew their warriors, took their weapons and drove away their livestock.

Then one of them cried out and gathered together such a formidable army whose strength far surpassed our own. A mighty army was brought against us. We continued on our way with the animals and did not once look back. As we passed by Ibn Barsa and his companion, we took them along with us as well.

The enemy drew so near that only the valley of Kadid remained between us and them. At that moment, Allah the Almighty caused a flood to surge through the valley, even though no clouds or rain could be seen. Thus, Allah sent a force against which none had the power to withstand, nor could anyone cross it. The enemy stood on the other side, looking in our direction, while we continued to take away their livestock. Not a single one among them was granted the ability to advance towards us. And so, we hastened on with the animals until we left them behind, i.e. the enemy remained behind and could not catch us. Eventually, we arrived in the blessed presence of the Holy Prophetsa.” (Sharh al-Zurqani, Vol. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, pp. 332-333; Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad, Vol. 6, Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah 1993, p. 137)

 In any case, these accounts are ongoing.

At this time, I wish to make a special appeal for prayers for the Ahmadis in Pakistan. The Ahmadis of Pakistan should pray for themselves as well. As I have said, they should focus on reciting durood [prayer for sending salutations upon the Holy Prophetsa] and they should recite the following 200 times a day:

سُبْحَانَ اللّٰہِ وَبِحَمْدِہٖ سُبْحَانَ اللّٰہِ الْعَظِیْمِ اَللّٰھُمَّ صَلِّ عَلٰی مُحَمَّدٍ وَّاٰلِ مُحَمَّدٍ

[Holy is Allah and worthy of all praise; Holy is Allah the Great. O Allah bestow Thy blessings upon Muhammadsa and the people of Muhammadsa.]

The greatest possible attention should be given towards this. If we do justice to offering prayers and give due regard, only then will there be progress. The attention that should have been given to prayers has not yet been given. It cannot be said, as some people write to me, that prayers alone will not achieve anything and that something else should be done. But what else should be done? Our only weapon is prayer, something which I have repeatedly mentioned and I have also presented quotations of the Promised Messiahas. It is very wrong to think that prayers will have no effect. Prayers are the solution to our success. May Allah the Almighty enable everyone to do so and enable us to be those who do justice to offering prayers. If we simply say that prayers will not result in anything and we do not do justice to them, then it will be an erroneous complaint against Allah the Almighty on our part. We should seek forgiveness for this.

There was also an incident in Karachi today where rioters and terrorists – though they claim to represent Islam, but in reality, they are terrorists – attacked one of our mosques, where an Ahmadi was also martyred.

 اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّا اِلَیْہِ رَاجِعُوْن

[Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.] 

The details have not yet been received. They will be presented once they are received, insha-Allah. May Allah the Almighty procure the means for these cruel people to swiftly be brought to task.

(Official Urdu transcript published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 9 May 2025, pp. 2-7. Translated by The Review of Religions.)