Home Blog Page 139

Nasir Saleem Bajwa and his devotion to Khilafat

0
Asima Bajwa, Virginia North, USA

Most of my father’s adult life, as I have personally observed, reflected his grand love for Khilafat; so much so that, we discovered over time, many of his everyday habits and routine were picked up from what he observed from the Khulafa of the Promised Messiahas.

Beginning his relationship with Khilafat

In 1932, Nasir Saleem Bajwa Sahib was born into a respectable agricultural family in Sargodha. He was the eighth son of his parents. The eldest was Zahoor Ahmad Bajwa Sahib, former Imam of the London Mosque. His mother passed away when he was very young. Bajwa Sahib spent his 20s and early 30s in Hong Kong, where he was stationed as a police officer.

He would repeatedly dream of falling into a stream of water where he would drown. In the dream, a saintly-looking, bearded man would appear and extend a hand in order to save him. Initially, Bajwa Sahib didn’t understand the dream’s significance, so he ignored it. However, the dream’s meaning became clear when my father visited Pakistan and came to Rabwah to meet his brother, Zahoor Ahmad Bajwa Sahib, who, at that time, was the assistant private secretary to Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra. They went to meet Huzoorra in Malam Jabba. My father was astonished to discover that the man he had seen in his dream was, in fact, the Khalifatul Masih; since my father had never met Huzoorra before and had never seen his photograph, he did not recognise him until then. That was perhaps the beginning of his own relationship with Khilafat-e-Ahmadiyyat.

‘Junior’

Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IIIrh announced Bajwa Sahib’s nikah during the 1967 Jalsa Salana. Huzoorrh also graced the walima function with his presence and gave 50 rupees as salami (a standard cash gift for the groom) – his most cherished memory throughout his life, to have such affection from the Khalifa of the time.

Bajwa Sahib had the great honour of being a security member of Huzoor’srh qafilah (entourage) for the historical foreign trips of 1970 and 1978. The 1970 tour lasted four months, and the 1978 one was almost five months. One day before the departure of the qafilah from Rabwah, Huzoorrh called my father and said that he would call him Junior from now. My father, throughout his life, was over the moon with this title, and this was more important to him than any worldly title.

Glimpses of Abu’s love for Khilafat

Bajwa Sahib was not avid in reading books, but he would usually keep a book or two from the Jamaat handy. Invitation to Ahmadiyyat was his favourite book, not only for himself but also for anyone who was under his tabligh. Scores of people must have received this book as a gift from him.

When Friday sermons started to be telecast live on MTA, he was quick to install the satellite TV at our house in Lahore despite facing financial difficulties, as satellite receivers were very expensive in Pakistan at that time. Watching every Friday sermon, with some guests, and other programmes of Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IVrh on MTA was part of the normal routine of our house in that decade. He really enjoyed watching the Q&A sessions of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh.

Recovery due to Huzoor’srh prayers

In 2002, Bajwa Sahib, while attending the Jalsa Salana in London, suffered severe heart problems. He was admitted to the St. George’s Hospital. A fortuitous cancellation allowed Nasir Sahib to undergo an immediate operation, a rare occurrence due to the typically long wait times in UK hospitals. Following the surgery, the medical team delivered a deeply disheartening prognosis. Confronted with this dire situation, Bajwa Sahib’s son sought the prayers of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh.

Huzoor’srh response was one of faith; he asserted that life and death are in God’s hands, not in the hands of the doctors and promised to pray for Bajwa Sahib’s recovery. Remarkably, within a week, Bajwa Sahib began to exhibit signs of improvement, an event that seemed to manifest as a miraculous second lease on life granted by Allah the Almighty.

This extraordinary recovery was a testament to how Allah listens to the prayers of the Khulafa. (Majlis Ansarullah USA, “Stories of My Elders”, www.youtube.com)

Life’s desire fulfilled

Bajwa Sahib moved to Dallas, USA, in the last decade of his life. When he was free from his children’s responsibilities and financial burdens and was in relatively good health, he would announce his wish to offer his security services to Huzooraa, once again. We thought it was not practical for an 80-year-old man to undertake such a strenuous job, but as the saying goes, love needs no reason.

When he heard that Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, was coming to Houston in 2018, he was determined to go and see him. Due to his age, he was not very mobile and had to use a wheelchair for any movement outside the house, but nothing could stop his passion to meet Huzooraa. We tried to convince him that it would be hard for him to go to Houston for four days, but he was adamant. Through his willpower and passion, he overcame the challenges and made his way to Houston.

Once there, his life’s desire was to offer prayers behind Huzooraa, and Allah fulfilled it the very first day. He then desired to be able to see Huzooraa up close, and again Allah fulfilled that too the next day. His final desire was to meet Huzooraa; surely enough, Allah fulfilled that desire. His wheelchair was parked along the route Huzooraa was to take. And then that lovely moment came that he had earnestly prayed for: Beloved Huzooraa stopped by him and said, “Assalamu alaikum. How are you, Bajwa Sahib?”. Father’s reply was as sweet as it could be, “Assalamu alaikum, Huzoor. Please pray that Allah may remove the weakness of my legs, I wish to serve you.”

Devotion to Khilafat leads to success

His eating habits, especially in his final years, were focused on relishing fish and honey. Whenever we would go out to eat, Abu would insist on getting fish, even if that restaurant was not particularly known for its seafood. He loved to consume a small quantity of honey of different kinds on a daily basis. He would ask one of his daughters-in-law to bring him honey from Russia. We found out that both of these were favourites of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh. Huzoorrh also used to like honey from various countries.

The only advice he would have for any Ahmadi would be to strengthen the bond with Khilafat. If Abu had written any will for his children, it would have been to have devotion to Khilafat in order to be successful in life. Abu’s own life was a testimony to this. It was his firm belief that all he had ever been blessed with was because of the devotion that he and his elders had for Khilafat.

Abu was very content with every aspect of his life, and we never saw him unhappy, worried, or ambitious for material things. He was always thankful to Allah for His countless blessings on him and his family and was truly content.

On 11 May 2019, the night between Friday and Saturday, Nasir Saleem Bajwa Sahib – whom we called Abu (father) –  peacefully, in his sleep, crossed the shore of life and met his Creator.

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّاۤ اِلَيۡہِ رٰجِعُوۡنَ

Ignorant clerics

0

عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ يَقُولُ سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللّٰه صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّم يَقُولُ: إِنَّ اللّٰه لاَ يَقْبِضُ الْعِلْمَ انْتِزَاعًا يَنْتَزِعُهُ مِنَ النَّاسِ وَلَكِنْ يَقْبِضُ الْعِلْمَ بِقَبْضِ الْعُلَمَاءِ حَتَّى إِذَا لَمْ يَتْرُكْ عَالِمًا اتَّخَذَ النَّاسُ رُءُوسًا جُهَّالاً فَسُئِلُوا فَأَفْتَوْا بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ فَضَلُّوا وَأَضَلُّوا‏.‏

Hazrat ‘Abdullah bin ‘Amr bin al-‘As reported Allah’s Messengersa as saying:

“Verily, Allah does not take away knowledge by snatching it from the people but He takes away knowledge by taking away the scholars so that when He leaves no learned person, people turn to the ignorant as their leaders; then they are asked to deliver religious verdicts and they deliver them without knowledge, they go astray, and lead others astray.”

(Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-‘ilm, Bab raf‘i l-‘ilmi wa qabdhihi wa zuhuri l-jahli wa l-fitani fi akhiri z-zaman, Hadith 2673a)

Friday Sermon – Muhammad (sa): The Great Exemplar (10 November 2023)

0

Friday Sermon

10 November 2023

Muhammadsa: The Great Exemplar

Mubarak Mosque

After reciting the tashahudta‘awuz and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

I have been narrating accounts from the life of the Holy Prophetsa and mentioning incidents that took place immediately after the Battle of Badr. In this respect, one of the significant incidents that took place, in the second year after Hijra, was the establishment of the graveyard in Medina, Jannat-ul-Baqi‘. The details of the establishment of Jannat-ul-Baqi‘ are as follows:

When the Holy Prophetsa settled in Medina, there were many graveyards. The Jews and the various Arab tribes had their own respective graveyards. Since Medina was divided into various areas at the time, every tribe would bury their deceased in the open fields of their respective areas. Quba had its own graveyard, which was the most well-known, although there were several other smaller graveyards there as well. The tribe of Banu Zafar had its own graveyard and the tribe of Banu Salama had its own graveyard. Other graveyards included the graveyard of Banu Sa’idah, where later the Souq al-Nabisa was established. On the land where Masjid an-Nabawi was built, there were also some graves of polytheists among the date orchards. Among all of these graveyards, Baqi‘ al-Gharqad was the oldest and most well-known. After the Holy Prophetsa selected it as the graveyard for the Muslims, it acquired a unique and distinct status, which shall always remain.

Hazrat ‘Ubaidullah bin Abi Rafi’ra relates that the Holy Prophetsa was in search of a place where only Muslims would be buried and for this purpose, he inspected various places. This honour was however destined for Baqi‘ al-Gharqad. The Holy Prophetsa said, “I have been commanded to select this place (i.e. Baqi‘ al-Gharqad).” During that time, it was also known as Baqi‘ al-Khabkhabah. There were countless Gharqad trees and shrubs. It was filled with mosquitoes and other insects and whenever mosquitoes would populate in this area due to the filth, or it being a jungle, it would seem like a cloud of smoke had covered the area. The first person to be buried there was Hazrat ‘Uthman bin Maz’unra. The Holy Prophetsa placed a stone by his side as an indication and said, “He is our predecessor.” Whenever someone passed away after him, people would ask the Holy Prophetsa where to bury them. Upon this, the Holy Prophetsa would say, “Bury him in Baqi‘, near our predecessor, ‘Uthman bin Maz’un.” In Arabic, Baqi‘ is referred to as a place filled with many trees. In any case, in Medina, this place started to be known as Baqi’ al-Gharqad, since it was filled with Gharqad trees, as I mentioned earlier. Aside from this, there were many desert shrubs as well. It is also called Jannat-ul-Baqi‘. The meaning of Jannat in Arabic is garden, or paradise. As such, it is known as Jannat-ul-Baqi‘ among most non-Arab visitors.

‘Abd-ul-Hamid Qadri Sahib has recorded these various details. Following this, he says that we should not forget that Arabs generally call their graveyards Jannat. Another name for this [graveyard] is Maqabir al-Baqi’, which was more commonly known among the Bedouins. (Abdul Hameed Qadiri, Justuju-e-Madinah [Lahore, Pakistan: Oriental Publications Lahore, 2007], p. 598)

With regards to this, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra has mentioned in Sirat Khatamun-Nabiyyin [The Life and Character of the Seal of Prophetssa] as follows:

“To the end of this year (i.e., 2 AH), the Holy Prophetsa proposed the creation of a graveyard in Medina for his Companions which was referred to as Jannat al-Baqi‘. After its creation, the Companions were generally buried in this very graveyard. The first Companion to be buried in this graveyard was Uthmanra bin Maz‘un. Uthmanra was from among the most pioneer Muslims, and was extremely righteous and pious. He was a man of ascetic disposition. On one occasion, after becoming a Muslim, he submitted to the Holy Prophetsa, ‘If the Holy Prophetsa kindly grants permission, it is my desire to abandon the world completely and separate myself from my wife and children, so that I may devote my life wholly to the worship of Allah.’ However, the Holy Prophetsa did not permit him to do so. As a matter of fact, even with respect to such people who would not abandon the world completely, but would fast and offer Salat so often that it would affect the rights of their dependents, the Holy Prophetsa would say:

“‘You should offer the right owed to God, you should offer the rights owed to your wives and children, you should offer the rights owed to guests, and you should offer the right owed to your own soul. For all of these rights have been appointed by God, and the fulfilment of them is also a form of worship.’

“Therefore, the Holy Prophetsa did not permit ‘Uthman bin Maz‘unra to abandon the world, and whilst prohibiting celibacy and asceticism in Islam, the Holy Prophetsa established a middle course for his community, which is set between the two extremes. The Holy Prophetsa was deeply saddened by the demise of Uthman bin Maz‘unra. There is a narration that after his demise, the Holy Prophetsa kissed his forehead and at the time there were tears in the eyes of the Holy Prophetsa. After his burial, the Holy Prophetsa fixed a stone at the head of his grave to serve as a marking, and then, every so often, he would visit the Jannat al-Baqi‘ and pray for him. Uthmanra was the first Muhajir to pass away in Medina.” (Sirat Khatamun-Nabiyyin, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra, pp. 462-463)

I shall now mention the expedition of Dhi Amr, also known as the Expedition of Banu Ghatafan. The Holy Prophetsa received news that the Banu Tha’labah and Banu Maharib branches of the Ghatafan tribe had gathered at a place called Dhi Amr. This is a village in the vicinity of Ghatafan. Their objective was to attack the neighbouring areas of the city of Medina and to get them to join them. The individual who was inciting them against the Muslims was Dau’thur bin Harith of Banu Maharib. As soon as he received this news, the Holy Prophetsa instructed the people to prepare, and thus, he departed Medina with an army of 450 companions and some horses as well. The Holy Prophetsa assigned Hazrat Uthman bin Affanra as his deputy in Medina. (‘Ali bin Burhan al-Din al-Halabi,  Al-Sirah al-Halabiyyah, Vol. 2 [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah], p. 290; Mustafa ‘Abd al-Wahid, Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad fi Sirat Khair al-‘Ibad, Vol. 4 [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1993], p. 176)

The Expedition of Ghatafan took place in Rabi’ al-Awwal 3AH, and the Holy Prophetsa set forth for this expedition on 12 Rabi’ al-Awwal. The people of Medina had to bear his absence for 11 days, then on 24 Rabi’ al-Awwal, the Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina. The area where the Holy Prophetsa set up camp in order to gather intelligence about Ghatafan was a place near Ghatafan called Dhi Amr, and for this reason, the expedition is called the Expedition of Dhi Amr, and it is also referred to as the Expedition of Banu Ghatafan with reference to it being against the tribe of Ghatafan. (‘Ali bin Burhan al-Din al-Halabi,  Al-Sirah al-Halabiyyah, Vol. 2 [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah], p. 290; Da’irah Ma’arif Sirat Muhammadsa, Vol. 6 [Lahore, Pakistan: Dar al-Ma’arif], pp. 367-368)

It is recorded in relation to the Holy Prophet’ssa setting off to combat the assembling of the idolaters that after departing from Medina, the companions met a person of Banu Tha’labah at Dhu al-Qassah. Dhu al-Qassah was situated 14 miles from Medina towards Rabazah. This person was called Jabbar. The companions captured him and enquired as to where he was heading, to which he replied, “I wish to go to Yathrib in search of some livelihood,” and so he was taken to the Holy Prophetsa. He informed the Holy Prophetsa about the situation of his people, and after the Holy Prophetsa invited him to Islam, he at once became a Muslim. When he became aware of the intentions of the Holy Prophetsa to fight against the Banu Tha’labah and Banu Maharib, he said to the Holy Prophetsa, “O Muhammadsa! They will never face you in combat. If they find out about your arrival, they will flee immediately to the mountaintops.” They of course wanted to attack the outskirts of Medina, but they would never come face-to-face with the Muslims. Jabbar then said, “I will also accompany you.” The Holy Prophetsa placed Jabbar under the supervision of Bilalra.

This person took the Muslims via another route and reached their area. When the people there saw the Muslim army approaching, they all fled to the mountains. The Holy Prophetsa advanced and reached a spring called Dhi Amr, and set up camp there. All of a sudden, heavy rain began to fall there, causing the clothes of the Holy Prophetsa and his companions to be drenched. The Holy Prophetsa placed his wet clothes to dry on a tree and lay beneath that tree. The companions were occupied in their own work. This is where an evil attempt to kill the Holy Prophetsa was made. There are details in relation to this where a person drew his sword against the Holy Prophetsa. It is said that those who hid in the mountaintops were seeing all the movements of the Holy Prophetsa up above from the mountains. When the idolaters saw the Holy Prophetsa lying down in one place all alone, they went to their chief Dau’thur, who was the most courageous of them all. The idolaters said to him, “Right now, the Holy Prophetsa is lying down all alone. It is now your duty to deal with him.”

In one narration, it is recorded that when Dau’thur saw the Holy Prophetsa lying down alone, he said, “May Allah destroy me if I do not kill Muhammad[sa] now.” In any case, he went forth with his sword drawn towards the Holy Prophetsa but stopped as he reached right where his head lay. He then addressed the Holy Prophetsa, saying, “Who will save you from my hand today (or he said now)?” The Holy Prophetsa replied in full confidence, “Allah will protect me.” Upon this, the person fell to the ground, and his sword fell from his hand. The Holy Prophetsa immediately picked up his sword and asked him, “Who will now save you from me?” In reply, Dau’thur said:

لَا أَحَدٌ، وَأَنَا أَشْهَدُ أَنْ لَّا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا اللّٰهُ وَأَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُولُ اللّٰهِ، وَاللّٰهِ لَا أُ كَثِّرُ عَلَيْكَ جَمْعًا أَبَدًا

“No one will. I bear witness that there is no god except Allah, and Muhammadsa is His Messenger. By Allah, I shall never incite people against you again.”

This was the promise he made. The Holy Prophetsa granted him his sword back. According to another narration, Da’thur turned towards the Holy Prophetsa and said,  “By Allah, You are far greater than me in bestowing a favour.” The Holy Prophetsa replied:

أَنَا أَحَقُّ بِذٰلِكَ مِنْكَ

“I have a greater right to bestow a favour upon you.”  Dau’thur returned to his people, but he had changed so much that he began to preach to his people.

Dau’thur has related the incident of what happened to him and how he fell. Relating this incident of his falling down, he said, “I saw a tall person there. When I was standing there with my sword drawn, I saw a very tall person come there. He pushed my chest, and I fell on my back. (He hit him with his hand, and he fell on his back.) It was then that I realised that this was no human, but an angel. It is then that I accepted that there is no god but Allah, and Muhammadsa is the Messenger of Allah.” He said, “By Allah, I will never act against him again.”

Thereafter, he began to call his people to Islam. Through him, Allah the Almighty guided many people. In any case, the Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina after this, and no battle took place. The Holy Prophetsa spent 11 days in total away from Medina, and according to one saying, he remained outside of Medina for 15 days. Abu Umar states that the Holy Prophetsa spent the entire month of Safar in Najd. In any case, there are various narrations, but in actuality, the journey was only for a few days.

Some scholars have deemed that the aforementioned incident, about the attempt on the Holy Prophet’ssa life by the sword, took place during the Battle of Dhat al-Riqa‘. In doing so, they have declared the two incidents to be one and the same, however, most researchers consider these two incidents to have occurred during different battles. The name of the individual who attacked during the Battle of Dhat al-Riqa‘ has been reported to be Ghaurath. It is said that he accepted Islam, while there are also some opinions that he did not accept Islam, albeit he did make a vow with the Holy Prophetsa to never fight against him. This is a narration from Sahih al-Bukhari. (‘Ali bin Burhan al-Din al-Halabi,  Al-Sirah al-Halabiyyah, Vol. 2 [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah], p. 290; Mustafa ‘Abd al-Wahid, Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad fi Sirat Khair al-‘Ibad, Vol. 4 [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1993], p. 176; Sirat Encyclopaedia, Vol. 6, p. 71, Maktabah Dar al-Ma’arif; Sharh al-Zurqani ‘ala al-Mawahib al-Laduniyyah, Vol. 2, [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1996], pp. 381-382; Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-Maghazi, Bab ghazwat al-Riqa’, Hadith 4136)

Another incident that took place during this time period was the demise of Hazrat Ruqayyahra and the marriage of Hazrat Umm Kulthumra. The details of these incidents have been narrated by Abdullah bin Muknif bin Harithah Ansari. He narrates, “When the Holy Prophetsa departed for the Battle of Badr, he left his daughter, Hazrat Ruqayyahra, in the care of Hazrat Uthmanra. She was ill and passed away on the same day that Hazrat Zaid bin Harithahra arrived in Medina with glad tidings of the victory Allah the Almighty granted to the Holy Prophetsa at Badr. The Holy Prophetsa designated a share from the spoils of Badr for Hazrat Uthmanra, and his share was equal to the share of those who partook in the battle. After the demise of Hazrat Ruqayyahra, the Holy Prophetsa married his [other] daughter, Hazrat Umm Kulthumra, to Hazrat Uthmanra.” (Ibn Sa’d, Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 3, Dhikr Islam ‘Uthman bin ‘Affanra [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1990], p. 41)

Hazrat Abu Hurairahra narrates, “The Holy Prophetsa met Hazrat Uthmanra by the mosque door and said, ‘O Uthman, this is Gabriel. He has informed me that Allah the Almighty has decreed your marriage with Umm Kulthum with the same value of dowry as Ruqayyahra and upon your kind treatment towards her.” (Sunan Ibn Majah, Iftitah al-Kitab, Fadl ‘Uthmanra, Hadith 110)

In other words, Allah the Almighty instructed that the Holy Prophetsa should also marry his other daughter to Hazrat Uthmanra with the same value of dowry given to Ruqayyah.

Hazrat A’ishahra narrates, “When the Holy Prophetsa married Umm Kulthumra to Hazrat Uthmanra, he said to Hazrat Umm Aimanra, ‘Prepare my daughter Umm Kulthum and then take her to Uthman’s home and beat the drum before her.’ She did as she was instructed. The Holy Prophetsa visited Hazrat Umm Kulthumra three days later and said to her, ‘My beloved daughter, how do you find your husband?’ Umm Kulthumra replied, ‘He is an excellent husband.’” (Muhammad al-Sallabi, Sirat Amir al-Mu’minin ‘Uthman bin ‘Affanra Shakhsiyyatuhu wa ‘Asruhu, p. 41, Ch. 1, Dhu al-Nurain ‘Uthman bin ‘Affanra…, Dar al-Ma’rifah, Beirut, 2006)

Hazrat Umm Kulthumra remained with Hazrat Uthmanra until 9 AH, after which she fell ill and passed away. The Holy Prophetsa led her funeral prayer and sat by her grave for a while.” Hazrat Anasra narrates, “I saw the Holy Prophetsa with tears in his eyes as he sat by Hazrat Umm Kulthum’sra grave.” (Muhammad al-Sallabi, Sirat Amir al-Mu’minin ‘Uthman bin ‘Affanra Shakhsiyyatuhu wa ‘Asruhu, p. 42, Al-Mabhath al-Thalith: Malazimatuhu li al-Nabisa fi al-Madinah…, Dar al-Ma’rifah, Beirut, 2006)

In a narration of Sahih al-Bukhari, this incident is recorded in the following manner. Hilal narrates that Hazrat Anas bin Malikra said, “We were attending the funeral prayers of the Holy Prophet’ssa daughter. I saw that the Holy Prophetsa was sitting by his daughter’s grave with tears flowing from his eyes.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-Jana’iz, Bab man Yadkhulu Qabr al-Mar’ah, Hadith 1342)

In another narration, it is recorded that upon the demise of Hazrat Umm Kulthumra, the Holy Prophetsa said, “If I had a third daughter, I would also marry her to Uthman.” (Ibn Sa’d, Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, Vol. 3, ‘Uthman bin ‘Affanra [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1990], p. 41)

Hazrat Ibn Abbasra narrates, “The Holy Prophetsa passed by a place and saw Hazrat Uthmanra sitting there, crying in sorrow over the demise of the Holy Prophet’ssa daughter, Hazrat Umm Kulthumra.” The narrator further says, “The Holy Prophetsa was accompanied by his two Companions, Hazrat Abu Bakrra and Hazrat Umarra. The Holy Prophetsa inquired, ‘O Uthman, why do you cry?’ Hazrat Uthmanra replied, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, I am crying on account of my relation to you as your son-in-law has now come to an end. Both of your daughters were married to me, and both have passed away. Now, I am no longer your son-in-law.’ The Holy Prophetsa said, ‘Do not cry. I swear by Him to Whom my life belongs, if I had a hundred daughters and each passed away one at a time, I would marry each and every one of them to you, one after the other, until not a single one of them remained.’” (Kanz al-‘Ummal, Vol. 13, p. 397, Kitab al-Fada’il al-Sahabah, Fada’il al-Sahabah, Fada’il Dhu al-Nurain ‘Uthman bin ‘Affanra, Hadith 36201, Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2004)

This was a mutual expression of love from both sides. On the one hand, Hazrat Uthmanra was saddened that his relation as a son-in-law had finished, and on the other, the Holy Prophetsa compassionately consoled him. He reassured him that he should not grieve, for he was still closely related to him.

Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra mentions this marriage in his book Life and Character of the Seal of Prophets in the following words:

“After the demise of Ruqayyahra, the daughter of the Holy Prophetsa and wife of Hazrat Uthman bin ‘Affanra, the Holy Prophetsa gave another daughter named Umm Kulthumra, who was older than Hazrat Fatimahra but younger than Ruqayyahra, to Hazrat Uthmanra in marriage. It is for this very reason that Hazrat Uthmanra is known as Dhu al-Nurain, i.e., the possessor of two lights. This was the second marriage of Umm Kulthumra, because in the beginning, her sister Ruqayyahra and her were married to the two sons of Abu Lahab, the paternal uncle of the Holy Prophetsa. However, before their Rukhsatanah could be held, this relation was severed on the basis of religious opposition. The Holy Prophetsa gave his daughter Ruqayyahra to Hazrat Uthmanra in marriage first, and then after her demise, married off Umm Kulthumra to him as well. It is unfortunate, however, that the progeny of both these daughters did not continue. Umm Kulthumra did not have any children at all, and the son of Ruqayyahra, whose name was ‘Abdullah, passed away at the age of six. The marriage of Umm Kulthumra took place in Rabi‘ al-Awwal 3 A.H.” (Sirat Khatamun-Nabiyyin, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra, pp. 463-464)

Another event that is reported to have taken place during this period is the Battle of Buhran. Aside from being called the Battle of Buhran, it has also been referred to as the Battle of Furu and the Battle of Banu Sulaim. Buhran is a mineral mine in the Valley of Furu that belonged to the people of Hijaz. The Valley of Furu is located 96 miles from Medina. The Holy Prophetsa received news that a large number from the Banu Sulaim had gathered in Buhran. Thus, the Holy Prophetsa appointed Hazrat Abdullah bin Umm Maktumra, or according to another narration, Hazrat Umarra as his deputy in Medina and departed towards Buhran with 300 companions. The Holy Prophetsa did not initially express the reason for this expedition, however, when the Muslim army was just a night’s journey away from Buhran, a man from the Banu Sulaim met the Holy Prophetsa and informed him that the people had dispersed. The Holy Prophetsa handed over that man into the custody of a Companion and continued the journey until they reached Buhran. The Holy Prophetsa did not find anyone there because they had left in search for water. Thus, the Holy Prophetsa returned, and a battle did not occur. The Holy Prophetsa departed for this expedition from Medina on 6 Jumadi al-Ula, and after 10 night’s journey, he returned on 16 Jumadi al-Ula. Contrary to this, Ibn Ishaq says that the Holy Prophetsa set out to intercept the trade caravan of the Quraish when he arrived at Buhran, a mine of Hijaz in the Valley of Furu. The Holy Prophetsa spent the two months of Rabi’ al-Akhir and Jumadi al-Ula there, and then returned to Medina. In all this time no fighting took place. (Sharh al-Zurqani ‘ala al-Mawahib al-Laduniyyah, Vol. 2, [Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1996], 382-383; Ibn Hisham, Sirat Ibn Hisham[Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2001], 513; Sayyid Fadl al-Rahman, Farhang-e-Sirat [Karachi, Pakistan: Zawwar Academy Publications, 2003], p. 226)

Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra mentions the details of the Battle of Buhran in the following words:

“Much time had not passed since the Ghazwah of Dhi ‘Amr, that is to say, in late Rabi‘ al-Awwal 3 A.H., the Holy Prophetsa received the horrific news that the Banu Sulaim were once again regrouping in a very large number at Buhran, with the intention of launching a sudden attack upon Medina, and that a party of the Quraish was also accompanying them. With no other choice, the Holy Prophetsa set out from Medina once again with a group of Companions. However, as was their habit, these wild beasts of Arabia, who lay in ambush to strike their prey suddenly and in a state of inattention, dispersed upon receiving news of the imminent arrival of the Holy Prophetsa. After a stay of a few days, the Holy Prophetsa returned.

“The fact that the Banu Sulaim and Banu Ghatafan would gather again and again with the intention of launching a sudden attack upon Medina clearly demonstrated that these barbaric and warlike tribes of the Arabian Desert were very deadly enemies of Islam. Day and night, they would remain preoccupied in order to find some opportunity by which the Muslims would be utterly destroyed. Just attempt to visualize the vulnerable state of the Muslims at the time, as to how their days were passing in that era. On the one hand, there were the Quraish of Mecca who had become blinded due to their enmity of Islam and due to their spirit of revenge for the Battle of Badr. Clinging to the drapes of the Ka‘bah, they took vows that they would not rest until the Muslims had been annihilated. On the other hand were these blood-thirsty wild beasts of the Arabian Desert, who were restless to drink the blood of the Muslims due to their being incited by the Quraish and their own animosity towards Islam. As such, take note of how many times within the course of a few months after Badr, the Holy Prophetsa was compelled to travel personally in order to safeguard himself from the deadly motives of the barbaric tribes of Arabia. As Sir William Muir has described, these were days of scorching heat as well, and not to mention, this heat was of the Arabian desert. If it were not for the special succour of God, and if the vigilance of the Holy Prophetsa had not kept the Muslims constantly watchful and alert, and if the Holy Prophetsa had not employed strategies to scatter the force of the enemy prior to their launching a sudden attack at night, the Muslims would have surely been destroyed and ruined in those days; and these were only external threats. As far as internal threats were concerned, they were no less either. Even in Medina itself, there existed a group known as the hypocrites, who lived among the Muslims as their own, and it would definitely be no exaggeration to refer to them as a snake in the grass. In addition to them were the treacherous and habitual conspirators in the form of the Jewish people, whose enmity had reached the furthest limits in its depth and breadth. Goodness Gracious! What a time of adversity this was for the Muslims!! Let us hear it in their own words. Ubayy bin Ka‘b, a renowned Companion relates:

“‘In that era, the state of the Companions was such that they would not even put off their arms at night and during the day they would walk around armed in case of a sudden attack. They would say to each other let us see if we live till such a time when we might be able to sleep in peace and security at night without any fear except the fear of God.’

“What difficulty and helplessness, and what a longing for a life of peace and security is hidden in these words. Every just individual can measure this for himself.” (Sirat Khatamun-Nabiyyin, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra, pp. 464-465)

These circumstances are present in some places even today, especially in Palestine at present. 

There was also the expedition of Zaid bin Harithah, the details of which are as follows. The defeat of the Banu Sulaim, the exile of the Banu Ghatafan, the fleeing of Abu Sufyan during the Battle of Sawiq, and the defeat of the Banu Tha’labah and Banu Maharib during the Battle of Banu Ghatafan were all testaments to the growing military competence of Medina. Above all, the victory of the believers and the humiliating defeat of the idolaters in the Battle of Badr caused the enemies of Islam great economic challenges because the main [trading] route from Mecca to Syria passed through the west of Medina along the Red Sea. The Muslims tried to intercept Abu Sufyan’s trade caravan along this very route. The tribes in Medina’s nearby vicinity had also formed alliances with the Holy Prophetsa. For these reasons, the idolaters of Mecca were not prepared to use this route for trade. This obstacle that the Muslims had placed before the Meccans’ economic growth was a cause of great concern for them. They abandoned the main route to Syria and searched for an alternative route. One day, Safwan bin Umayyah addressed the disbelievers and said, “Muhammad[sa] and his Companions have made it difficult for us to live. They have prevented us from going to our central location for trade. I do not understand what we should do. [The Muslims] have not even indicated any intention of clearing from the coastal area. Most of the tribes living by the coast have also formed treaties with them and formed pacts with them. How will we travel, and what will we do? If we remain here in Mecca, we will consume our resources and all that we possess. After this, we will have nothing to live on. These were the goods we would take in the summer to Syria, and in the winter to Abyssinia for trade. What will happen now?” Everyone became worried upon hearing Safwan bin Umayyah’s words. Aswad bin Muttalib suggested that instead of taking the route by the coastline, they could go to Syria by travelling through Iraq. Safwan replied that he had no knowledge of such a route. Abu Zam’ah then said, “I will tell you about a guide who is well-acquainted with this route. The guide is Furat bin Hayan Ijli. He frequently uses this route and is well-acquainted with the journey.” Safwan swore by Allah and said, “Outstanding! This is exactly what I desired.” Furat was summoned. When he arrived, Safwan said, “I would like to take a trade caravan to Syria. Muhammad [sa] has caused us great worry because our trade caravans pass by them very closely. I wish to go to Syria through Iraq.” Furat replied, “I will guide you on a route through Iraq which the Companions of Muhammad[sa] will never discover. This is a desolate and deserted route.” Safwan said, “This is what I prefer. The fact that it is desolate is not of great concern because it is winter and we will not require as much water on our journey. We can endure this much.” Nonetheless, they commenced their preparations for the journey. Following this, Safwan bin Umayyah informed everyone about the preparations of the caravan and took his belongings. He also took utensils made of silver, silver nuggets and other goods along with him. Abu Zam’ah also entrusted Safwan with 300 Mithqals of gold and also some silver nuggets so that he could make purchases for him. One Mithqal of gold is approximately four and a half grams, or exactly 4.37 grams. Nevertheless, this was a large sum. According to another narration, Safwan set out with goods comprising silver utensils and silver nuggets equivalent to 30,000 dirhams. Abu Sufyan bin Harb also took a large amount of silver with him, and others from among the Quraish also gave their wealth to the members of the caravan for their purchases. Apart from Safwan and Abu Sufyan, many others such as Abdullah bin Abi Rabi’ah and Huwaitib bin Abd al-Uzzah joined the trade caravan. Thus, under the direction of Furat bin Hayan, the caravan of the Quraish departed for trade towards Syria on a route through Iraq.

There are some details with regards to the date of this expedition and the names it is known by. It is mentioned that this expedition took place in Jamada al-Ukhra 3 AH This expedition is also known as “Sariyyah Qardah”. Qardah was a water [well] found in the Najd area. The Quraish were very careful with regard to the route they took, as mentioned earlier. They tried their utmost for this news not to spread to Medina, otherwise it would have been impossible to use this route as well, however, the Will of Allah had decreed for something else and this news could not be kept a secret by the people of Mecca. Nu’aim bin Mas’ud Ashjai learnt of this plan. It was around the same time that he had to come to Medina to see to a particular task. At the time he was irreligious and a polytheist. In Medina, he stayed with one of the chieftains of the Banu Nadir, Kinanah bin Abi Huqaiq. He gave him alcohol to drink. A companion by the name Salit bin Nu’man bin Aslam frequently visited the Banu Nadir tribe. Salit reached the gathering in which Nu’aim and Kinanah bin Abi Huqaiq were seated. Nu’aim was completely drunk and owing to his intoxication, he was unable to stop himself from disclosing the plan. He told them everything about the plan of the trade route which would pass through Iraq under the supervision of Safwan bin Umayyah. Upon hearing this, Salit bin Nu’man left and informed the Holy Prophetsa about the plan. As soon as the Holy Prophetsa learnt of this, he immediately made preparations. He dispatched a contingent of 100 cavaliers under the command of Hazrat Zaid bin Harithahra. This was the first time Hazrat Zaid bin Harithahra was appointed as the commander-in-chief of the Muslim army. He succeeded in his expedition.

In one narration, it is mentioned that the Holy Prophetsa sent Hazrat Zaid bin Harithahra with 100 cavaliers. They went and intercepted the trade caravan. The leaders of the convoy ran and took shelter in the jungle. The companions took one or two men as prisoners and brought the spoils back to the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa split it into five parts, and one Khumus [one-fifth of the spoils of war reserved for Allah and His Messengersa] was equivalent to 20,000 dirhams. The Holy Prophetsa distributed the remaining wealth amongst the people who took part in the expedition. (Da’irah Ma’arif Sirat Muhammadsa, Vol. 6 [Lahore, Pakistan: Dar al-Ma’arif], pp. 395-398; Al-Waqidi, Kitab al-Tarikh wa al-Maghazi, Vol. 1 [Beirut, Lebanon: ‘Alam al-Kutub, 1984], 198; Sayyid Fadl al-Rahman, Farhang-e-Sirat [Karachi, Pakistan: Zawwar Academy Publications, 2003], p. 233)

In another narration, it is mentioned that Hazrat Zaidra covered the distance swiftly and the caravan of the Quraish were completely heedless of them. They were about to stop at a spring named Qardah when the Muslim army reached them. They launched an attack all of a sudden and overpowered them. Safwan bin Umayyah and the other people with him had no option but to flee. The Muslims captured Furat bin Hayan, the guide of the caravan, along with two other men. They acquired large quantities of utensils and silver which was worth approximately 100,000 dirhams. The Holy Prophetsa took out Khumus and then distributed the remaining spoils between the army. The guide of the Quraish, Furat bin Hayan, accepted Islam at the hands of the Holy Prophetsa. (Al-Rahiq al-Makhtum [translated], p. 337, Maktabah Salafiyyah)

The remaining details of these accounts will be mentioned in the future, insha-Allah.

The reason for stopping these caravans was that they would use these trading goods to wage war against the Muslims. It is similar to the sanctions that are levied today. However, they [worldly powers] do so to achieve their vested interests and in fact, at times they are completely wrong. For example, the USA has imposed sanctions on Uganda because their Parliament passed a law against LGBT. Although they do not mention the reason but this is the true reality. This is the condition of these people, how then can they ever raise any allegations against Islam? Nonetheless, I will mention these matters in the future, God willing.

I would like to remind you once again to continue praying for the people of Palestine who are being oppressed.

Now, at least some non-Muslims and certain politicians, though timidly, have started speaking out against this injustice. Even some Jewish people are separating themselves from these actions and have called upon the Israeli government saying that they are defaming them. Hence, some voices here and there are being raised by even the non-Muslims.

Now it is being said that there will be a daily ‘pause’ in the fighting for four hours in order for aid to reach the people of Palestine. Allah the Almighty knows best the degree to which this will be implemented.

And Allah knows how much injustice and bombardment will take place against the Palestinians for the remaining 20 hours.

Majority of the major governments and politicians are not giving any importance to the lives of Palestinians. They have their own interests. However, these people should remember that Allah the Almighty gives respite only for a certain time. Furthermore, this is not the only life to be lived, there is also a hereafter.

They think that if they attain all the benefits of this world, they will have achieved everything. They can be seized in this world as well and will be seized in the hereafter as well.

In any case we must focus on prayers. May Allah the Almighty help the Palestinians, who are being oppressed and save them from these injustices.

I will also lead some funeral prayers in absentia after the prayers. The first funeral prayer is for Mansura Basma Sahiba, wife of Hameed-ul-Rahman Khan Sahib. She passed away recently:

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّاۤ اِلَيۡہِ رٰجِعُوۡنَ

[Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.]

She was the paternal granddaughter of Nawab Abdullah Khan Sahib and Hazrat Sahibzadi Amatul Hafeez Begum Sahibara. The deceased was the maternal granddaughter of Hazrat Sahibazada Mirza Sharif Ahmad Sahibra and Bu Zainab Begum Sahiba. She was the daughter of Mia Abbas Khan Sahib and Amatul Bari Begum Sahiba. By the grace of Allah, she was a musia and a very pious lady.

Whilst announcing her nikah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh delivered a sermon which contained various pieces of advice and so I will read a part of that sermon. Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh stated:

“With this nikah, certain responsibilities will be placed on both the girl and boy which they previously did not have. Firstly, there are responsibilities which they have towards each other; the husband has certain responsibilities towards his wife and, likewise, the wife has certain responsibilities towards her husband. Secondly, there are certain other responsibilities which they have to fulfil together which are in relation to their children. With regards to the responsibilities related to the children, there are certain responsibilities which are divided between the two. For example, the mother provides milk for the child; however, the father cannot do this. The father, however, looks after the child whilst outdoors so that the child does not pick up any immoral habits. The mother’s responsibilities are primarily related to the affairs within the home. In any case, if both parents fulfil their responsibilities, then our children can be safeguarded from many ills.”

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh further states: 

“The verses [of the Holy Quran] which we recite on this occasion draw our attention towards these new set of responsibilities. Firstly, Allah the Almighty states:

يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلنَّاسُ ٱتَّقُواْ رَبَّكُمُ

“‘O ye people! fear your Lord.’ [4:2]

“This verse mentions to fear God and although [the Quran] speaks of Taqwa [fear of God] in various contexts; however, in this particular verse of the Holy Quran, which is recited on the occasion of the nikah, it speaks about fearing the Lord. This means that just as Allah the Almighty is the Provider and gradually nurtures everything, including them, they too will now be given a new set of responsibilities of providing and nurturing which can only be fulfilled if they truly fear their Lord, Who is Allah. Secondly, this bond is very fragile. Many misunderstandings can develop due to negligence. Therefore, in order to be safeguarded from this, we have been instructed:

قُوۡلُوۡا قَوۡلًا سَدِيۡدًا

“‘And say the right word.’ [33:71]

“This means that it is not enough to just speak the truth, but to speak in a manner which is straightforward and unambiguous. If one adopts this habit then this will remove any misunderstandings or conflicts.

“Thirdly, it states:

 وَلۡتَنظُرۡ نَفۡسٞ مَّا قَدَّمَتۡ لِغَدٖ

“[And let every soul look to what it sends forth for the morrow. (59:19)]

“This means that their elders provided them with an upbringing for their future and now they too have to provide their children with a proper upbringing whilst keep their future in mind. The future of each generation, which is being mentioned in relation to parents providing an upbringing for their children, is independent and different. This is not relating to just one single future. This is because the world we live in and the society around us is constantly evolving. The current era has completely changed. The signs of the great revolution which we were always given glad tidings of can now be seen on the horizon. Thus, the responsibilities of a father today in this era are different to the ones that we had. In fact, they have to fulfil their responsibilities towards their children with much greater care and with a much wider scope, so that the future generations can be ready to shoulder the great weight of the responsibilities that are going to be placed on the Jamaat which relate to the training of the entire world. May Allah the Almighty enable us to understand this and act upon it.”

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh then stated:

“I am standing here to announce the nikah of a young girl, who is the paternal granddaughter of our paternal uncle, Nawab Abdullah Khan Sahib and our paternal aunt, Amatul Hafeez Begum Sahiba. Through this marriage, the fourth generation of the Promised Messiahas will begin. She is the maternal granddaughter of Hazrat Mirza Sharif Ahmad Sahibra and so she is related to the Promised Messiahas in two ways. Hence, the responsibilities are two-fold and if the responsibilities are two-fold then the warning is also two-fold just as the glad-tidings are two-fold for us.”

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh then mentioned to the elders as well as the children of the family of the Promised Messiahas that they should understand their responsibilities. If they fail to fulfil their two-fold responsibilities then they will have to face a two-fold admonishment as well. May Allah the Almighty enable the elders and children of the family [of the Promised Messiahas] to understand this. 

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh then said, “Whenever I announce a Nikah in which the boy and the girl are related to the Promised Messiahas then I also become concerned and become more focused on praying that Allah the Almighty enables them to recognise this status; because when it comes to being helpers [of the Promised Messiahas] they are different from others and therefore they should live their lives in this world as even greater servants [of faith].” (Khutbat-e-Nasir, Vol. 10, pp. 710-713, Khutbah Nikah October 1981)

In any case, these were his words of guidance and so I have mentioned them. Regarding her personal life, Basmah Mansura Sahiba’s daughter Rabia writes, “She introduced us to Allah the Almighty when we were young. She would stress that we pray for our good fortune. She would often say, ‘pray that Allah the Almighty causes you to be in the company of good people.’ We did not understand what this prayer meant when we were little, but came to understand it as we grew older.”

She further says, “My mother was very loving towards people. She would sacrifice her own sentiments in order to take care of others (this was indeed true). It may have appeared to people as if she spent on herself, but this was not the case, rather she herself would sacrifice and instead took care of others. For example, she would come to London for the Jalsa, and she would take gifts back for the poor and would not get anything for herself. She also took a young girl into her care and raised her, tended to her good moral training and then also had her married. In addition to her there are many girls who she helped get married. People would often visit her home. She would also send food to the neighbours. It was as if a sort of communal kitchen had been opened. This was to the extent that the man who swept the streets outside would come to her when it was time to eat and would have a meal. She had also set a stipend for many people. If ever she was advised to save something for herself she would say, ‘I have never thought about tomorrow. Allah the Almighty is the Master of my financial needs.’ She had a great deal of honour and respect for life-devotees and she would take care of her relatives who were life-devotees and would keep in touch with them as well.” She says, “She would also say to us that that life-devotees make sacrifices and so they should be taken care of. She did justice to all of her relations in an excellent manner.  She would always say that she never thought about how others have treated her. If ever she made a mistake or if ever she did wrong to someone she would always be the first to seek an apology. If ever she scolded a worker she would seek apology from them too and then she would give them a gift.”

Her son-in-law, Mirza Taqiuddin says, “She did Wasiyyat at a very young age.”

I also checked the Wasiyyat form and I was astonished to see that she had done Wasiyyat around the age of 14. He says, “She recounted a dream she had when she was a child; she saw in a dream that she was firmly holding on to Allah’s foot and crying profusely. She would said that when she woke up she was in fact crying. She would say, ‘Till now, Allah the Almighty has taken care of everything for me.’”

One of her acquaintances here, Ruhi Shah Sahiba says, “If she befriended someone then she honoured that friendship. She was a very grateful person. She was content with the will of Allah the Almighty and was always grateful to Him for His blessings. She was kind to others, and then she would express a great deal of gratitude, to the extent that the other person would become embarrassed.”

Her sister-in-law Tahira Farooq Sahiba says, “Rather than considering me a sister-in-law she treated me like a friend and sister. She loved selflessly and was a stand up individual. She knew how to honour her relations. She preferred for others exactly that which she preferred for herself and she never harboured any negative feelings in her heart. She was clear and straightforward in what she said. She was regular in offering prayers, keeping fasts, reciting the Holy Quran and she was firmly and deeply attached with Khilafat. She would happily take on any Jamaat work that was entrusted to her.”

May Allah the Almighty grant her His forgiveness and mercy and enable her children to carry on the legacy of her virtues. May He grant her husband and children patience and steadfastness.

The second funeral is of Chaudhary Rasheed Ahmad Sahib, former deputy registrar at the University of Agriculture in Faisalabad. He had currently been residing in the United States. He also passed away recently.

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّاۤ اِلَيۡہِ رٰجِعُوۡنَ

[Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.]

By the grace of Allah the Almighty he was also a Musi.

His son, Rafiq Tahir Sahib is serving the Jamaat in Los Angeles. He says that Ahmadiyyat first came into their family through the deceased’s older brother Chaudhary Barkat Ali Sahib, after which his father and the rest of his family had the honour of pledging allegiance. During the disturbances of 1974, his home which was within the university compound among the university quarters, was attacked by a mob and also attacked him and looted his home, setting fire to everything he had. In any case he left from there and returned to the university two to three months later when the conditions improved. The Vice-Chancellor said that the owner of the Crescent Mill said, “I wish to cover your losses. Tell me the extent of the damage.” Chaudhary Rasheed Sahib raised his finger towards the sky and said, “Absolutely not, I will not take help from anyone. I am bearing this loss in the way of Allah the Almighty. I suffered this loss for His sake and He Himself will cover the losses.” Allah the Almighty then bestowed such blessings upon him that within a short span of time, he was able to make up for the loss he endured. He had a relationship of great love and obedience with Khilafat. He strove to fulfil instructions to the letter. He was so trustworthy that he was a member of the university grant commission (this is a great honour). Once, there was a meeting and he had been given money to cover the expense of the train ticket to attend the meeting. On the way back, some of his family members said that they wished to accompany him, so he changed his ticket to second class in order to sit with his relatives and returned the remaining amount to the government. Once, he went to the university grant commission chairman’s office and he sent his card in order to meet him. The director came out and said to someone who was sitting outside, “This is the person whose trustworthiness I was telling you about how honest he is.” He immediately took this opportunity to introduce the Jamaat, saying that he was an Ahmadi and his trustworthiness was owing to him being an Ahmadi. Hence, this is a lesson for Ahmadis, that they should always fulfil their duties faithfully and they should never get caught up in any sort of financial greed. He was at the forefront of offering financial contributions and making financial sacrifices. Aside from his parents and siblings, he would regularly make contributions for Tahrik-e-Jadid and Waqf-e-Jadid on behalf of the Holy Prophetsa and the Promised Messiahas. He was a very loving person. He treated all the students at the university like his children and brothers. He says that they would all gather and offer one prayer [in a day] at his home, especially the Maghrib prayer. He would always meet others with a smile on his face. He was a very content person. May Allah the Almighty grant him His forgiveness and mercy and enable his children to carry on the legacy of his virtues.

(Official Urdu transcript published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 1 December 2023, pp. 2-7. Translated by The Review of Religions.)

Gratitude for blessings

0

“Indeed, showing compassion and empathy towards humanity is a significant form of worship and a powerful means to gain the pleasure of Allah the Exalted. However, I observe a notable weakness in this aspect. Others are often regarded as inferior and subjected to ridicule. Looking after them and assisting in their times of trouble and hardship seems to be a distant concern. I fear for those who do not treat the impoverished with kindness but rather deem them insignificant – they themselves might fall into such misfortunes. The true expression of gratitude for the blessings bestowed by Allah the Exalted is to treat His creation with kindness and benevolence. One must not become arrogant due to divine favours, nor should they oppress the poor like savages.”

(Al Hakam, 10 November 1905; Malfuzat [1988], Vol. 4, p. 439)

Opinion: China and the dilemma of Muslim nations in face of injustice

0
Fazal Masood Malik and Farhan Khokhar, Canada

Worldwide, the Muslim community is facing a highly unpredictable wave of opposition. Incidents that sometimes spark global outrage are, at other times, barely noticed, highlighting a worrying inconsistency. This, combined with a rising trend of extremism in Western democracies, with countries like Argentina and the Netherlands witnessing a growing right-wing zeal, presents a daunting challenge.

Consider the stark difference between the immediate international condemnation from Muslim countries following the recent Quran burnings in Sweden, and the lukewarm response to the distressing situation of the Uyghurs. This contrast is telling. Furthermore, the few Muslim voices that have spoken out against the troubles in Palestine have been largely silenced. This glaring inconsistency reveals a concerning lack of unity and moral fortitude among predominantly Muslim countries when it comes to standing up for Muslims facing persecution around the world.

Ultimately, short-term economic and political considerations have taken precedence over solidarity with fellow believers in East Turkestan (China) or Palestine. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which aims to represent the Muslim world, has repeatedly failed to address China’s crimes against the Uyghurs even as it reacted vigorously to the Swedish incident. In 2019, the OIC foreign ministers issued a joint statement disregarding the widespread repression of Uyghur Muslims, exemplifying the selective outrage that plagues Muslim nations regarding human rights abuses against Muslims.

China’s strategic leverage, wielded primarily through its economic clout and the promise of investment, has bred compliant silence from Muslim allies. Chinese economic penetration of the Gulf region and the importance of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects have entrapped key Muslim nations, including Iran, Qatar, Morocco and Iraq. Their lucrative codependence on China has muzzled any criticism of the regime’s oppressive policies in Xinjiang. The recent visit to the region by Arab League members further demonstrated the willingness of Muslim countries to toe China’s line in exchange for economic and diplomatic dividends.

Propaganda and media manipulation have also been pivotal in shaping favourable narratives among Muslim nations regarding China’s policies towards Uyghur Muslims. Chinese state media works closely with Middle Eastern outlets, while pro-China content reaches millions through conferences, speeches and social media campaigns aimed at Muslim audiences. By co-opting influencers and Islamic NGOs, China has manufactured an illusion of Uyghur contentment that much of the Islamic world seems willing to believe.

This crisis of unity and moral leadership within the Muslim world has profound implications. Firstly, the legitimacy of organisations like the OIC, which seem more devoted to political expedience than defending human rights, will continue to erode. Secondly, the economic dependence on China will further inhibit any principled stance supporting the Uyghurs. Finally, the perceived apathy towards Uyghurs will tarnish the global image of Muslim nations.

Rectifying this situation is critical for the Uyghur community, Palestinian community and Muslim solidarity worldwide. Muslim nations must acknowledge the overwhelming evidence of genocide rather than deny the facts on the ground. Coalitions like the OIC must reform their agenda to prioritise human rights advocacy over political or economic interests. Reducing economic dependence on China through trade diversification among the Muslim nations could also grant them more diplomatic flexibility and perhaps a backbone.

In the realm of Muslim geopolitics, the absence of a divinely guided Khilafat among non-Ahmadi Muslims represents a significant gap. This is especially apparent when considering the Ahmadi Muslim Community, where the Ahmadiyya Khilafat exemplifies an effective model of spiritual and organisational leadership. This Khilafat, functioning as a cohesive force, provides a living example of how such leadership can effectively guide a global Muslim community, addressing broader challenges and fostering collective welfare. The lack of this amongst non-Ahamdi Muslims results in Muslim groups and nations acting based on narrow state interests rather than the collective interests of the ummah. This is particularly evident in the operations of the OIC, a body united under the Islamic banner but fragmented by the diverse geopolitical realities of its member states. The recent Israel-Palestine conflict underscores this fragmentation, highlighting the OIC’s inability to present a united front against global injustices, especially those affecting the Muslim world.

The OIC’s challenges are not merely organisational but fundamentally ideological. The Quranic injunctions, which should guide the policies of Muslim nations, often take a backseat to nationalistic aspirations. This misalignment is starkly visible in conflicts like those in Syria, Yemen, and Sudan, where national interests have overshadowed the broader good of the Muslim ummah. Such a prioritisation fuels regional strife and contributes to global issues, such as the Uyghur crisis in China.

The only solution is the unification of the Muslim ummah under a spiritual rather than a political Khilafat. This approach advocates for alignment with Islamic teachings and the principles of justice, potentially mitigating conflicts and fostering global Muslim solidarity.

In the interim, as emphasised by Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, the focus for Muslims should be on prayer and advocacy for justice and unity. This spiritual commitment and adherence to Quranic principles will gradually pave the way for a more cohesive and just Muslim world. The journey is challenging, but the potential for a unified Muslim Nation, harmonised by faith, presents a compelling goal for the future.

Geert Wilders’ electoral ‘success’: What lies ahead? – Examining the causes, reactions, and potential consequences

0
Youssef Ikhlaf, Netherlands

Anti-Islam populist Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom (PVV) secured a substantial victory in the recent Dutch elections, positioning Wilders to lead talks for the next governing coalition, potentially making him the first far-right prime minister in the Netherlands. 

The unexpected outcome has sparked varied reactions and raised concerns about the future political landscape. However, the victory presents a challenge as mainstream parties are hesitant to form alliances with him. Talks to establish a new Dutch government started. Ronald Plasterk, a former Labour Party minister, has been appointed as the “scout” tasked with investigating coalition options. This decision comes after a tumultuous week in which the outgoing Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s conservative VVD (conservative-liberal party) ruled out participating in a government led by Wilders, thereby limiting the choices for the victorious party in the election. However, they are willing to support a centre-right government from the sidelines.

Wilders’ election ‘success’

With all votes counted, Wilders’ party for Freedom exceeded expectations, winning 37 seats in the 150-seat lower house of parliament. This victory more than doubled the 17 seats the party won in the last election, showcasing a significant shift in Dutch politics. (“Definitieve uitslag Kiesraad: PVV wint verkiezingen, één kandidaat met voorkeurstemmen gekozen (GL-PvdA)”, www.parlement.com)

Concerns and reactions of Islamic and Moroccan organizations

Muslim and Moroccan organizations, particularly SPIOR (Foundation Platform Islamic Organizations Rijnmond) and CMO (Contact Organization Muslims and Government) have voiced fear and profound concerns about the notable successes achieved by the PVV. They emphasize the increasing prevalence of Islamophobia and the potential consequences for the Muslim community in the Netherlands. Nourdin El Ouali, the director of SPIOR, said: “It is clearer than ever what the country stands for. Wilders has not become milder; the Netherlands has hardened. A piece of the mask of civilization in the Netherlands has fallen away.” (“Islamitische Nederlanders bezorgd na monsterzege PVV: ‘Angst is groot’”, www.rtlnieuws.nl)

Habib el Kaddouri of the Collaboration of Moroccan Dutch (SMN) said: “The dismay and fear are very significant.” Muhsin Köktas of the Contact Organization Muslims and Government (CMO) wonders if Muslims have a future in the Netherlands. He said: “Everyone talks about livelihood security, but I don’t know if we have it anymore.” (Ibid.)

Warning of the Head of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community 

Wilders is famous for saying, “I don’t hate Muslims. I hate Islam.” Ironically, to justify this hatred, he invariably attributes the evil actions of some misguided Muslims to the pristine teachings of Islam.

During a visit to Holland in 2011, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, the Head of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat, delivered a stern warning to Geert Wilders. Addressing Wilders directly, Hazrat Khalifatul Masihaa said: “Listen carefully […] No worldly power, no matter how powerful and no matter how much hatred they bear towards Islam, will ever succeed in erasing our religion.” (“World Muslim leader sends warning to dutch politician Geert Wilders”, www.alislam.org)

Huzooraa explained further: “Always remember, that we can achieve nothing without prayer. We have no worldly power, nor will we ever use any worldly force. But the prayers of people whose hearts have been grieved are enough to shake the Heavens.” (Ibid.)

Huzooraa also spoke of the many decent people who continued to live in Holland and who rejected wholeheartedly the extremist views perpetuated by Wilders. He said that all such people who care for the feelings of one another and who believe in religious freedom should come together and launch a campaign for peace in the world. This is something that the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat has long advocated and has been involved with throughout the world. 

The question now is, what was the reason for his election success?

Wilders’ recent response and attempt to address concerns

Despite his harsh rhetoric, Wilders has already begun reaching out to other right and centre parties, emphasising that his policies will remain within the bounds of the law and constitution. During the final weeks of the campaign, he softened his stance further, vowing to be a prime minister for all Dutch people, including Muslims. This shift in tone earned him the nickname Geert “Milders.”

He also once said, “The picture is more nuanced and if I were to become prime minister, I will be for all Dutch people, regardless of their religion.

Islam, so far a big issue for the party, is no longer a priority as far as Wilders is concerned. In a Dutch television program ‘Nieuwsuur’, he said Islam is not a priority now. “Other issues are more important.” He showed himself as a politician willing to “make compromises”. (“Wilders willing to step back anti-Islam rhetoric to be part of next government”, nltimes.nl

Pieter Omtzigt, leader of the new party NSC’s (New Social Contract) said that he doesn’t want to form a coalition in a new cabinet with the PVV at this moment. Omtzigt still sees objections to working with the PVV. He said Wilders announced, among other things, that he would put his views on Islam aside for the time being. But Omtzigt wants to know what he exactly means by that. 

Former VVD prime minister does not rule out that the Netherlands will have to go to the polls again. He reckons Geert Wilders’ PVV might not be able to form a coalition.

Factors influencing the election outcome

Several other factors played a role in shaping the election results. We will examine them one by one. The primary influencing factor is the vacuum created by the exit of the current Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, from the VVD in Dutch politics.

1. Migration – Dutch concerns about shelter and housing

The increasing immigration and the associated shortage of proper shelter and housing in the Netherlands were of great concern to the Dutch people. Wilders’ firm position on managing and restricting migration resonated with his voter base and like-minded people. He underscored the priority of Dutch citizens and advocated for putting a stop to additional immigration. (“Netherlands: Rising immigration and new government initiatives”, ec.europa.eu)

2. Unusual Muslim voter base

Wilders himself stated that many Muslims voted for him, which was quite unusual to hear. Some Turkish citizens expressed concerns about a new VVD leader of Kurdish-Turkish descent who opposed the headscarf and immigration, even though she, herself, immigrated in her childhood. This has led some to prefer Wilders. It also appears that Muslims who voted for him may have done so to protest against the aggressive climate policies and LGBTI+ policies of the left parties. (“Volgens Lalë Gul stemden veel allochtonen op Wilders: ‘Door links-progressieve partijen in de steek gelaten’”, nieuwrechts.nl)

3. The coercive nature of Europe’s influence

The coercive nature of Europe’s influence in the Netherlands has also contributed to votes for Wilders. For instance, the concerted effort by a significant majority in the European Parliament to eliminate national veto rights in 65 policy areas. This move goes beyond foreign policy, encompassing areas such as taxes and the EU budget. Consequently, it suggests a shift where decisions are increasingly being made in Europe rather than in The Hague. (“Geert Wilders: the anti-Islam leader vowing to ‘put the Dutch first’”, www.ft.com)

4. Strategic voting prompted by concerns about coalition partners and policies

Issues with other parties, including doubts about the new party NSC’s (New Social Contract) role and dissatisfaction with VVD’s policies, influenced strategic voting in favour of the PVV. The NSC bears similarities to traditional parties that have left people with unfavourable experiences. For example, the NSC supports Ukraine which the Dutch people don’t like. Additionally, strategic voting played a significant role, with voters strategically casting their votes based on concerns about coalition partners and policies. 

5. Cultural conservatism and economic policies

Wilders’ success is also attributed to a significant portion of the Dutch population being culturally conservative while also leaning economically left. The Party for Freedom’s policies on immigration and advocating for an involved government in areas like healthcare resonated strongly with this voter base. (“Geert Wilders’ win shows the far right is being normalised. Mainstream parties must act”, www.theguardian.com)

6. Focus on cultural identity

Examining the 46-page election programme of the Party for Freedom reveals a strong emphasis on cultural identity. The repeated use of the words “Netherlands” and “Dutch” underscores the party’s commitment to preserving national identity, a sentiment that resonated well with voters. (“Waar staat de PVV eigenlijk voor? ‘Nederlander weer op één’”, www.ad.nl)

7. Political theatrics in televised debate

During a televised debate on SBS6, a woman on welfare highlighted her struggle with the €375 deductible. Frans Timmermans responded with a promise to fight for improvement, but Geert Wilders seized the opportunity to criticize Timmermans for receiving €16,000 per month in severance pay, while not offering a clear solution to the lady. While not offering a clear solution, Wilders’ cunning move gained applause, showcasing his attempt to score points in the final stages of the campaign. This unfortunately indicates that people were ultimately more influenced by superficial appearances than by substantive viewpoints. (“Geert Wilders steelt show tijdens SBS-debat en grapt over gewicht Timmermans”, www.youtube.com)

Conclusion

In conclusion, Geert Wilders’ electoral triumph reflects a complex interplay of factors, including concerns over migration, strategic voting, and societal anxieties. The analysis has explored Wilders’ response to concerns, factors influencing the election outcome, and the potential consequences of his political ascension. “RTL Nieuwspanel: immigratie belangrijkste reden voor stem op Wilderswww.rtlnieuws.nl

As coalition talks unfold, this article has delved into the uncertainties surrounding the far-right’s increased influence in Dutch society. The coming weeks will provide clarity on the direction the Netherlands may take under the potential leadership of Geert Wilders. But one thing, which Huzooraa said back in 2011, is certain. He said, Listen carefully […] No worldly power, no matter how powerful, and no matter how much hatred they bear towards Islam, will ever succeed in erasing our religion.” (“World Muslim leader sends warning to Dutch politician Geert Wilders”, www.alislam.org)

Polygamy: The case of Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Sahib

0
Asif M Basit, Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre, London

Polygamy remains one of the permissible practices of Islam brought under strict scrutiny by the modern Western world. The primary criticism rests on modern moral standards which again are set by none else but the West.

Before looking at how the provision of polygamy emerged in Islam, it is important to understand the moral standards of pre-Islamic Arabia – a melting pot of various religions and their ethics, and also of the absence of both.

Where men would feel free to take as many women as they liked, even without any legal marital contract, Islam emerged with strict rules on marriage and the maximum number of women that could be taken into a legal matrimonial contract at a time.

This is agreed by historians as one of the revolutionary social standards set by Islam in its contemporaneous world.

In a time when peace was only established through military conflicts, scores of female prisoners of war posed another threat to society by being seen as a class that was a free-for-all commodity. Where pre-Islamic society saw illegitimate births and diminished parental responsibility through this class of women, Islam provided a legal framework for men to take ownership of such women by upholding their rights, should a man decide to take one or more of them as concubines.

Hence it can justifiably be said that Islam, through polygamy, imposed restrictions on a primitive society that thrived on free-sex, just as much as the modern Western world does. This leaves one wondering whether modern society is opposed to polygamy as a mode of free-sex, or, on the contrary, a restriction on any such modes.

A society where men and women can cohabit without any legal contract and feel free to have children, and part their ways when they like can only be critical of Islamic polygamy for the reason that it restricts, and not that it allows such freedom.

That Islam takes into account the psyche of men and women in its permissibility of polygamy is another debate which is important to this brief study. The stark difference in the functionality of male and female sex-drives is a factor that cannot be ignored when discussing polygamy in its historical context, just as much as it cannot be ignored with reference to modern society.

Even in early Islam, permission and injunction were always weighed in to maintain the equilibrium of the social structure. Mutah, or temporary marriage, remained permissible in Islam but was forbidden at or around the time of the Battle of Khyber (c. 628CE).

Similarly, polygamy was never seen as an injunction for Muslim men, but more as a permission to facilitate the shunning of moral vices that could potentially develop into social evils. The Holy Quran, when issuing permissibility, clarifies that upholding justice among all wives is paramount, and also that this justice is not an easy goal to achieve.

As mentioned earlier, conflict and war remained a permanent feature of the early days of Islam. While women were not permitted to actively participate in combat, men remained away from home on military expeditions. This meant that they were away from their wives for long periods of time. No other means of satisfying carnal desires were permissible in Islamic teachings other than by way of nikah, or announcement of marital contract, between a man and a woman.

However, in the time of Hazrat Umarra, the Second Caliph of Prophet Muhammadsa, it was felt that married men and women should not be kept apart for longer than four months. Tradition has it Hazrat Umarra, having overheard a sad song of a woman longing for her husband who was at war, did not hesitate to approach his own daughter Hafsah and ask how long a woman could reasonably live without her husband. It was upon her reply that he decreed that men were not to be kept away on the battlefield for longer than four months. 

However, marriages of Muslim men, including those of the Prophetsa himself, have remained a favourite area of debate for modern historians of Islam. One of the well-known marriages hugely criticised is that of Khalid ibn al-Walid with the widow of Malik ibn Nuwayrah. He is criticised for having killed ibn Nuwayrah to marry his wife which, Islamically speaking, would be an un-Islamic act. Historical data suggest that this was far from the truth, but, unfortunately, we live in times where scandal is held higher than plain truth.

Colonial West and Polygamy

Western Christendom remains to this day behind many norms of the modern Western world. Despite the population of the modern West steadily turning away from faith and giving up any religious belief systems, certain Christian phenomena still dictate its social dynamics. Festivity remains rooted in Christian concepts of Christmas, Easter, Harvest and Thanksgiving etc. 

The West’s strict aversion towards polygamy can also be traced back to the Western Christendom while arguments given against it are those given in favour of a free society where no form of legal contract is required for a man and woman to cohabit. Western legal systems, inspired by Christian ideals, have seen polygamy as a crime on the grounds that “it fosters inequity, confuses children, and jeopardizes marital consent”. (John Witte Jr, The Western Case for Monogamy over Polygamy, Cambridge University Press, NY and Cambridge, 2015)

The fact that the same does not apply to cohabiting, where couples live together without any marital contract, having children out of wedlock, and the confusion of the latter over parental ownership is a clear indication that the West has got it all wrong in understanding the concept of Islamic polygamy. 

John Witte Jr, in his detailed work The Western Case for Monogamy over Polygamy, highlights how the balance in the West is tilting more towards polygamy. He believes that “polygamy will come to dominate public deliberation and litigation in many Western countries in the near future”. (Ibid)

Gallup survey shows that in America alone, the tide seems to be turning where the moral acceptability of polygamy is witnessing a constant uptick. From 7% in 2004, the trajectory of moral acceptability has gone up to 20% in 2020, and is still creeping upwards.

The Case of Mufti Sadiq Sahib

Speaking of America, we take the case of Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Sahib, the first Muslim missionary to arrive in modern America in 1920. 

As soon as Mufti Sadiq Sahib set foot on American soil, he was detained by immigration authorities on account of being a Muslim who would preach polygamy. He had to assure the authorities that polygamy was an option in Islam and not an obligation. He also wrote to newspapers to have his voice heard, one of which was the Evening Public Ledger:

“I am detained because I must show my authority as an Ahmadi preacher […] and because I come from a country and nation which allows polygamy. I am going to appeal. I am not a polygamist myself, having only one wife, who is in India with our four children […]” (Evening Public Ledger, Philadelphia, 20 February 1920)

This one wife of his was Imam Bibi whom he had married in India, as we understand from his various biographical accounts. (Zikr-i-Habib [an autobiographical account], Mufti Muhammad Sadiq, p. 173)

The Ipswich Star, on 19 November 2023, has published an account by some newfound grandchildren of Mufti Sadiq with evidence that he married their grandmother, Ethel Maud Bassett, during his stay in England (1917 – January 1920). He also fathered her child, Frederick A Bassett, who was born in May 1920 – about five months after his departure from England to America. 

The family, in their quest for their grandfather, have collected a number of documents to piece the jigsaw together. Many pieces, however, remain missing. Also in their possession are a number of letters written by Mufti Sadiq to his son Frederick – whom he addresses with the Muslim name Farid – where he fondly advises his long-lost son about good and bad, dos and don’ts of life. 

In February 1947, Mufti Sadiq sent his “dear son Farid” a book that he had recently authored, titled “Lataif-i-Sadiq” (anecdotes of Sadiq). He also advises him that being in the Urdu language, he might not be able to read it. However, we know from other father-to-son letters that Mufti Sadiq advised his son to visit the Fazl Mosque in London and meet with the missionary Mushtaq Bajwa Sahib; we know from the letters that he did. So, Frederick could have had the book read if he chose to do so. 

Frederick might not have known Urdu, but the author can confirm that this autobiographical account of Mufti Sadiq carries no mention of Frederick’s mother, Ethel.

This, combined with his statement that he only had one wife who was in India, suggests that the marriage between Ethel Bassett and Mufti Sadiq might have only been a very short episode.

Since some demand legal registry documents to prove marriage, it must be clarified that the only requirement of marriage in Islam is nikah – a public announcement before two witnesses that a man and woman have agreed to live together as husband and wife, under a matrimonial contract. 

The same applies to divorce in both Islamic modes – talaq where a husband divorces the wife, or khula’ where a wife divorces the husband. It has to be publicly announced that the two are breaking the wedlock and will no longer be living together as man and wife. 

There are, however, legal requirements that ensue a divorce where the husband is required the dowry in the case of talaq or that the woman cannot be divorced if pregnant at the time.

Frederick was born on 20 May 1920 which is exactly five months after Mufti Sadiq’s departure for America (January 1920). This means that Ethel must have been four-months-pregnant at the time of his departure. 

Mufti Sadiq’s statement to the authorities and open letters to the American press suggest that he was not in nikah with Ethel, nor was he aware that she was pregnant with his child. But since the pregnancy must have happened while they were Islamically in nikah, it means that the divorce must have happened in the preceding four months, but right at the very onset of the pregnancy when both were unaware that she had conceived. 

Another hypothesis suggests that if they were aware of the pregnancy, Ethel must have exercised her Islamic right to divorce by way of khula’

Whatever the case, Mufti Sadiq’s statement makes it clear that he was only married to Imam Bibi at the time of his arrival at the American port. Had he arrived in America with the intention to marry American women, he had no reason to plainly declare his marriage in India, especially at a time when there were no means for facts to be verified by American authorities.

The only assurance that the American authorities required was that Mufti Sadiq would not preach or practice polygamy while in America. Whether he was polygamous already or not was not the question. 

Moreover, had he intended to be polygamous in America, marriage to Ethel would have been a perfect precedent to present to American immigration control – more so with a child on the way.

Also suggesting that the marriage with Ethel had ended in divorce is the birth registration of Frederick where he is listed with the surname “Bassett”. In his baptism certificate, in the column asking for parents’ name, the only name given is “Ethel Maud Bassett”.

Screenshot 20231201 221036
England and Wales Civil Registration Birth Index 1916-2007. Courtesy of www.ancestry.co.uk
Screenshot 20231201 221051
London, Church of England Births and Baptisms, 1813-1923.

Had the marriage been still on, there was no reason for Ethel not to give Mufti Sadiq’s name as the father of the child. Even in the case of a divorce, there was no apparent reason to conceal the father’s name.

In light of what we know so far, Ethel abandoned Frederick by sending him to an orphanage-style care system of Barnardo’s, which is evident from the documents in possession of Frederick’s children and published by Ipswich Star

But this happened later on. From the time of his birth, Frederick was deprived of his true identity by concealing his father’s name. He was baptised, despite the fact that Ethel Bassett had converted to Islam, confirmed by Mufti Sadiq’s report published in the Al Fazl Qadian, on 10 June 1919, where it said:

“Two respectable ladies, by the names of Ms Bassett and Mrs Sals have accepted Islam at the hand of Hazrat Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Sahib, missionary of Islam. Their Muslim names are Majidan and Fatimah. Praise be to Allah.”

The Review of Religions, in its issue of May, June, July 1919 published the same in English:

“Five English Ladies and Gentlemen joined the fold of Islam in the month of May. Their names are Miss E Maud Besset [sic.], Mrs Alice Sals, Mrs Gurr, Miss Bysouth, and Mr Scott.

“They have been respectively given the Muslim names of Majidan, Alia, Amina, Mariam and Abraham, and their applications for initiation into the Ahmadia Movement have been forwarded to His Hazrat Khalifat-ul-Masih.”

The above report, published in the Al Fazl of 10 June 1919, is dated 7 May 1919. We can safely assume that Ethel converted to Islam sometime in early May. The marriage must have happened in the Summer of 1919 before she conceived Frederick around September (counting back from his birth in May 1920).

It is around the same time that marriage seems to have fallen apart. No one can say for sure, but the little amount of evidence that we have supports the assumption that Ethel abandoned Islam and her husband who was also the father of her unborn child. The evidence the author uses here is the baptism certificate of Frederick A Bassett (baptism dated 24 August 1920).

Had Ethel remained a Muslim, Baptism would have not been anywhere in the equation. The same applies to the name Frederick which is very much a Christian name and not a Muslim one.

That Mufti Sadiq later made effort to establish contact with his son Frederick, fondly addressing him as Farid, shows that he did not abandon his child. The mother of the child seems to have kept him from making any contact with the father. 

While there is no registry document to prove the legal marriage of Mufti Sadiq and Ethel Maud Bassett, there is sufficient evidence to believe that Islamic marriage did take place. The letters written to Frederick by Mufti Sadiq advise him to visit the Fazl Mosque in Southfields, London, and stay in contact with the missionary there. Letters suggested that he visited the mosque and remained in touch with the mosque before losing contact. 

Had there been no nikah and the child was born out of wedlock, Mufti Sadiq would never have made any effort to, firstly, find this child of his and, secondly, to get him in touch with the mosque where everyone knew Mufti Sadiq as their pioneering missionary and held him in very high esteem. 

The story of Mufti Sadiq and his son Frederick is a sad one. It hurts to see that ever since the publication of the article in Ipswich Star, some Social Media users have been using foul language about this child, his mother and his father.

They lived in a time when life was much different than as know it today. Ethel was not a bad lady. Mufti Sadiq’s report published in the aforementioned issue of The Review of Religions mentions her as someone who was helping Mufti Sadiq in his missionary activity. He writes:

“I am still suffering from granular eyelids which has rendered me unable to do any reading or writing work. Some English Muslim friends (such as Mrs Jameela Shah, Mrs Abasi and Miss Besset [sic.] and Abdul Rahim Alabi Smith, a young Nigerian Ahmadi, have been of great help in disposing of my correspondence. May God be their reward.”  (The Review of Religions, May, June, July 1919, p. 229)

We can only wonder what might have led Ethel (or Majidan) away from Islam. Those were very challenging times for Muslims living in the West. In the book that Mufti Sadiq sent to his son in London, he narrates a very interesting anecdote:

“A tough situation arose for Mufti Sahib in America, but God saved him miraculously. Mufti Saheb had been preaching Islam to a young American girl who was almost ready to accept the message. Her mother was a bigoted and stubborn woman who tried to stop her daughter from converting to Islam through every possible effort. Having failed, she filed a false lawsuit against Mufti Sahib, accusing him of being part of a dangerous mission where girls are abducted and then married off to Muslim men; and that the same was happening to her daughter. 

“The lawsuit was horrific but was dismissed in its very early stages, hence relieving Mufti Sahib of a burdensome worry.” (Lataif-i Sadiq (being the autobiography of Mufti Sadiq Sahib), ed. Sheikh Muhammad Ismael Panipati, published by Tajir Kutab Qadian, 1946)

Such were the times when being Muslim was a thorn in the West’s eye. The resilience of Muslim missionaries becomes even more commendable in such circumstances. 

Their families shared the burden of their sacrifice and must have received their share in the rewards from God Almighty.

Note from author: The above is based on the data and information so far available. As more comes to light, further reseach will be carried out and presented.

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 64: Abu Talib, inheritance and financial equity, Tawhid

Guidance regarding basic Islamic issues – which Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa has given on various occasions in his written correspondence and during MTA programmes – is being officially published below for everyone’s benefit.

Click here for Part 63

photo1701302549 scaled
Wiki Commons

Faith and fate of Hazrat Abu Talib

Someone wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, stating, “I hold special affection for Hazrat Abu Talib because he protected the Holy Prophetsa throughout his life and stood by him during the most challenging times. How could such a person not be a Muslim?”

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 24 August 2022, provided the following guidance in response to this question:

“Hazrat Abu Talib provided extraordinary support and protection to the Holy Prophetsa and did not abandon him even during the painful period of confinement in the Shi‘b Abi Talib. Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Promised Messiahas, who was the greatest lover, the most ardent devotee, and the spiritual son of the Holy Prophetsa, stated the following while reflecting upon the compassionate behaviour and attitude of Hazrat Abu Talib and while mentioning an incident involving the antagonism directed towards the Holy Prophetsa by the disbelievers of Mecca and the support he received from Hazrat Abu Talib:

“‘When these verses were revealed, declaring the polytheists as impure, foul, the worst of creation, foolish, and progeny of Satan, with their gods as fuel for the Fire and firewood of Hell, Abu Talib called the Holy Prophetsa and said, ‘O my nephew, your vilification has deeply angered the people. They are likely to kill you and me as well. You have called their intellectuals foolish and their elders the worst of creation. You have termed their revered gods as fuel for the Fire and firewood for Hell and their entire populace as impure and progeny of Satan. I counsel you with goodwill to restrain your tongue and desist from this vilification; otherwise, I have no strength to face the people.’ In response, the Holy Prophetsa said, ‘O uncle, this is not vilification but a statement of facts, presented in the most appropriate and befitting manner, and that is the very purpose for which I have been sent. If this leads to my death, I gladly accept it. My life is committed to this path. I cannot desist from expressing the truth out of fear of death. O uncle, if you are concerned about your own vulnerability and inconvenience, then you are welcome to withdraw your support. By God, I have no need for it. I will never stop conveying God’s commands; they are dearer to me than life itself. By God, if I am killed in this path, I would wish to be resurrected and killed again and again. This does not cause me any fear; rather, I derive immense pleasure in facing hardship in this path.’  As the Holy Prophetsa was speaking, his face was radiating truth and luminosity, while he was also being overwhelmed by emotions. When he concluded, Abu Talib was moved to tears by the evident light of truth and said, ‘I was unaware of this lofty state of yours. You are indeed in a different realm and stature. Go, pursue your mission. As long as I live, and within my means, I will stand by you.’

“‘This entire content, although part of Abu Talib’s story recorded in books, is divinely inspired which God has revealed to this humble servant. Only a few phrases are added by me for explanatory purposes. This inspired statement clearly illustrates Abu Talib’s compassion and empathy; however, it establishes with absolute certainty that this empathy was born after witnessing the Holy Prophet’ssa prophetic light and steadfastness.’ (Izala-e-Auham, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 3, pp.110 to 112 and footnote)

“Thus, Hazrat Abu Talib extended his utmost support to the Holy Prophetsa to the extent that he was willing to face the opposition of his own tribe for the sake of the Holy Prophetsa. However, he did not renounce the religion of his people, and despite the insistence of the Holy Prophetsa, he refrained from proclaiming the kalimah to affirm monotheism [Tawhid]. Hence, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra writes regarding what happened upon the complaint of the chieftains of Mecca, who had advised Hazrat Abu Talib to deter the Prophetsa from his mission, the Holy Prophet’ssa response thereto, and Hazrat Abu Talib’s eventual announcement of his support for the Holy Prophetsa:

“‘The significance of Abu Talib’s response cannot be fully comprehended by those who are not acquainted with history, for they are unaware of another incident that sheds light on Abu Talib’s emotional state and reveals how deeply he loved his tribe. When the time of his demise drew near, the Holy Prophetsa, who had immense love for him due to his sacrifices and benevolent conduct, was profoundly distressed that he would die without embracing Islam. The Holy Prophetsa would sit beside him, sometimes on his right, sometimes on his left, urging, ‘O Uncle! The time of death is near; please pronounce ‘لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّهُ مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ’ [There is none worthy of worship except Allah and Muhammad is His Messenger.].’ However, Abu Talib remained silent and offered no response. Ultimately, the Holy Prophetsa insisted vehemently; being overwhelmed by emotions, and he would repeatedly urge, ‘O Uncle! Just pronounce the kalimah once, so that I may testify before God that you accepted Islam.’ However, in the end, Abu Talib replied that he could not abandon the religion of his people. In other words, his love for his tribe was so intense that he did not even desire Heaven without them. A man who held such intense love for his tribe was so affected by the courageous response of the Holy Prophetsa that he declared, ‘Fine, if my tribe forsakes me, let them. I will not forsake you.’’ (Khutbat-e-Mahmud, Vol. 17, p. 264, 1 May 1936)

“Thus, on the one hand, Hazrat Abu Talib supported the Holy Prophetsa  until his final moments; yet, on the other hand, despite acknowledging the veracity of the Prophetsa and his faith, he refrained from pronouncing the kalimah to affirm the Oneness of God [Tawhid]. Considering this in the light of God Almighty’s justice and equity, the Prophetsa expressed the hope that on the Day of Judgment, his intercession might offer some benefit to Hazrat Abu Talib. He said it is hoped that Abu Talib will be placed in the intermediate level of the Fire, which will rise only up to his ankles, causing his brain to boil. Had I not existed, he would have been in the lowest level of Hell. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab manaqibi l-ansar, Bab qissati abi talib)

“In this world, we observe that when a person commits a crime and is sentenced to prison according to the severity of their crime, some receive lesser and others more severe sentences. Similarly, Hell has been created as a punishment for the mistakes and sins committed in this world, and there too, each individual will have to endure punishment for a lesser or greater period, in accordance with the extent of their errors and sins. Hence, in discussing Hell, one should also remember that, as explicitly stated in the Holy Quran and ahadith of the Holy Prophetsa, it serves a function akin to that of a hospital, where sinners are sent for treatment. Now, just as in a hospital, patients seeking treatment for cancer are admitted alongside those receiving minor first aid; similarly, the statement of the Holy Prophetsa should be understood in the same vein. Those opponents of Islam who tirelessly worked day and night to counteract and eradicate it, applying all their might and resources in hostility, will go to Hell much like a person afflicted with a grievous illness goes to a hospital and stays there for an extended period. Conversely, Hazrat Abu Talib’s placement in Hell can be likened to a person who goes to a hospital for a minor wound, receives the necessary dressing, and then promptly returns home.

“As for Hazrat Abu Talib, although he was born during a period of polytheism and despite the Holy Prophet’ssa earnest endeavours and wishes, did not proclaim the Oneness of God, he was not ensnared in the kind of polytheism practised by those who were outright enemies of Tawhid and Allah the Exalted. These people would openly express their polytheism and were engrossed day and night in opposing Allah and His Messengersa. Therefore, due to his virtuous nature and his support and assistance to the Holy Prophetsa, Hazrat Abu Talib will neither serve as fuel for Hell like the enemies of Allah nor will he remain there for an extended period. Yes, for a brief period, just as one who suffers from a minor illness may go to the hospital for some time, Hazrat Abu Talib may also face the fire of Hell briefly for treatment. This fact has been articulated in the statement of the Holy Prophetsa.”

Islamic inheritance laws and financial equity between men and women

photo1701302549 1 scaled
Image: Library

A lady from the UK sent a question to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, asking, “The reason why a son receives double the share of a daughter in inheritance is that the son is responsible for the expenses of his parents, wife, and children. However, nowadays both husband and wife work. Similarly, if a daughter is unmarried, divorced, or separated through talaq or khul‘ and living alone, she does not receive anything from the man. Additionally, some sons do not take on the responsibility of their parents, whereas daughters, working and earning, shoulder the household responsibilities. I believe it is necessary to clarify these matters so that any woman’s right is not infringed upon.”

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 22 August 2022, provided the following guidance on this issue:

“The first point to understand is that the teachings of Islam are perpetually lasting, immutable, and as practicable for every era as they were during the blessed time of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. This is because the Being Who revealed these teachings is fully aware of all the changes and events that have occurred and will occur in the universe from the beginning to the Day of Judgement. The same Being has also taken the responsibility for the protection of these teachings. Therefore, to say ‘the teachings of Islam were practicable in olden times, but now, as women have started working and taking on household responsibilities, there is a need to change these Islamic teachings’, is a frivolous and inappropriate statement.

“Regarding the matter of women owning property or taking on household responsibilities, it is not a phenomenon unique to this era. Even in ancient times and during the blessed era of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa, there were women of substantial wealth who spent their resources on their husbands and children. However, they never raised the question that, since they were spending on their husbands and children, they should receive an equal share of inheritance as men do. For instance, Hazrat Khadijahra was a wealthy woman who, after marriage, entrusted all her wealth and property to the Holy Prophetsa. (Allamah Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, al-Tafsir al-Kabir, under verse 9 of Surah ad-Duha; ‘wa wajadaka ‘a’ilan fa aghna’) Similarly, the Companion, Hazrat Abdullah bin Mas‘udra, who was a poor labourer, had a wealthy wife, Hazrat Zainabra, who used to spend from her wealth on her husband and children. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-zakah, Bab az-zakati ‘ala z-zawji wa l-aytami fi l-hajr)

“The notion that ‘since women have started working, the responsibility of household expenses has shifted from the husband to the wife’ is also incorrect. According to Islamic teachings, irrespective of whether the wife owns property or is employed, the responsibility for providing for the children’s lodging, clothing, and food lies with the husband, and he is bound to fulfil these responsibilities according to his capacity. The husband has no right over the property or income of his wife. However, a husband has the authority to allow his wife to work if he is adequately providing for the needs of his wife and children. If the husband does not agree to his wife’s employment, Islam grants him the right to prevent her from working. However, if the wife is working with her husband’s permission and consent, all her earnings belong solely to her, and the husband has no right to control or use her income. Islam has carefully considered the rights and responsibilities of both husband and wife at every turn. Accordingly, the responsibility for external affairs, including the provision of sustenance for the wife and children, has been entrusted to the husband by Allah Almighty. Domestic responsibilities (which include safeguarding household property, meeting the husband’s needs, and nurturing the children) have been assigned to the wife by Allah the Exalted.

“The point you made about granting a woman who has not married, or is divorced [talaq], or has obtained khul‘, an equal share in inheritance as a man, is also not correct. This is so because if a man has not married, or if he has divorced his wife, or if his wife has obtained khul‘, then he also does not receive anything from his wife’s inheritance. Generally, in the case of talaq and sometimes in the case of khul‘, the husband has to pay the wife her dowry [mahr], whereas, in the event of talaq or khul‘, the wife does not have to pay anything to her husband.

“In today’s Western-influenced society, women often have the misconception that their rights are being usurped in every aspect and situation. Islamic teachings provide a complete and eternal system based on equitable rights and responsibilities. There is no need for any kind of change in these teachings.”

Tawhid: Allah’s Oneness and other attributes in the basmala

photo1701302549 3 scaled
Muhammad Amaan | Unsplash

Someone from the USA wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, asking, “Surah al-Fatiha begins with ‘بِسۡمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الرَّحِيۡمِ’ [In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.], which mentions God Almighty’s personal name, Allah, and two of His attributes. However, why aren’t the attributes of ‘al-Ahad’ [Unique] or ‘al-Wahid’ [One] mentioned therein, given that the purpose of the Holy Quran’s teaching is to establish the Oneness of God Almighty?”

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 31 August 2022, provided the following reply to this query:

“The distinctive feature of Islam is the manner in which it introduces humankind to the concept of Tawhid (Oneness of God), unlike any other religion. The personal name of God Almighty, ‘Allah’, is the root of Tawhid, encompassing within itself all the divine attributes. Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Promised Messiahas, states regarding this matter:

“‘In the terminology of the Quran, ‘Allah’ is the name of the Being in Whom all the attributes of beauty and benevolence have reached their pinnacle of perfection, and there is no flaw in His entity. The Holy Quran attributes all divine qualities exclusively to the name of Allah, indicating that the name ‘Allah’ is truly realised when all perfect attributes are found within it.’ (Ayyam-us-Sulh, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 14, p. 247)

“Thus, the Holy Quran commences with the personal name of God Almighty, ‘Allah’, in the most beautiful manner, incorporating the attribute of His Unity within it. The Promised Messiahas further states:

“‘‘Allah’ is translated as that God, or that Being Who is beyond perception, transcending all intellect, beyond the beyond, and intricately unfathomable and subtle, towards Whom, everything turns in a state of worshipful hue, that is, in a state of existential annihilation—either a metaphorical annihilation in Divine love, which is a spiritual state, or an actual annihilation, which is death. (Tuhfa-e-Golarwiyya, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 268)

“Thus, the word ‘Allah’ itself articulates this notion, proclaiming God Almighty’s Oneness, His uniqueness as the Sole Deity, and declaring that no one is a partner in His Divinity.

“Furthermore, it is not imperative for every verse of the Holy Quran to explicitly mention the attribute of God’s Unity. The Holy Quran is a complete book that, along with establishing the Oneness of God Almighty, also extensively elucidates the other attributes of the True God for its followers. Otherwise, this objection would also apply to the last two chapters of the Quran, where only the attributes of Lord [Rab], Master [Malik], and God [Ilah] are mentioned, and the attributes of the Unique [al-Ahad] or the One [al-Wahid] are not explicitly stated.

“The Holy Quran is a complete heavenly book which, alongside the apt elucidation of all attributes of God Almighty, through its teachings, impact, reformative power, and spiritual essence, rescues its true adherents from every sin and corrupt life, bestowing upon them a life of purity. Additionally, the Holy Quran imparts perfect insight for the recognition of God Almighty, nurtures a relationship of love with Him, and guides the seeker of God to their ultimate destination.”

(Compiled by Zaheer Ahmad Khan, Head of Records Department, Private Secretariat, London. Translated by Al Hakam.)

Unity, sacrifice and tabligh: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’s advice to Muslim youth and journalists during a press conference in Karachi, 1950

Ata-ul-Haye Nasir, Al Hakam
Karachi Press Conference 12 Sep 1950 1 1 scaled
Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra speaking at a press conference in Karachi, 12 September 1950

On 12 September 1950, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud, Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra addressed a press conference at the Central Hotel in Karachi, Pakistan.

Huzoorra called on the Muslim world to unite and emphasised the need to propagate the message of Islam. Later on, Huzoorra responded to the questions of press correspondents as well.

In the beginning, Huzoorra said that there is a kind of awakening among contemporary Muslims and they are making efforts to eradicate those dangers that have been suppressing them for a long time; however, at this moment, this is merely their national awakening, not the religious one. No doubt, there are some Muslims who dream about a united Muslim world, but their aspirations are currently superficial and they have not made any real efforts to turn it into a reality. The spirit of sacrifice is not found behind these aspirations. Mere desires, without any determination, can never help one attain their objectives. Muslim countries are not ready to sacrifice their own interests for the bigger cause, i.e., the unity of the Muslim world.

Huzoorra continued by saying that the Western nations have looked upon Islam with huge disrespect and distrust. In such circumstances, Huzoorra said, his message for the Muslim youth in general and journalists in particular is that they are required to study Islam thoroughly and to inculcate its teachings within themselves so much so that their writings begin to manifest the magnificence of those teachings. As a result, non-Muslims would become aware of the beauty of Islamic teachings. They need to exchange thoughts about the teachings of Islam with their co-professionals, particularly in regard to aspects of what Islam teaches in relation to the followers of other religions.

Huzoorra expressed his firm belief that if the Muslim youth acted upon this advice, the misconceptions spread against Islam would be removed within a few years’ time.

1erfuzr
Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra at a press conference in Karachi, 12 September 1950

Emphasising the need for Muslim unity, Huzoorra said that the Muslim countries are keeping in mind their own interests and desires; however, the Muslim world needs to unite politically, socially, culturally, and economically. The only way to achieve the Muslim world’s unity is to inculcate a spirit of sacrifice for each other.  

Huzoorra said that the Muslim world needs to take the necessary steps, but very cautiously, and to instil a strong determination to achieve its objectives. If they do so, Huzoorra said, then the day is not far away when the Muslim world will be united.

Huzoorra said that it is the birthright of Muslims to strive for their rights. The Muslim world is required to realise this need of the time and to instil within them a passion and enthusiasm for Muslim unity. In addition, Muslims are required to propagate the teachings of Islam to the non-Muslims in all corners of the world.

In regards to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat’s services for the propagation of Islam, Huzoorra said that Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya is making efforts to propagate the message of Islam the world over, and its missions are established in various Christian countries, such as America, England, France, Holland, Germany, Switzerland, and in many West African countries as well. Many Christians have accepted Islam through the tabligh efforts of Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya, and some of those new Muslims have devoted their lives to the service of Islam as well. 

Huzoorra continued by saying that this age of materialistic advancement could not undermine the reality that whenever worldly power clashed with the truth, the ultimate victor had been the truth.

Advising the Muslims, Huzoorra said that if they wish to succeed, they need to pay special attention to propagating the golden principles of Islam in non-Muslim countries. The man-made laws can never be perfect at all. The reality is that the laws and principles made by God Almighty are perfect and pure, and they present the cure for all kinds of spiritual and physical problems in mankind.

Towards the end, Huzoorra said that man-made principles seek authentication from Islam; however, there are some circles amongst the Muslims who try to ‘justify’ the Islamic teachings in light of the worldly principles and, under the Western influence, attempt to mould the Islamic teachings according to the western principles. However, Huzoorra said, it is an apologetic mindset and equivalent to accepting the weakness of Islam [God forbid]. (Al Fazl, 8 October 1950, pp. 4 and 7)

The Lawrence Journal-World reported on this press conference and wrote that Hazrat “Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmood[ra], head of the [Ahmadiyya] Muslim Community” declared that the ongoing aspirations for a united Muslim World were “not backed by the necessary spirit of sacrifice” from the contemporary Muslims.

The newspaper also wrote that “His community believes Jesus Christ was taken down from the cross by his disciples while alive and travelled to India, where he died in what is now Kashmir.” (Lawrence Journal-World, 6 November 1950, p. 4)

What does the Quran say about Israel and Palestine?

16
M Adam Ahmad, Al Hakam
photo1701302549 4 scaled
AmirHadi Manavi | Unsplash

God Almighty revealed the Holy Quran to Prophet Muhammadsa for the guidance of humanity. This Holy Book of Allah the Almighty foretells many future events to strengthen the faith of the believers and enlighten those who seek understanding and truth. One such Divine revelation concerns the fate of Palestine. Allah the Exalted states:

وَلَقَدۡ کَتَبۡنَا فِي الزَّبُوۡرِ مِنۡۢ بَعۡدِ الذِّکۡرِ اَنَّ الۡاَرۡضَ يَرِثُہَا عِبَادِيَ الصّٰلِحُوۡنَ۔ اِنَّ فِيۡ ہٰذَا لَبَلٰغًا لِّقَوۡمٍ عٰبِدِيۡنَ۔ وَمَاۤ اَرۡسَلۡنٰکَ اِلَّا رَحۡمَةً لِّلۡعٰلَمِيۡنَ۔

“We have recorded in the Book of David, after the exhortation, that My righteous servants shall inherit the Land. Herein, surely, is a message for those who are devoted to worship. We have sent thee only as a mercy for the universe.” (Surah al-Anbiya’, Ch.21: V.106-108)

In Tafsir-e-Kabir, Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IIra have discussed the above verses at length.

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra explains that Allah the Almighty says in these verses that after some exhortations in the book of Psalms, He declared that the inheritors of the Holy Land will be His righteous servants. Herein, there is a message for people who truly worship Him. And God has sent the Holy Prophetsa as a mercy for all.

The aforementioned prophecy of the Bible states, “The righteous will inherit the land and dwell in it forever.” (Psalms, 37:29) However, one should not be misguided by the [temporary] dominance of the Israelites on the Holy Land, i.e., Palestine, because this prophecy also signifies that if the opportunity presents itself, the righteous servants of God will again prevail over this country.

Hence, God conveyed this message to the Muslims that a time will come when the Israelites will occupy the Holy Land.  The word ‘abidin [people who worship Allah] is used here to refer to the prophecy of David[as] in the book of Psalms. God forewarned the Muslims to be watchful that if at any time they show weakness in becoming His servants, Allah the Almighty will bring the Israelites back to Palestine. However, if the Muslims become true worshippers of God again, they will prevail anew.

Moreover, they should also realise that the mercy of the Holy Prophetsa is timeless and the era of Prophet Muhammadsa does not end with the triumph of the Israelites over Palestine. In fact, the mercy of Allah’s Messengersa transcends all ages, i.e., the periods before and after the occupation of the Israelites.

Thus, one should not be dismayed, as when divine mercy showers again, the Muslims will triumph once more in Palestine. (Tafsir-e-Kabir [2023], Vol. 8, pp. 105-106)

Explaining this prophecy of the Holy Quran, the Promised Messiah and Mahdi, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas says:

“It is clear from this verse that al-Ard, which refers to the land of [Greater] Syria, will always be inherited by the righteous people, and as of now, it is in the possession of Muslims.

“Allah the Almighty has not used the word “يَمْلِکھَا” [in the aforementioned verse] but in fact said “يَرِثُھَا”. This manifestly shows that the true heirs [of Palestine] will always be Muslims, and if it goes into the hands of some else at some point, such a possession would be similar to a scenario in which the mortgagor gives temporary control of their property to the mortgagee. This is the glory of Divine revelation, [and it shall surely come to pass].” (Al Hakam, 10 November 1902, p. 7)

Based on the divinely inspired commentaries of Hazrat Musleh-e-MaudraThe Five Volume Commentary of the Holy Quran also presents an overview of the prophecy under discussion. In the explanation of the verse 106 of Surah al-Anbiya‘, it states:

“By الارض (the land) is meant Palestine. It is worthy of note that Christian commentators themselves have interpreted the phrase ‘inherit the land’ or ‘inherit the earth’ in the Psalms as meaning, ‘inherit Canaan, the pledge of God’s covenant.’ (Commentary on the Old Testament, published by The Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, London, notes on Ps. 37:‌3, 9) The reference in the words, ‘in the Book of David’ is to Psalms 37:‌9, 11, 18, 22 & 29, where it is stated: 

“‘For evildoers shall be cut off; but those that wait upon the Lord, they shall inherit the earth. But the meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace. The Lord knoweth the days of the upright; and their inheritance shall be forever. […] For such as be blessed of him shall inherit the earth; and they that be cursed of him shall be cut; The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein forever.’

“The word الذکر may also refer to Torah, the Book of Moses. There is a prophecy in Deuteronomy (28:‌11 & 34:‌4) that Palestine was to be given to the Israelites: 

“‘For when I shall have brought them into the land which I swore unto their fathers, that floweth with milk and honey; and they shall have eaten and filled themselves, and waxen fat; then will they turn unto other gods, and serve them, and provoke me, and break my covenant […]. And the Lord said unto him, this is the land which I swore unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, saying, I will give it unto thy seed.’

“The Israelites rose to great power after Moses[as] and in the time of David[as] and Solomon[as] their rule extended far and wide till it embraced in its orbit far-off lands. Then they fell on evil days. They sinned and transgressed and killed God’s Prophets with the result that Divine nemesis overtook them. First Samaria was conquered and ravaged by the Assyrians about 733 BC and the whole country north of Israel was annexed by them. Then under Pharaoh Necho, the Egyptians ravaged Judah in 608 BC and last of all the greatest blow fell on Israel when Nebuchadnezzar, the Babylonian king, laid waste Judah, killed in cold blood the inhabitants of Jerusalem and burned and razed the holy Temple of Solomon to the ground and carried away in captivity the members of the royal family and their Prophets. After wandering in wilderness for about a century the Israelites were restored to Jerusalem and to some of their lost glory through the instrumentality of Cyrus, the Persian king and his successors. To this restoration the following passage of the Bible makes a prophetic reference from the mouth of Moses: 

“‘And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee – thou shalt return unto the Lord thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul; that then the Lord thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the Lord thy God hath scattered thee […]. And the Lord thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and He will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers.’ (Deuteronomy, 30:‌1-5)

“Again, the Israelites relapsed into sin and iniquity. They opposed and persecuted God’s Messengers and the cup of their wickedness became full to the brim when they hung on the cross Jesus[as], their last great Prophet. Then God’s wrath fell upon them. The Roman hordes under Titus attacked them in 70 AD and amid circumstances of unparalleled horror Jerusalem was destroyed and the Temple of Solomon was burnt down for the second time (Encyclopedia Biblica & Jewish Encyclopedia under ‘Jerusalem’). To this double disaster of the Israelites verses 17:5-8 of the Quran make a pointed reference. 

“Palestine, the Holy Land, remained in the hands of Christians till Muslims conquered it in the Caliphate of ‘Umar[ra], the Second Successor of the Holy Prophet[sa], and unlike Nebuchadnezzar and Titus he accorded such benign and kind treatment to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and showed such respect and reverence to the Temple of Solomon as are unparalleled in the whole annals of foreign conquest.

“It is to this conquest of Palestine by Muslim arms that the prophecy embodied in the verse under comment particularly refers. Palestine remained under Muslim possession for about 1350 years with the exception of a brief space of 92 years when during the Crusades it changed hands, till in our own time through the evil designs of some so-called democratic Christian powers, the country of the name of Palestine has altogether ceased to exist and on its ruins the State of Israel has been built. The Jews have come to their own after wandering in wilderness for about 2000 years. But this great historical event, too, has taken place in fulfilment of a Quranic prophecy. The Muslims were told that in the time of the Promised Messiah[as], the Jews will be made to come back to their Holy Land from the ends of the earth (17:105). But this is only a temporary phase. The Muslims are destined to win it back. Let the whole world know that sooner or later – sooner rather than later – Palestine will revert to Muslim possession. This is a Divine decree and nobody can alter God’s decree.” (The Five Volume Commentary, Vol. 4, pp. 2122-24)

In Tafsir-e-Kabir, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra explained that through Prophet Mosesas, Israelites were informed of two catastrophes and also told that their possession of Palestine would not be permanent. Rather, they would occupy it at first and then be expelled. After some time, they will occupy it once more and yet again lose dominion over it. These divine words of Allah the Almighty were fulfilled with sheer glory and greatness. Its details can be studied in Surah Bani Isra‘il, where Allah the Almighty says:

وَقَضَيۡنَاۤ اِلٰي بَنِيۡۤ اِسۡرَآءِيۡلَ فِي الۡکِتٰبِ لَتُفۡسِدُنَّ فِي الۡاَرۡضِ مَرَّتَيۡنِ وَلَتَعۡلُنَّ عُلُوًّا کَبِيۡرًا۔ فَاِذَا جَآءَ وَعۡدُ اُوۡلٰٮہُمَا بَعَثۡنَا عَلَيۡکُمۡ عِبَادًا لَّنَاۤ اُولِيۡ بَاۡسٍ شَدِيۡدٍ فَجَاسُوۡا خِلٰلَ الدِّيَارِ ؕ وَکَانَ وَعۡدًا مَّفۡعُوۡلًا۔ ثُمَّ رَدَدۡنَا لَکُمُ الۡکَرَّةَ عَلَيۡہِمۡ وَاَمۡدَدۡنٰکُمۡ بِاَمۡوَالٍ وَّبَنِيۡنَ وَجَعَلۡنٰکُمۡ اَکۡثَرَ نَفِيۡرًا۔

In other words, God Almighty had revealed to the Israelites in the Bible that they would certainly cause strife in this country [of Palestine] twice. And surely, they would gravely transgress. Thus, when the time came for the fulfilment of the first of these two atrocities, God gave strength to His servants against them. They were fierce warriors who entered their houses and this divine warning was bound to be fulfilled. Then, God restored the power of the Israelites against their enemy. And Allah the Almighty aided the Israelites with wealth and children and also made them stronger in number than ever before. (Surah Bani Isra‘il, Ch.17: V.5-7)

In the coming verses 8-9 of Surah Bani Isra‘il, God Almighty says:

فَاِذَا جَآءَ وَعۡدُ الۡاٰخِرَةِ لِيَسُوۡٓءٗا وُجُوۡہَکُمۡ وَلِيَدۡخُلُوا الۡمَسۡجِدَ کَمَا دَخَلُوۡہُ اَوَّلَ مَرَّةٍ وَّلِيُتَبِّرُوۡا مَا عَلَوۡا تَتۡبِيۡرًا۔ عَسٰي رَبُّکُمۡ اَنۡ يَّرۡحَمَکُمۡ ۚ وَاِنۡ عُدۡتُّمۡ عُدۡنَا ۘ وَجَعَلۡنَا جَہَنَّمَ لِلۡکٰفِرِيۡنَ حَصِيۡرًا۔

“So when the time for the latter warning came, We raised a people against you to cover your faces with grief, and to enter the mosque as they entered it the first time, and to destroy all that they conquered with utter destruction. It may be that your Lord will now have mercy on you; but if you return to your previous state, We too will return, and We have made Hell a prison for the disbelievers.”

It is evident from the above verses that the land of Palestine was promised to the righteous servants of Allah the Almighty. Since this promise was made first to the Jews, they reigned over it. However, while bestowing this land to them, God Almighty also imposed some conditions and said that after some time, He will take away this land from them because of their transgressions. (Tafsir-e-Kabir [2023], Vol. 8, pp. 107-108)

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra also clarified that some people mistakenly believe the triumph of Jews over Palestine as the end of Islam. Their viewpoint asserts Muslims’ loss of Palestine as proof that they are no longer regarded as ‘righteous servants.’ However, if the momentary occupations by the Babylonians and Romans during the time of Mosesas and Davidas are not considered to have abrogated their respective laws, it is irrational to term Muslims’ loss as a sign of Islam’s abrogation.

Thus, the temporary loss of Palestine by Muslims is consistent with the prophecy of the Holy Quran, where the return of the Israelites is not indicative of Islam’s abrogation but rather substantiates its truthfulness. The concept of ‘temporarily’ losing the land of Palestine clearly aligns with the Quranic promise asserting that ‘righteous servants’ will inherit the land, and it clearly means that, despite all the efforts of the global powers, the decree of Allah the Almighty will prevail, ensuring the eventual return of Muslims to Palestine and the establishment of their rule. (Ibid., p. 113)