Home Blog Page 127

Friday Sermon – Muhammad (sa): The Great Exemplar (29 December 2023)

0

Friday Sermon

29 December 2023

Muhammadsa: The Great Exemplar

Mubarak Mosque

After reciting the tashahudta‘awuz and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

Today, I will continue to present further details regarding the Battle of Uhud. As mentioned previously, because the mountain pass was vacated, the disbelievers launched an attack from behind and overturned the outcome of the war. The enemy’s attack was extremely dangerous. What was the state of the resolve, courage and valour of the Holy Prophetsa at that moment? The details of this have been recorded as follows; when the outcome of the battle flipped, the Companions were unable to regroup owing to a state of confusion, panic and dismay. But even during this state of panic and dismay and despite being surrounded by the enemy from all sides, the Holy Prophetsa remained steadfast and firmly stood his ground. Seeing the Companions scatter in all directions in a state of panic, the Holy Prophetsa would continuously say: “O such and such! Come towards me, O such and such, come towards me. I am the Messenger of Allah!” All the while he was being showered with arrows from every direction.

In one narration, it is related that the Holy Prophetsa proclaimed loudly:

اَنَا النَّبِيُّ لَا کَذِبِ

اَنَا ابْنُ عَبْدِ الْمُطَّلِب

اَنَا ابْنُ الْعَوَاتِکْ

“I am the Prophet this is not a lie. I am the son of ‘Abdul Muttalib. I am the son of ‘Awatik.” In books of traditions and biographies, it is generally stated that the Holy Prophetsa said these words during the Battle of Hunayn. However, it is possible that he uttered these same words during [the Battle of] Uhud as well as Hunayn. (Sirah al-Halabiyyah, Vol. 2, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, p. 310)

The word “Awatik” has been mentioned here. “Awatik” is the plural of “Atikah” and there was more than one woman by the name of ‘Atikah among the ancestors, that is the maternal and paternal grandmothers of the Holy Prophetsa. Firstly, there was Atikah bint Hilal, the mother of ‘Abd Manaf. Secondly, there was Atikah bint Murrah, the mother of Hashim bin ‘Abd Manaf. Thirdly, there was Atikah bint Auqis, the mother of Wahab, i.e., the mother of Hazrat Aminah’s father.

According to one narration, there were nine women; three of them were from Banu Sulaim and the others belonged to other tribes and all of them were from the ancestors of the Holy Prophetsa. (Lughat al-Hadith, Vol. 3, p. 97, Nu’mani Kutub Khana, Lahore)

Detailing this incident, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra has written in The Lifeand Character of the Seal of Prophetssa:

“When the Companions of ‘Abdullah bin Jubairra saw that victory had been secured, they said to their Amīr, Abdullah, ‘Now victory has been secured and the Muslims are collecting spoils of war. Permit us to join the army as well.’ Abdullahra restrained them and reminded them of the strict order of the Holy Prophetsa, but they were becoming heedless in the joy of victory and therefore did not abstain, and left their positions, saying, ‘All that the Holy Prophetsa inferred was that the mountain pass should not be left empty until security fully prevailed, and now that victory has been clinched, there is nothing wrong with proceeding forward.’

“Hence, except for ‘Abdullah bin Jubairra and five or seven Companions, there remained no one to secure the mountain pass. When the sharp eye of Khalid bin Walid caught sight of the mountain pass from afar, he found it to be an empty field, upon which he quickly gathered his riders and immediately proceeded towards it. Behind him, Ikramah bin Abu Jahl also followed suit with whatever was left of the detachment, and quickly reached there. Both of these detachments instantly martyred ‘Abdullah bin Jubairra and the few Companions who stood by his side and suddenly attacked the Muslim army from the rear. Assured of their victory, the Muslims, who were unmindful and dispersed, became flustered by this sudden misfortune. Yet, despite this, they managed to regain themselves and attempted to fend off this attack by the disbelievers. At this instance, a cunning enemy called out, ‘O Ye Muslims! The disbelievers have launched an attack from the opposing front as well!’ (That is, an attack has been launched from there as well). Taken aback, the Muslims turned upon their heels again, and in a state of confusion, without thinking, they began to swing their swords at their own men.

“On the other side, when Amrah bint Alqamah, a brave woman from Mecca, witnessed this sight, she immediately moved forward, and took hold of the Quraish flag, which had until now been laying in the dust, and raised it into the air. Upon witnessing this, the dismembered army of the Quraish once again regrouped, and in this manner, the Muslims became completely surrounded by the enemy from all four sides. An awful state of panic erupted within the Muslim army.” This much has already been mentioned in the previous sermon; how they regrouped, how the attack was launched and who bore the flag. Nevertheless, he further states:

“The Holy Prophetsa who was witnessing this entire sight from an elevated location called out to the Muslims again and again, but his voice would drown in the noise and commotion. Historians write that all this transpired in such a short period of time, that most of the Muslims even began to attack each other, and no distinction remained between friend and foe. As such, certain Muslims were wounded at the hands of other Muslims, and (as was mentioned in the previous sermon) Yamanra, the father of Hudhaifahra, was even martyred accidentally by the Muslims. At the time, Hudhaifahra was present nearby. He continued to exclaim, ‘O Ye Muslims! This is my father,’ but at the time, who would pay heed? Afterwards, the Holy Prophetsa desired to pay the blood money for Yamanra on behalf of the Muslims, but Hudhaifahra refused to accept and said, ‘I forgive the Muslims for the blood of my father.’” (Life and Character of the Seal of Prophets, Vol. 2, pp. 332-334)

Whilst narrating this incident, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra states:

“It was a dark and dangerous moment when the Holy Prophetsa was injured, and such incidents transpired whereby the success of the Muslim army turned into a defeat. During this battle, there was a mountain pass where the Holy Prophetsa appointed and posted some of his Companions. He instructed them to not leave this mountain pass, no matter the outcome of the battle. When the army of the disbelievers scattered and fled, these Companions mistakenly judged that there was no more benefit in remaining there, and that they should also go and take part in the fighting. Their commander told them that the Holy Prophetsa strictly instructed them not to leave the mountain pass, however, they replied, ‘The Holy Prophetsa did not mean that we should remain there even when the battle is won. The meaning of his instruction was to remain here only as long as the battle was ongoing. But now that we are victorious and the enemy is fleeing, we should also try to attain some blessings of the fighting.’ Hence, the mountain pass was left unattended.

“Hazrat Khalid bin Walid, who at the time had not yet become a Muslim, was a young man with a very sharp eye. When he saw his army fleeing, he glanced back and found the mountain pass was empty. Seeing this, he turned back and attacked the Muslims from behind. As this attack was completely unexpected for the Muslims, they went into a state of complete shock, and as a result of being scattered, they were unable to successfully face the enemy.” (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 9, pp. 76-77)

Whilst mentioning this incident in the commentary of Surah an-Nur, verse 64, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra states:

“So let those who go against His command beware, lest a trial afflict them or a grievous punishment overtake them.” This is the translation of the verse. He then continues, “Therefore, observe how much harm was inflicted on the Muslim army because a command of the Holy Prophetsa was disobeyed during the Battle of Uhud, The Holy Prophetsa had appointed 50 people to guard a mountain pass. This mountain pass was so important that he called their commander Abdullah bin Jubair Ansari and said, ‘Whether we are killed or are victorious, you must not leave this mountain pass.’ However, when the disbelievers were defeated and the Muslims were pursuing them, the soldiers assigned to guard the mountain pass said to their commander, ‘We are now victorious. It is useless for us to remain here, so permit us to attain the blessings of taking part in the Jihad.’ Their commander explained to them, ‘Do not go against the command of the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa said that we are not to leave this mountain pass, whether we are victorious or defeated. I therefore cannot permit you to go.’ “They replied, ‘It was not the intention of the Holy Prophetsa that we should not move once the victory was attained. He only said this to emphasise the point. But now that the victory is at hand, we have no duty left here.’ They therefore gave precedence to their opinion over the command of the Messenger of Allahsa, and left the mountain pass. Only their commander and a few soldiers remained.

“When the army of the disbelievers were fleeing, Khalid bin Walid happened to look back and found the mountain pass to be unguarded. He called out to Amr bin al-Aas – the two of them had not yet accepted Islam – and said, ‘Look, this is the perfect opportunity. Come, let us turn back and attack the Muslim army.’ Hence, the two generals gathered their fleeing army and cutting through a flank of the Muslim army they climbed the mountain. The few Muslims that were left were no match for them and the enemies tore them to pieces. They then attacked the Muslim army from the rear. This attack by the enemy was so sudden that the Muslims, who were dispersed and relishing their victory, could not re-organise themselves. Only a few companions gathered around the Holy Prophetsa, who did not number more than 20. But for how long could they hold off the enemy? Eventually, owing to a unit of the disbelievers, the Muslim fighters were pushed back and the Holy Prophetsa was left isolated on the battlefield. In these circumstances, a stone hit the Holy Prophet’ssa helmet, which caused its rings to become lodged in his head, resulting in him falling unconscious into a ditch. Some evil individuals had dug up a ditch and covered it to cause harm to the Muslims. After this, a few other companions were martyred and their bodies fell upon the blessed body of the Holy Prophetsa. It was spread amongst the people that the Holy Prophetsa was martyred. However, the Companions that were pushed back by the attack of the disbelievers, once again gathered around the Holy Prophetsa when the disbelievers moved back. They pulled the Holy Prophetsa out of the ditch. After a short while, the Holy Prophetsa regained consciousness. He sent men to all four sides of the battlefield in order to assemble the Muslim army. He then took his Companions and gathered at the foot of the mountain.

“After gaining the upper hand, the Muslim army suffered a temporary loss, because a few people disobeyed an order of the Holy Prophetsa. Instead of acting according to the guidance of the Holy Prophetsa, they relied on their own inferences. If only they followed the command of the Holy Prophetsa like a pulse follows a heartbeat. Had they thought that the result of following the command of the Holy Prophetsa meant that every person would have to sacrifice their lives, they would consider that to be of no significance; owing to their own interpretation, had they not abandoned the mountain pass that the Holy Prophetsa strictly commanded not to leave, irrespective of whether they were victorious or defeated, then the enemy would not have had the opportunity to attack again and the Holy Prophetsa and the Companions would not have had to endure difficulty.” (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 6, pp. 410-411)

Allah the Almighty said that they suffered the consequences of disobedience and this was the result of it.

Then, in another place, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has mentioned an exceptional commentary of Surah al-Kauthar. It is quite a detailed commentary in which he makes reference to this incident. He writes:

“During the Battle of Uhud, God Almighty gave the Muslims victory, after which the disbelievers ran away. Khalid bin Walid and Amr bin al-Aas, two extraordinary generals of Islam, had not yet accepted Islam and fought on the side of the disbelievers. The Holy Prophetsa appointed some Companions at the mountain pass and ordered them strictly not to move from that place, irrespective of whether they were victorious or were defeated; whether they remained alive or were killed, they were not to move from that spot. The Muslims, in those times and even today, have a passion for Jihad. When the Muslims gained victory, the people who were assigned to guard the mountain pass said to their leader: ‘Please permit us to fight in whatever Jihad is left. Islam is victorious and now there is no danger left.’ He replied: ‘The Holy Prophetsa commanded us, whether we are victorious or defeated, whether they live or are killed, we must not move from here. Therefore we must remain here.’ They said: ‘The Holy Prophetsa did not mean that even after victory we must remain here and not leave. He appointed us here as a precaution. The enemy has now run away, and Islam is victorious. Now there is no harm in us leaving this place and taking part in the Jihad that remains.’ Their leader said (and he said with great wisdom): ‘When a leader issues a directive, the subordinate does not have the right to make inferences based on their own intellect. The Holy Prophetsa instructed us not to leave from here, whether they win or lose, whether they live or are killed. He emphasised that we must not leave from here. Therefore, in accordance with his command, we must remain here.’ However, they insisted on their erroneous view and did not accept what he said. They said to their leader: ‘You can stay here if you wish. We are going.’ Hence, most of them left, leaving behind the leader and a few people with him.

“The army of the disbelievers was running away. Khalid bin Walid was extremely intelligent and always vigilant. He achieved extraordinary feats after accepting Islam and even for the disbelievers, he was an exceptional general. While he was running away with his army, he glanced over at the mountain pass and saw that it was vacant. Amr bin al-Aas was with him and he said to Amr; ‘This is an excellent opportunity’. Amr also looked back and turned his contingent around. Khalid bin Walid went around from one side and attacked the mountain pass, whereas Amr bin al-Aas attacked from the other. Slaying the Muslims on the mountain pass, they attacked the Muslim army from the rear. The Muslims considered themselves protected from the side of the mountain pass. They had become scattered and were no longer arranged in their rows. They were pursuing the remnants of the enemy army when, all of a sudden, Khalid bin Walid and Amr bin al-Aas attacked from the rear, which led to individual Muslims confronting entire contingents. Some Muslims were martyred, some were injured and those that remained lost their footing. Especially when the enemy continued the attack and reached the Holy Prophetsa, only 12 Companions were with the Holy Prophetsa. Both these generals, i.e., Khalid bin Walid and Amr bin al-Aas, called out to their other commanders to launch an attack. Thus, an army of 3,000 attacked in the form of a mob. At the time, the enemies were hurling stones, shooting arrows and swords were clashing, all the while there was a state of panic and confusion among the Muslim army. Given the circumstances, the Companions offered unparalleled sacrifices, but they could not withstand an attack of a reinvigorated army of 3,000 men. In this attack, the Holy Prophetsa lost two of his teeth, a rock hit his helmet and a ring became lodged in his head as a result of which he fell unconscious into a pit. The bodies of the Companions near the Holy Prophetsa fell on top of him and his blessed body became hidden underneath. There was an uproar among the Muslims that the Holy Prophetsa had been martyred. The Muslims were already in a state of panic, but hearing this news they lost all their remaining composure. However, it was the wisdom of Allah the Almighty that, when it became known amongst the disbelievers that the Holy Prophetsa had been martyred, they did not attack further. Rather, they deemed it best to immediately set out for Mecca and inform them of the good news that the Holy Prophetsa had been killed – God forbid.” (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 10, pp. 340-341, Surah al-Kauthar, Verse 2)

With regard to the bravery and steadfastness of the Holy Prophetsa, there is a narration by Miqdad bin Amr regarding the Battle of Uhud. He states, “By Allah, the idolaters killed [the Muslims] and inflicted many wounds upon the Holy Prophetsa. Let it be known, I swear by Him, Who has sent the Holy Prophetsa with the truth, the Holy Prophetsa did not move an inch and stood steadfast against the enemy. A party of his Companions would come towards the Holy Prophetsa but due to the onslaught from the enemy, they would become separated from him. (In other words, when the disbelievers would attack, the Companions would become dispersed and then regroup). The Holy Prophetsa would stand and continue to fire arrows with his bow and throw stones, until the idolaters would be forced back and he remained steadfast along with a group of his Companions.”

According to another narration, it is mentioned that the Holy Prophetsa remained resolute in his position and did not retreat even a single step. In fact, he continued to fight against the enemy and fired arrows at them with his bow, to the point that the bowstring snapped and the piece he was holding was no bigger than his hand. (i.e., the bowstring with which the arrows are fired snapped). Ukasha bin Mihsanra took the bow from the Holy Prophetsa in order to fix the bowstring but was unable to do so and stated, “O Messengersa of Allah! The bowstring is not long enough.” The Holy Prophetsa instructed him to pull the bowstring and it would reach the end. Ukashara narrates, “I swear by Him Who has sent him with the truth, when I pulled the bowstring it reached the other end and I wrapped it around the arc of the bow two or three times.” It was not long enough to reach the end, however perhaps miraculously it became long enough. Thereafter, the Holy Prophetsa took hold of his bow and continued to fire arrows and Abu Talhahra stood over the Holy Prophetsa and shielded him. The Holy Prophet’ssa bow then broke into pieces and he also ran out of arrows. Qutadah bin Nu’man took the bow and it always remained in his possession. The Holy Prophetsa then began to throw stones instead.

Nafi bin Jubair relates that he heard one of the Muhajirin say, “I took part in [the battle of] Uhud, and I witnessed arrows were being fired from all directions and the Holy Prophetsa was right in the middle of them. All of the arrows would fall away from the Holy Prophetsa. On that day, I saw Abdullah bin Shihab Zuhri and he was saying, ‘Show me where Muhammad is, for if he survives then I shall not survive.’ The Holy Prophetsa was right beside him at the time and there was nobody with the Holy Prophetsa at the time. When he went on ahead, Safwan bin Umayyah rebuked him upon which he stated, ‘By Allah, I did not see him.’ (Allah the Almighty was protecting the Holy Prophetsa in this manner). By Allah, he was kept protected from us. By Allah, there were four of us who left Mecca and we had vowed with one another to kill him [the Holy Prophetsa]. However, we were unable to reach him.”

Ibn Sa’d states that Abu Nimar Kinani stated, “I participated in the Battle of Uhud along with the idolaters and I had set five targets and would fire my arrows at them. I saw that the Holy Prophetsa was surrounded by his Companions and the arrows were falling to his left and right and some of them would land before him or go over him. Later, Allah the Almighty guided me towards Islam.” He later became a Muslim. (Taken from Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad, Vol. 4, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, pp. 196-197)

In relation to this the Promised Messiahas states:

“The life of the Holy Prophetsa in Mecca is an extraordinary example. (The Promised Messiahas was mentioning this with reference to the bravery of the Holy Prophetsa). In one aspect, he had to endure hardship all his life. During the Battle of Uhud, the Holy Prophetsa stood on his own. During the battle, for the Holy Prophetsa to proclaim that he was the Messenger of Allah at such a time demonstrated his magnificence, courage and steadfastness.” (Malfuzat [1984], Vol. 2, p. 309)

Even whilst standing amidst the enemy, the Holy Prophetsa did not conceal his identity, in fact, he announced it to let everyone know.

The Promised Messiahas further states:

“The hardships which the prophets and saints experience are not like the curses and humiliation that has befallen the Jews which is owing to the chastisement and displeasure of Allah the Almighty. In fact, the prophets demonstrate a great model of courage. God Almighty did not have any enmity for Islam but ponder how the Holy Prophetsa was left all alone in the Battle of Uhud. The hidden wisdom behind this was so that the bravery of the Holy Prophetsa could be witnessed. The Holy Prophetsa stood all alone amidst an army of 10,000 and announced that he was the Messenger of Allah. No other prophet had the opportunity to demonstrate such an example.” (Malfuzat [2022], Vol. 2, pp. 172-173)

In the Battle of Uhud, there was an army of 3,000, but because this has been written in a newspaper, it is possible the Promised Messiahas made combined reference to two battles. In the Battle of Ahzab [Confederates], the disbelievers totalled 10,000 and in other battles, the enemies were in great numbers. Nonetheless, the main aspect that the Promised Messiahas is highlighting is the bravery and example of the Holy Prophetsa that even in front of the disbelievers he stood there alone. No other prophet had the opportunity to demonstrate this example.

The Promised Messiahas further states: 

“God Almighty is All-Powerful and can bestow strength to anything He wills. Thus, the ability to witness Him is manifested through His speech. It is owing to this very Divine discourse that the Prophets laid their lives before Him. Can one whose love is superficial do such a thing? No Prophet who has entered this field owing to this Divine discourse, then retreated from it or showed disloyalty. (In other words, when they have made their claim, they have remained firm upon it). People have offered many interpretations with regard to the incident in the Battle of Uhud. However, the fact of the matter is that this was the manifestation of God’s greatness and glory and apart from the Holy Prophetsa no one else had the power to withstand this. The Holy Prophetsa remained resolute whilst the other companions lost their footing. Just as the Holy Prophetsa was matchless in his sincerity and loyalty towards God, likewise one cannot find such an example of Divine support as was granted to the Holy Prophetsa.” (Malfuzat [2022], Vol. 5, p. 268)

I will, insha-Allah, continue to narrate further details in the future.

I would like to recount the good qualities of a servant of the Jamaat, one of our long-serving missionaries, Dr. Jalal Shams. I led his funeral prayer yesterday, but I would also like to mention a few things about him in the Friday Sermon as well. He was a very capable, intelligent, simple and loyal life-devotee. He recently passed away at the age of 79:

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّاۤ اِلَيۡہِ رٰجِعُوۡنَ

[[Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.]

He graduated from Jamia Ahmadiyya with a Shahid degree in 1969 with very good marks. He initially served in various places in Pakistan and then upon the instruction of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh, he was sent to Islamabad, Pakistan to learn the Turkish language. Then, in order to pursue further studies in the Turkish language, he was sent to Turkey in 1974, where he obtained a PhD in the Turkish language with very good marks. He later moved to the UK upon the instruction of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh. He had the opportunity to serve as a missionary here in the UK and Germany. Many people have written about him from Turkey, Germany and the UK. He had a very wide circle of acquaintances and many people knew him. He was later also appointed as the In-charge of the Turkish Desk here in the UK and he continued to serve in this post right till his last breath with the utmost sincerity and dedication. Allah the Almighty had bestowed him with a great level of intelligence, aptitude and acumen. When he obtained his degree in Turkish, the University in Istanbul offered him a job as a professor. It was a very good job and they also offered a substantial amount in salary as well. Upon this, he sought guidance from Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh and Huzoorrh did not instruct him whether he should or should not go ahead with it but told him to instead pray and after deliberating on the matter, he should make a decision and see what he wants to do. And so, he prayed to Allah the Almighty and gave precedence to his life devotion and subsequently rejected the job offer. In 2002, while on an official visit to Turkey, he was arrested along with two other members for carrying out tabligh there. He had the honour of being imprisoned in the way of Allah for four and a half months. 

Among his notable achievements was translating the Holy Quran into Turkish alongside his colleagues. Apart from this, he translated dozens of the Promised Messiah’sas books and authored and translated many pamphlets, tracts and books into Turkish used for moral training and propagation. He was an academic and a scholar who was passionate about reading. He studied the books of the Promised Messiahas and the Caliphs in great depth. He would take notes on the books. Aside from the books of the Jamaat, he enjoyed reading books on other disciplines. He was perceptive and sagacious, and during his academic conversations with his friends and colleagues, he spoke very profoundly.

When he was faced with a difficulty or did not understand something, he did not allow arrogance to overcome him and even consulted with junior missionaries for assistance. He had the  God-given gift and skill of learning languages. Besides his native languages of Urdu and Punjabi, he acquired a PhD in Turkish and gained extraordinary expertise in the language. He was also able to speak English, Arabic, German, and Persian. In fact, on some occasions, when there was no one else available who was acquainted with the language, he would translate the proceedings of gatherings with Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh into Arabic. He could also speak Saraiki.

Early on, he would also do the live translation of the Friday sermon; rather, it was not a live translation, but instead he would translate the sermon immediately after it was delivered. Those who know Turkish well praised his standard and level of vocabulary. He was also very skilled in public speaking and writing. Nonetheless, he possessed many excellent qualities. He fulfilled the rights of Allah alongside the rights of mankind to a high standard. Whether one was related to him or not, he treated everyone with love and many people have written to me in this regard. He was sympathetic and sociable. His meetings with others would leave lasting impressions on them. He had full faith and trust in Allah. He discretely helped the poor and those in need. He had a profound love for Khilafat. He saw true dreams and visions. He remained occupied in the remembrance of God. May Allah the Almighty elevate his station. May He grant his wife and children patience and fortitude, and enable them to carry on his virtues.

There are three other deceased members whose funeral prayers in absentia I will lead. The first among them is Muhammad Ibrahim Bhambri Sahib. He passed away a few days ago at the age of 106 years.

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّاۤ اِلَيۡہِ رٰجِعُوۡنَ

[Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.]

According to some records, his age was 106, while others put his age at 109. Nonetheless, he was at least 106 years old. By the grace of Allah the Almighty, he was a musi. Ahmadiyyat entered his family through his father, Chaudhry Abdul Karim Sahib, who pledged allegiance in 1918 or 1919.

Whilst mentioning his father’s pledge of allegiance, Ibrahim Bhambri sahib writes, “By the grace of Allah the Almighty, my family entered the fold of Ahmadiyyat through my father. Prior to that, my father belonged to the Ahl-e-Hadith sect. In 1918, his vision became very weak as he developed cataract. For his treatment, he went to the Noor Hospital in Qadian. Because my father was well-known, people quickly heard that Chaudhry Abdul Karim was admitted to the hospital and many people came to visit him. Master Abdur Rahman, Mehar Singh, and other respectable figures also came to visit from time to time out of respect for Chaudhry Sahib. Those respectable visitors also began to preach to him.”

He further writes, “It became clear to my father that Jesusas has passed away. His heart had accepted that Jesusas is not alive and has, in fact, passed away. Thus, his heart accepted that the Promised Messiahas was truthful because Jesusas had passed away, and the advent of the Promised Messiah is the need of the time. This is the era for the advent of the Promised Messiah, if he did not come, then when would he appear? He pledged allegiance in Qadian whilst he was still unwell. When he returned to his village, Bhambri, the people learned that he had accepted Ahmadiyyat and came to meet him to express their regret. The people said, ‘O Mian Abdul Karim, if we had known you would become a “Mirzai” [Ahmadi] after travelling to Qadian, we would have allowed you to go blind as long as it prevented you from going to Qadian.’” His father would reply by saying, “My sense of sight has sharpened along with my spiritual eyesight.” He would also say, “Spiritual eyesight is more important that physical sight. I cannot thank Allah the Almighty enough for guiding me to the right path. I can openly testify that the Promised Messiahas is true.”

Nonetheless, there was a lot of malice in the hearts of the villagers towards the Promised Messiahas. The clerics had poisoned their minds to such a degree that they would say, “If you claim to be the Mahdi, we will accept you, but we will not accept Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.” Upon this, his father would say, “Observe, then, that the fact that I have accepted him – and rightfully so – is a sign of his truthfulness. Thus, you should also accept him.”

In 1926, Bhambri Sahib’s father enrolled Bhambri Sahib and his brother in Madrasa-e-Ahmadiyya in Qadian. They would travel five miles every day to come to study at school. His father passed away in 1931 and his brothers tried to convince his mother not to send the two brothers, Ibrahim Bahambri Sahib and his younger brother, to Qadian saying that they had to travel very far and they would instead enrol them into a school that was closer. However, their mother said, “I cannot do that. Their father enrolled them in Madrassah Ahmadiyya and now they will remain in Madrassah Ahmadiyya.” And so he said that they continued going to Qadian.

Then after completing his studies at the Madrasah in Qadian, he joined Jamia Ahmadiyya, as at that time it was possible to enrol in Jamia after the seventh grade. Then, in 1941, he privately completed his matriculation examination. In 1939, he passed the Maulvi Fazil exam. He had memorised the entire qaseedah by the Promised Messiahas; he had memorised many poems from Kalam-e-Mahmud and Durr-e-Thamin. He had also memorised many quotations and he was able to cite references instantly.

In 1939, after passing the Maulvi Fazil exam from Punjab University he dedicated his life. When he went to see the Second Caliphra he said, “Learn office work.” On 1 January 1944, he was appointed as a religious studies and Arabic teacher at Madrassah Ahmadiyya. From 1941 to 1947, he served the Community. For three years, from 1941 to 1944, he worked as Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad’sra personal secretary. He then also served in the Nazarat Baitul Maal, as Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra had advised him to learn office work.

Then, in 1947, he was appointed as a professor at Talimul Islam High School in Qadian and then, after the partition, he was able to serve in Talimul Islam High School Rabwah where he served until 1974. Then, in 1974, he retired from the school and from 1975 to 1994, he served in the Waqf-e-Jadid department as Inspector Waqf-e-Jadid Nazim Irshad. He also worked with Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh – Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmadrh and upon his instruction, he would visit various places in order to settle various matters. He undertook the responsibility of teaching mu’allimeen [local teachers]. He served as the local president of the Dar-un-Nasr neighbourhood for over fifty years. He was the Imamus Salat and he would also lead the Taraweeh prayers. He had memorised a large part of the Holy Quran.

One of his daughters says, “His treatment of relatives was exemplary. The children of any of our relatives who lived outside of Rabwah would stay at our home in order to obtain an education. The secret to his long, blessed and active life was waking up early in the morning for Fajr, being occupied in the remembrance of Allah, walking, riding his bicycle to and from school and his work. He had a very simple diet and he always remained content and patient. He had immense and true love for the Caliphs.”

She says, “All of us children were abroad. When we would tell him that he should also move abroad, he would say that he needed to visit and pray daily at the grave of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra and so he could not move abroad. He had a special love and attachment with Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra. Whenever someone came to him requesting for prayers he would first say that they should write a letter to the Caliph of the time and then he would raise his hands pray. Then he would raise his hands and pray for that person. Before sleeping, he would recite all the couplets of the qasidah “Ya Aina Faidillahi wa al-Irfani” by the Promised Messiahas. He would recite it in its entirety before sleeping.”

Then she writes, “My father often recalled a dream which his father (meaning his daughter’s grandfather) had seen; [the grandfather related] ‘Ibrahim was climbing on top of a date tree and I was worried that he might fall, but as I watch on, he reached the top of the tree’ and so my father interpreted that dream to mean his long life and increasing of knowledge.”

Sheikh Mubarak Ahmad, who is the Nazir Diwan, Pakistan, writes, “I was also his student, and I also taught alongside him at a school for five years, as a teacher. In boarding school, Bhambri Sahib worked as a tutor, and he worked there for a long time. Whether they were Ahmadi or non-Ahmadi, he would treat all the students of the boarding school with love and compassion. He would adopt a specific style of training in accordance with every student’s attitude and personality. The students would also get attached to him very quickly and would treat him with the same respect and dignity as they would their father. He would spend the majority of his time in the boarding school. He would lead the prayers. He would especially focus on the prayers of every student, and he was very loving and compassionate.” I was also his student and he was strict with me as well. In fact, when I became Nazir-e-A’la, I would remind him of his strictness, and he would laugh. But alongside [the discipline] he was also sympathetic and his intention was always to achieve reformation.

He honourably performed the responsibilities of being the local president, and he would often remark, “I know of all of the houses in which there is no male figure, or the women live alone. When the men of the house are travelling, I reach out to all those houses on my way to the market, so that if they have any task in the city, they can tell me.” He had a bag, a pen and a piece of paper; they would write down the things that they needed me to bring. Then he would also drop things off and deliver the groceries to each house. If there was someone who wrote a letter, he would post the letter at the post office. If letters arrived, then he would bring them from the post office, and deliver them to the relevant house. If someone asked him to read the letter out loud, because they could not read, he would also read the letter out loud for them. He was extremely trustworthy; he would not talk about the private matters of anyone with others. Since he was the local president of the area, some wives would present certain cases to him, and would mention the weaknesses of their husbands. So, without telling the husbands, he would search for a good moment, give advice [to the men], and explain the issue to them.

Thus, the people in the neighbourhood, whether they were men, women or children, would find him to be like a gracious father. This is the true manner in which office bearers should amicably live with others and should try to reform them. He would also advise missionaries that they should memorise poems as well, and that they should read the poetry of the Promised Messiahas as it contains advice. He himself would say “I read the qasidah every night, and then go to sleep.” Thus, this also serves as advice for missionaries.

In his life, one of his daughters was martyred as she came to Rabwah from a village, and he endured this grief with great patience and tranquillity. Then another daughter of his passed away in London, and at the time he was unwell. Her body was brought to Rabwah. At that time, he again endured this grief with a lot of patience, rather, he would himself instruct others to be patient.

Nonetheless, he lived a successful life in every way, and lived a long life, and would often say that the next abode is much better than this life. May Allah the Almighty elevate his status in heaven and enable his progeny to carry on his virtues.

The next funeral prayer that I will lead, is of Yusuf Jaray from Ghana. He passed away a few days ago.

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّاۤ اِلَيۡہِ رٰجِعُوۡنَ

[Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.]

The Amir and missionary-in-charge of Ghana writes that the deceased was a Musi and was a pious Ahmadi. He held different offices and was blessed with countless opportunities to serve the Jamaat. At the time of his passing, he was also serving as the chairman of two Ahmadi senior high school boards. He worked with the Talim Department. Prior to his retirement, he also served as headmaster of the Ahmadiyya senior high schools in Potsin and Kumasi.

Yusuf Sahib was also blessed to serve as the Sadr Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya Ghana and was also serving in this role during Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IV’srh tour of Ghana in 1988. He rendered great services in the Department of Security. The deceased had strong ties with the Talim Department and always strove to improve the education of the Ahmadi youth. One of his grandchildren is a missionary and is currently serving the Jamaat. May Allah the Almighty bestow Him with mercy and forgiveness.

The next mention is of Al-Hajj Uthman bin Adam of Ghana. He also passed away recently at the age of 81 years.

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّاۤ اِلَيۡہِ رٰجِعُوۡنَ

[Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.]

Regarding him, the Amir and missionary-in-charge writes: “He was a member of the institution of Wasiyyat and was a very pious Ahmadi. He was regular in his daily prayers, and in offering his financial contributions. He would go above and beyond in participating in Jamaat work, was truly devoted to Khilafat, and strived to inculcate this very same passion in his children. He would heavily focus on the religious and secular knowledge of his children. He also played a big role in the translation of the Holy Quran into the Fanti language.” He translated the Holy Quran into the Fanti language and played a big part in this.

His wife says that the deceased had a very patient disposition and was very loving. In 2012, by the grace of Allah, he had the opportunity to perform the Hajj. He taught many members of the Jamaat how to read the Holy Quran. May Allah the Almighty bestow His forgiveness and mercy upon him and enable his progeny to carry on his good deeds.

(Official Urdu published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 19 January 2024, pp. 2-7. Translated by The Review of Religions.)

Jalsa Salana 2023 held in Guinea-Bissau

0
Zahid Ahmad Bhatti, Missionary, Guinea-Bissau

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Guinea-Bissau held its 13th Jalsa Salana in the capital city of Bissau on 29-31 December 2023.

The inaugural day commenced with the tahajjud prayer, and the proceedings unfolded after the Fajr prayer with the dars of the Holy Quran, followed by a flag housing ceremony by the missionary-in-charge, Ahsan Memon Sahib and the Administrator of the area.

The formal programme began with the recitation from the Holy Quran and an Arabic qasidah of the Promised Messiahas.

The guests shared their thoughts and the missionary-in-charge delivered the opening speech, emphasising the significance and objectives of the Jalsa. The day concluded with Maghrib and Isha prayers, followed by a well-attended question and answer session.

The second day’s session commenced at 10 am with a recitation from the Holy Quran, followed by a poem and speeches delivered on various topics such as “Muhammadsa: The Messenger of Peace”, “The Coming of Messiah and the Mahdi”, and “World Crisis and the Pathway to Peace.”

The third session included speeches on “What is Ahmadiyya Islam?”, “Khilafat as the Source of Peace and Unity”, and “Achieving True Piety Through Financial Sacrifice.” Maghrib and Isha prayers followed, and the question and answer session from the previous day continued.

The closing session, broadcast live with the blessings of MTA, marked the conclusion of the Jalsa Salana.

The event garnered extensive media coverage, with national TV, a newspaper, and eight radio channels reporting on the Jalsa. The Jamaat’s message reached remote areas, prompting the people of a village to announce their intention to join the Jamaat, recognising it as true Islam.

The Jalsa witnessed the participation of over 4,500 people, including 175 government officials, representatives, administrators, police and security chiefs, and leaders of different areas. Notably, 642 individuals pledged their bai‘at and announced joining the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat.

Prayer for protection againt Satan

0

عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ـ رضى اللہ عنهما ـ قَالَ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى اللہ عليه وسلم: لَوْ أَنَّ أَحَدَهُمْ إِذَا أَرَادَ أَنْ يَأْتِيَ أَهْلَهُ قَالَ بِاسْمِ اللہ، الّٰلہُمَّ جَنِّبْنَا الشَّيْطَانَ، وَجَنِّبِ الشَّيْطَانَ مَا رَزَقْتَنَا، فَإِنَّهُ إِنْ يُقَدَّرْ بَيْنَهُمَا وَلَدٌ فِي ذَلِكَ، لَمْ يَضُرَّهُ شَيْطَانٌ أَبَدًا‏‏.‏

It is narrated by Hazrat Ibn ‘Abbasra that, “The Holy Prophetsa said, ‘When one of you intends to approach his spouse intimately, if he says: ‘Bismillah, Allahumma jannibna sh-shaytan, wa jannibi sh-shaytana ma razaqtana,’ [In the name of Allah, O Allah, protect us from Satan, and keep Satan away from the blessings You bestow upon us], then, should a child be ordained for them in that instance, Satan will not be able to harm the child ever.’”

(Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab ad-du‘awat, Bab ma yaqulu idha ata ahlah, Hadith 6388)

Compassion in action: Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Malta’s charity outreach

0
Laiq Ahmed Atif, President Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Malta

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Malta had the opportunity to serve the people in need and organise the following visits to different homes and centres to extend its solidarity, message of peace and brotherhood and to present them with gift hampers.

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Malta organised five charity visits during December 2023 and distributed a total of 350 gift hampers and 100 New Year calendars published by the Jamaat during these visits, including Komunità Santa Marija – Sedqa, a rehabilitation centre for drug addictsCaritas Malta’s San Blas Therapeutic Community, Happy Parenting Malta, Mosta Food Bank and Saint Vincent de Paul, a long-term care facility for the elderly.

During the visits to the rehabilitation centres, we had the opportunity to meet the residents and share some thoughts with them that will be helpful for them to complete the rehabilitation programme successfully with a positive outcome. The local missionary highlighted the purpose of the visit and what Islam Ahmadiyyat stands for.

During our visit to the old house of Saint Vincent de Paul, we had the opportunity to meet the most vulnerable people, who are rarely visited by their families and some of whom no one visits.

Jalsa Seerat-un-Nabi held in Bradford East, Canada

0
Touseef Ahmad Rehan, Secretary Ishaat, Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Bradford East, Canada

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Bradford East, Canada, organised Jalsa Seerat-un-Nabi on 19 December 2023. Arrangements for Lajna members and nasirat to listen to the event were made at the Baitul Khabeer Mosque, whereas arrangements for khuddamansar and atfal were made at the Bradford Community Center.

The event was presided over by Jameel Ahmad Sahib, Regional Amir, Northern Ontario.

The formal programme started with the recitation from the Holy Quran with its English and Urdu translations, followed by a poem in praise of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa.

The first speech was delivered by Qasim Ghumman Sahib, a missionary. The speech focused on “The Holy Prophet Muhammadsa: A Perfect Man”.

This was followed by an Arabic qasidah recited by a group of Atfal.

Another address was delivered by Ansar Raza Sahib, a missionary, on “Prince of Peace: Holy Prophet Muhammadsa”.

The event concluded with a silent prayer.

A total of 85 men and 95 women attended the event in person. Moreover, 47 families listened to the proceedings virtually.

Seeking divine pleasure in every endeavor

0

“There is no certainty about death. […] Understand that your creation by God Almighty is purposed towards His worship and devotion. The world should not be your primary goal. I repeatedly emphasise this point because, in my view, this is the sole reason for human existence, yet it is what humanity is most heedless of. I do not advocate abandoning worldly engagements or isolating yourself from your wife and children in a jungle or mountain. Islam does not permit such asceticism; it is not in line with Islamic teachings. Islam aims to make a person active, alert, and prepared. Therefore, I advise engaging in your businesses with effort and perseverance. It is mentioned in Hadith that one who owns land and neglects its cultivation will be held accountable. So, if anyone interprets [what I have said] as a directive to abandon worldly affairs, they are mistaken. The essence is that in all your undertakings, seek God Almighty’s pleasure, and do not prioritise your desires or emotions over His command.”

(Al Hakam, 10 August 1901, p. 2)

Opinion: The tortuous road to climate justice

0
Fazal Masood Malik & Farhan Khokhar, Canada

The choice of venue and leadership for the latest COP28 climate conference stirred controversy. Hosting the summit in Abu Dhabi, a major oil and gas hub, and selecting Sultan Al Jaber, an industry executive, as chairperson cast doubt regarding potential fossil fuel influence. This immediate perception challenge was viewed by some environmental advocates as an intentional affront. However, other pragmatic voices sought to reserve judgement, wanting instead to gauge COP28’s capacity to deliver tangible climate progress despite the questionable optics surrounding both the location and leadership of the event. 

As with other multilateral efforts under UN and ICC auspices, substantial progress continued to prove difficult at COP28. The persistent impasse between Global North and Global South countries remains a deeply entrenched divide, blocking consensus. Similarly, tensions between wealthy and developing nations, often stymieing these critical international dialogues, still need to be addressed in a more equitable fashion.

In the end, COP28 failed to deliver climate justice by most measures. Despite over 100 countries backing a definitive fossil fuel phase-out, including vulnerable small island states and major European powers, the final text omitted such a commitment. Instead, watered-down wording called for “transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner, accelerating action in this critical decade.” (www.ox.ac.uk/news/2023-12-13-expert-comment-it-remarkable-how-much-we-agree-cop28-and-transition-fossil-fuels)

For many supporters of bold action, this deal represented another compromise producing inequitable outcomes. Without unified steps to curb emissions at their main source – carbon-intensive energy – already impacted communities will continue shouldering the gravest climate consequences.

An agreement with loopholes bigger than an oil tanker!

Despite the European Commission’s pronouncement that COP28 represents the inception of fossil fuels’ demise, substantial doubt persists regarding its capacity to meet stated climate objectives. While affirming the agreement as forward progress, achieving the critical 1.5°C warming threshold will undeniably prove even more challenging now.

The much-lauded “loss & damage fund” remained on the books with promises of billions of dollars. Nevertheless, it fell short of the actual economic catastrophe faced by smaller nations.

Attention turns to COP29 and whether selecting another hydrocarbon-reliant nation, Azerbaijan, as host in 2024 can shift the justice needle. Will equitable accountability and collective ambient preservation finally prevail?

Solving the entwined dilemma of just environmental stewardship demands a strategic approach in which Western, more developed nations accept responsibility for the harm and developing countries learn from the mistakes of the past. Working together, the world must strive towards saving Pacific island nations who are on the brink of an inevitable environmental disaster, a taste of which is now seen by prosperous countries through their own extreme climate change.

No simple policy can instantly launch a worldwide transformation on the scale climate science demands. Funds and technical assistance alone cannot redress the toxic legacy trailing vulnerable nations. Nor will voluntary carbon trading or eventual emissions regulation sustain most at-risk peoples and ecosystems. Avoiding 1.5°C warming requires not just decarbonisation but also proactive actions from the very people demanding such.

An ethical reckoning is needed before realigning incentives and power structures towards environmental justice. This responsibility extends across borders and generations. Our present path sees those least culpable for destabilising Earth’s climate left grappling with irreparable loss and damage. From fire-ravaged forests to flooded cities, the costs accumulate for communities with minimal resources to absorb or escape such shocks. Each year, lost to obstructions and half-measures, further forecloses possibilities for humans to thrive.

There is another angle for humanity to consider: old-fashioned living within our means. While tackling climate meltdown demands sweeping systemic change, the quest for sustainability begins from within. Beyond reforming corrupted policies and processes, each of us must reflect on how our values and behaviours impact the planet. 

Islam teaches that true happiness does not stem from material excess, but from spiritual fulfilment through righteous living. 

The Islamic emphasis on moderation (Surah al-Furqan, Ch. 25: V.68 and Surah al-A’raf, Ch. 7: V.32) extends to ecological spheres as well, urging followers to live simply within their means. (Surah al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.61) A life lived mindfully and within means will help curb lifestyles that drive resource depletion and result in emissions escalation. Channelling savings towards community uplift (zakat) rather than individual indulgence synchronises with religious directives to show compassion for the most vulnerable sectors of our society.

Our climate reckoning thus implicates questions of both personal and global responsibility. Self-reflection is the crucial key that must be utilised before having a more extensive discussion on the global environment.

Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmadaa, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, has reminded us to reflect on our internal environment by asking ourselves if we offer prayers as they were meant to be. Do we treat humanity with kindness and respect? Do our words reflect peace, and do our deeds promote harmony? If so, this goodwill can inspire the system-wide change Earth demands.

Every one of us must start from within, realigning priorities before seeking transformation. An Islamic ethic guided by social justice is the only way to redefine notions of sustainable development for the challenging future ahead.

Tawaffa decoded: An exploration of its linguistic dimensions

1
Arslan Ijaz, Student Jamia Ahmadiyya UK
Quran

The tawaffi – or causing the death – of Jesusas is a crucial topic for the glory of Islam. The Arabic verb tawaffa – توفى – is derived from the three root letters و- ف – ي (waw-fa-ya). The verbal noun is توفي (tawaffi). Generally speaking, this word has always been commonly associated with the meaning of death and dying among Arabs. The understanding of this verb in the Quranic paradigm is specific and carries the meaning “to cause to die” or “to take the soul,” which occurs at death or sleep, emphasising the divine control over life and death.

The importance of this verb lies in its usage twice in the Holy Quran for Prophet Jesusas. While Ahmadi Muslims interpret it as relating to “death,” many Muslim counterparts attempt to use alternative meanings such as “to take,” “to take up physically,” “to take in full,” and “to gather” in their translations. This is done in an effort to support the belief that Jesusas is still alive in the heavens. Since the translation suggesting Prophet Jesus’as natural death does not align with their beliefs, they seek to reconcile the verses by linking it to his physical bodily ascension. However, this perspective is to be deemed incorrect and out of context, as will be explained further.

Understanding of tawaffa when used for inanimate objects

Generally speaking, outside of the Quran, when this verb is not used in regard to Allah and applies to an inanimate object, it can give the meaning “to take”. In other words, when Allah is not the subject (fa‘il) and the action is being done upon something that does not have a soul, then this meaning is given. For example, تَوَفّى حَقَّهُ (tawaffa haqqahu) means “he took his share or right”.

Understanding of tawaffa within the Holy Quran

However, this is not the case in the Holy Quran. This word adheres to a specific principle in the Quran. The principle dictates that whenever it is used to denote Allah performing an action upon something with a soul, it can never signify physical ascension across the Quran or the ahadith. Therefore, when the following three conditions are met, the verb tawaffa exclusively conveys the meaning of “giving death” or “putting to sleep” within a specific context. The interpretation of “to take” has no basis at all in such instances.

(i) When the verb tawaffa or its derivatives are used in this specific verb form (this shall be explained later on);

(ii) The subject (fa‘il) is Allah or the angels;

(iii) The object (maf‘ul bihi) has a soul and is not an inanimate object.

In such a case, the meaning “to take” can never be applied as the conditions for this have not been met.

Where does this principle or rule derive from?

As previously stated, tawaffa, with those three conditions being met, can only have two meanings – (i) death or (ii) sleep – and this with a specific connotation. At this junction, one may question where this principle stems from and how we have reached this conclusion and rule. The fact of the matter is that Allah has Himself defined tawaffa in the Holy Quran by providing only these two possible meanings and thus this clarifies the matter:

اَللّٰہُ يَتَوَفَّي الۡاَنۡفُسَ حِيۡنَ مَوۡتِہَا وَالَّتِيۡ لَمۡ تَمُتۡ فِيۡ مَنَامِہَا ۚ فَيُمۡسِکُ الَّتِيۡ قَضٰي عَلَيۡہَا الۡمَوۡتَ وَيُرۡسِلُ الۡاُخۡرٰۤي اِلٰۤي اَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّي ؕ اِنَّ فِيۡ ذٰلِکَ لَاٰيٰتٍ لِّقَوۡمٍ يَّتَفَکَّرُوۡنَ

“Allah takes away the souls of human beings at the time of their death; and during their sleep of those [also] that are not [yet] dead. And then He retains those against which He has decreed death, and sends back the others till an appointed term. In that surely are Signs for a people who reflect.” (Surah az-Zumar, Ch.39: V.43)

Allah has provided only these two possible meanings of tawaffa here – either death or sleep. If there was any other third possible meaning of physical ascension, then Allah would have explained it to us.

Differentiating when tawaffa means sleep and when it means death

The question now arises: After these three conditions are met and we realise that the only possible meanings are death or sleep, how do we differentiate when it means death and when it means sleep? In response to this, the established principle is that when there is no specific mention or indication of sleep, it always, without exception, means death. However, if an indication (qarinah) to sleep is present in the sentence, using words such as night (layl) or sleep (nawm or manaam), then it conveys the meaning of sleep. Thus, by adding a fourth condition to the aforementioned ones, in such a scenario, it always and unequivocally means death.

(i) When the verb tawaffa or its derivatives are used in this specific verb form (this shall be explained later on);

(ii) The subject (fa‘il) is Allah or the angels ;

(iii) The object (maf‘ul bihi) has a soul and is not an inanimate object;

(iv) There is no indication (qarinah) towards sleep in the sentence or the context.

In such a case, the verb tawaffa will always mean death. This is the case in the Quran, ahadith and classical Arabic literature. This is also derived from the aforementioned verse, which states that as for the soul that has not died, then tawaffa happens at sleep.

The challenge of the Promised Messiahas

This was also a challenge from the Promised Messiahas, who wrote:

“If anyone can cite a single instance from the Holy Quran or the Hadith, or from classical or modern Arabic poetry and prose, that the word tawaffa, when applied to anything with a soul, God being the subject, has been used in any connotation other than death […], I bind myself on oath that I shall pay that person one thousand rupees in cash by selling some of my property and shall always hold him in high esteem as a great scholar of the Holy Quran and Hadith.” (Izala-e Awham, Pt. II, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 3, p. 603)

No one to this day has been able to disprove this challenge. Hazrat Ahmadas also wrote in the same book:

“What I discovered on checking every page of the compilations of Sahih BukhariSahih MuslimTirmidhiIbn MajahAbu DawudNasa’iDarimiMuwatta’, and Sharh as-sunnah, etc., was that the expression ‘tawaffa’ has been used three hundred and forty-six times, and in no single instance has it been used, either by the Holy Prophetsa or by his Companionsra, to mean anything other than ‘death’, or ‘taking possession of the soul’. I have gone through these books with great care, line by line, and I can say that on each and every occasion, the expression tawaffa has been used only in the connotation of death or taking possession of the soul.” (Ibid., pp. 583-585)

Tawaffa happens of the souls, not the physical bodies

Furthermore, the verse (Surah az-Zumar, Ch.39: V.43) quoted previously shows that tawaffa only happens to the souls and not to the worldly physical bodies. This is why souls have been mentioned explicitly in this verse as the object of the verb. Tawaffa has nothing to do with the physical body. At the time of death or sleep, the soul is taken but the physical body remains in this world; it is not affected. Thus, the meaning that the non-Ahmadi Muslims impose of taking the physical body up has no basis, as the influence of tawaffa is upon the souls. Not only is this clarified by Allah Himself in the aforementioned verse, but many of the Arabic dictionaries, including Lisan al-‘ArabTaj al-‘Arus and al-Qamus, confirm the fact that with the abovementioned conditions tawaffa happens to the soul and not the body.

To further support this, we see that the word tawaffa or one of its derivatives has been used a total of 25 times in the Quran. Here are all the verses in which “tawaffa” is used in the Quran:

2:235, 2:241, 3:56, 3:194, 4:16, 4:98, 5:118, 6:62, 7:38, 7:127, 8:51, 10:47, 10:105, 12:102, 13:41, 16:29, 16:33, 16:71, 22:6, 32:12, 40:68, 40:78, 47:28, 6:61, 39:43

In Surah al-An‘am, Ch.6: V.61, and Surah az-Zumar, Ch.39: V.43, it means sleep as the words “night” and “sleep” are present, which are a direct indication towards sleep. In the rest of the 23 verses, the verb always means death.

Thus, we realise that in all 25 instances, not once has it been used to mean anything other than death or sleep. There is no third meaning ever used in the Quran. Whenever sleep had been alluded to, the indication was present. So, I ask, why do non-Ahmadi Muslims try to forcefully attempt to say that in verses 3:56 and 5:118, when it is referring to Jesusas specifically, it does not mean death but rather physical bodily ascension? This meaning goes against the understanding of the usage of this verb and the established principles.

Quranic usage of tawaffa for Jesusas and the true understanding

It would be appropriate now to quickly mention the two verses that use this word in regards to Jesusas for a more complete understanding of the subject at hand:

اِذۡ قَالَ اللّٰہُ يٰعِيۡسٰۤي اِنِّيۡ مُتَوَفِّيۡکَ وَرَافِعُکَ اِلَيَّ وَمُطَہِّرُکَ مِنَ الَّذِيۡنَ کَفَرُوۡا وَجَاعِلُ الَّذِيۡنَ اتَّبَعُوۡکَ فَوۡقَ الَّذِيۡنَ کَفَرُوۡۤا اِلٰي يَوۡمِ الۡقِيٰمَةِ ۚ ثُمَّ اِلَيَّ مَرۡجِعُکُمۡ فَاَحۡکُمُ بَيۡنَکُمۡ فِيۡمَا کُنۡتُمۡ فِيۡہِ تَخۡتَلِفُوۡنَ

“When Allah said, ‘O Jesus, I will cause thee to die [a natural death] and will exalt thee to Myself, and will clear thee from [the charges of] those who disbelieve, and will place those who follow thee above those who disbelieve, until the Day of Resurrection; then to Me shall be your return, and I will judge between you concerning that wherein you differ.’” (Surah Aal-e-`Imran, Ch.3: V.56)

The Ahmadi Muslim translation translates tawaffa as “to cause to die [a natural death]”, and rafa‘a as “to exalt [in status]”.

If we examine the context, the Jews aimed to cause Jesusas to die by specifically crucifying him, intending to demonstrate that he was accursed—following the prevalent tradition of that time. By orchestrating this, they sought to establish that he did not hold a lofty status and, God forbid, was falsely claiming prophethood. In response, Allah assured Jesusas of a natural death, ensuring he would not be killed at the hands of the Jews. Additionally, Allah emphasised that Jesusas held an elevated status, refuting any notion of him being a false claimant to prophethood or accursed. This straightforward interpretation clarifies the verse. The Jews’ accusation was not that he couldn’t ascend to the skies physically; rather, their claim was that he lacked an elevated status, attempting to subject him to an accursed death. Therefore, this understanding aligns with both context and linguistic accuracy.

The second verse, which uses this verb for Jesusas is as follows:

وَاِذۡ قَالَ اللّٰہُ يٰعِيۡسَي ابۡنَ مَرۡيَمَ ءَاَنۡتَ قُلۡتَ لِلنَّاسِ اتَّخِذُوۡنِيۡ وَاُمِّيَ اِلٰہَيۡنِ مِنۡ دُوۡنِ اللّٰہِ ؕ قَالَ سُبۡحٰنَکَ مَا يَکُوۡنُ لِيۡۤ اَنۡ اَقُوۡلَ مَا لَيۡسَ لِيۡ ٭ بِحَقٍّ ؕ؃ اِنۡ کُنۡتُ قُلۡتُہٗ فَقَدۡ عَلِمۡتَہٗ ؕ تَعۡلَمُ مَا فِيۡ نَفۡسِيۡ وَلَاۤ اَعۡلَمُ مَا فِيۡ نَفۡسِکَ ؕ اِنَّکَ اَنۡتَ عَلَّامُ الۡغُيُوۡبِ ۔ مَا قُلۡتُ لَہُمۡ اِلَّا مَاۤ اَمَرۡتَنِيۡ بِہٖۤ اَنِ اعۡبُدُوا اللّٰہَ رَبِّيۡ وَرَبَّکُمۡ ۚ وَکُنۡتُ عَلَيۡہِمۡ شَہِيۡدًا مَّا دُمۡتُ فِيۡہِمۡ فَلَمَّا تَوَفَّيۡتَنِيۡ کُنۡتَ اَنۡتَ الرَّقِيۡبَ عَلَيۡہِمۡ ؕ وَاَنۡتَ عَلٰي کُلِّ شَيۡءٍ شَہِيۡدٌ

“And when Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary, didst thou say to men, ‘Take me and my mother for two gods beside Allah?’”, he will answer, “Holy art Thou. I could never say that to which I had no right. If I had said it, Thou wouldst have surely known it. Thou knowest what is in my mind, and I know not what is in Thy mind. It is only Thou Who art the Knower of hidden things.

“I said nothing to them except that which Thou didst command me — ‘Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.’ And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them, but since Thou didst cause me to die, Thou hast been the Watcher over them; and Thou art Witness over all things.” (Surah Al-Ma’idah, Ch.5: V.117-118)

The first question to consider is why Jesusas does not know the condition of people after him on the Day of Judgement. This fact implies that the Jesusas mentioned has indeed passed away and will not return. For if he is to physically return, then surely he would know how the Christians have taken him to be a god, and if he knows and witnesses this, then how can he, God forbid, speak a lie to God stating that he did not know: “And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them, but since Thou didst cause me to die, Thou hast been the Watcher over them”.

The usage of tawaffa for the Holy Prophetsa

The Holy Quran and the ahadith have both used this verb for the Holy Prophetsa. Why is it that Muslims who interpret tawaffa to mean that Jesusas was physically raised do not translate this as physical bodily ascension as well?

The Quran says:

وَاِمَّا نُرِيَنَّکَ بَعۡضَ الَّذِيۡ نَعِدُہُمۡ اَوۡ نَتَوَفَّيَنَّکَ فَاِلَيۡنَا مَرۡجِعُہُمۡ ثُمَّ اللّٰہُ شَہِيۡدٌ عَلٰي مَا يَفۡعَلُوۡنَ

“And if We show thee [in thy lifetime the fulfilment of] some of the things with which We have threatened them, [thou wilt know it]; or if We cause thee to die [before that], then to Us is their return, [and thou wilt see the fulfilment in the next world]; and Allah is Witness to all that they do.” (Surah Yunus, Ch.10: V.47)

Next is the hadith mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari, where the Holy Prophetsa used the same verse that was quoted for Jesusas himself. Both usages should either indicate death or physical bodily ascension.

Ibn Abbasra narrated that Allah’s Messengersa delivered a sermon and said, “O people! You will be gathered before Allah barefooted, naked, and uncircumcised.” He went on to say, “Some men from my followers will be brought, and then the angels will drive them to the left side (Hell-Fire). I will say. ‘O, my Lord! They are my companions!’ A reply will come from the Almighty, ‘You do not know what they did after you.’ I will say as the pious slave [Prophet Jesusas] said:

‏وَكُنْتُ عَلَيْهِمْ شَهِيدًا مَا دُمْتُ فِيهِمْ فَلَمَّا تَوَفَّيْتَنِي كُنْتَ أَنْتَ الرَّقِيبَ عَلَيْهِمْ‏

This hadith is mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari (Kitab at-tafsir, Hadith 4625). Now, it is evident that the Holy Prophetsa was not physically raised, as we all know he experienced a natural death. Therefore, if the Holy Prophetsa is using this verse to imply his natural demise, why should we conclude that Jesusas was raised physically?

Non-Ahmadi response: 1

Non-Ahmadi Muslims are eager to find escape routes and the general escape route recently seen on social media is of two types. One group of interpreters tries to associate tawaffa with Jesusas falling asleep before he ascended to heaven, while others do so by associating tawaffa with the ascension itself.

As for falling asleep before ascension, we have already explained how a qarinah indicating sleep is necessary for it to mean sleep and the challenge of the Promised Messiahas still stands firm on this even after 134 years. As for tawaffa referring to the physical ascension itself, this meaning is impossible according to how Allah has defined tawaffa in the Quran. Do they consider themselves so knowledgeable as to be able to imply completely out-of-hand meanings that go against the Quran for it to match their fabricated belief? Why do they try to impose a third meaning when Allah has only offered two possibilities?

Non-Ahmadi response – 2: Usage of different verb forms

Others try to quote verbs that are not from the verb form of tawaffa and then claim their meanings for this very verb. Instead of using the verb tawaffa-yatawaffa (Verb Form V), they use the verb waffa-yuwaffi (Verb Form II) or istawfa-yastawfi (Verb Form X).

Most Arabic words are derived from a trilateral, i.e., three-letter root. That trilateral root can produce many verbs in different forms stemming from the same root. These different verb forms are known as abwab (sg. bab) in Arabic morphology and there are a total of ten main verb forms in the Arabic language. Each verb form follows a specific pattern of consonants and vowels, and it contributes to the overall meaning and function of the verb. When we refer to the verb tawaffa which is derived from the three root letters waw-fa-ya, we are referring to Form V of the Arabic verb forms known as bab at-tafa‘‘ul. Our principle is based on this verb form.

However, when non-Ahmadi Muslims come across the challenge of the Promised Messiahas in regards to the verb tawaffa, and realise they cannot find any such example that goes against the principle, they then try to quote verbs from outside of Form V, which themselves are completely different verbs despite coming from the same root. Furthermore, from the conditions mentioned, the very first one was that the word tawaffa has to be used in this very form, which is Form V, i.e., bab at-tafa‘‘ul. Instead of using this verb in Form V, they quote this verb being used in Form II (bab at-taf‘il) or sometimes from Form X (bab al-istif‘al).

For example, they quote the verb tuwaffa, which is in the passive form of Form II which is not the same as tawaffa despite it sounding similar. Arabic is an intricate language; a mere change in the vowels and letters can make a huge difference. So when someone claims tuwaffa is the same as tawaffa, then it is not the same verb.

Non-Ahmadi response – 3: The Maliki approach

We also come across a small number of Muslims who label themselves as Malikis and believe that Jesusas did die, but only for a few hours, and was thereafter once again raised from the dead and given life. Such Malikis quote references from Ibn ‘Ashur and others. However, the Quran makes it clear in numerous places that someone who dies cannot be resurrected and given life again.

Non-Ahmadi response – 4: Meaning of ‘taking the soul’, figurative

Another response that is given is that the meaning that we apply is a figurative (majazi) meaning and the real literal (haqiqi) meaning is just ‘to take’.

As previously mentioned, this verb is used in a particular context in the Holy Quran, where certain conditions are laid out. When those conditions are met, then it can never mean just ‘to take’ in a physical sense. Furthermore, whenever it is applied to a soul, it always means ‘to take the soul’ and the dictionaries agree with this. The non-Ahmadis have been challenged on this but have not yet found a response to it.

Non-Ahmadi response – 5: Death refers to him dying in the end times

They say that death, in the verses mentioned about Jesusas, refers to his passing away in the end times after he has physically descended. This is not possible because, as mentioned previously in the article, the tawaffa of Jesusas has already happened according to the Surah Al-Ma’idah verse. This is because we see the condition of Christians today as misguided, which was only meant to happen after the tawaffa of Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him.

Unity is key to Muslim progress: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’s lecture at Law College Lahore, 1948

Ata-ul-Haye Nasir, Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre
Unity Muslim

On 12 December 1948, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud, Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra, delivered a lecture at the Maynard Hall (now Sheerani Hall) of the Law College Lahore, titled “Maujooda Halaat mein Aalam-e-Islam ki Haisiyyat aur uska Mustaqbil” – The Status and Future of the Islamic World in Light of the Current Situation. During this lecture, he highlighted the need for Muslim unity. The session commenced at 6:30 pm.

It is important to note here that at the time – for a short while after the Partition of India – Lahore was serving as the markaz of Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya prior to Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra migrating to Rabwah for permanent residence.

Maynard Hall
Maynard Hall (now Sheerani Hall)

Law College Lahore

The Law College of Lahore is a law college of the Punjab University, Lahore. It is the oldest law institute in Pakistan, having been established in 1868. It was the first institute offering legal education to be established in a Muslim-majority area of the Indian Subcontinent. Since then, it has produced some of the most prominent lawyers, activists, statesmen, judges, bureaucrats, and politicians.

Earlier lectures by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra at this venue

In December 1947 and January 1948, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra had delivered five lectures at this hall, as part of a series of six lectures, titled “Pakistan Aur Uska Mustaqbil (Pakistan and its future)”. This series of lectures concluded on 17 January 1948.

For more details, see “Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’s blueprint for a successful Pakistan: Highly praised yet neglected advice”, www.alhakam.org)

President of the session

The session was presided over by Justice Sheikh Abdur Rahman (1903-1990), commonly known as SA Rahman. He served as the 5th Chief Justice of Pakistan. Before the formation of Pakistan, he entered the Indian Civil Service in 1926 and served in the capacity of Assistant Commissioner and District and Sessions Judge in various districts of Punjab. He was appointed Judge of the Lahore High Court in 1946. In 1947, he was appointed as a member of the Bengal Boundary Commission. He retired as the Chief Justice of Pakistan on 3 June 1968.

Punjab University 2
Punjab University, Lahore

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’sra lecture

During the early part of his lecture, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra shed light on the questions as to why the Muslim world holds a distinctive status in the world, what the political circumstances of the world are, and how they are impacting the Muslim world.

In this regard, Huzoorra stated that Islam holds certain distinctive features, and whenever European countries are faced with any issue regarding a certain Muslim country, they give it a religious and international form instead of taking it as a mere political and local issue, meaning that they attribute that specific issue to the whole Muslim world, and by doing so, they themselves acknowledge the Muslim world as a distinct entity.

Speaking about the manner in which the major powers of the world were impacting the Muslim countries at the time, Huzoorra also shed light on the reasons, based on which these major powers desired to weaken the Islamic world.

Mentioning the future of the Islamic world, Huzoorra said:

“In my view, the Islamic world’s future is completely safe, provided we [Muslims] act upon those means of success which the Holy Quran has prescribed for us.”

Narrating those means of success, Huzoorra outlined various proposals, which included:

(1) If European powers themselves acknowledge the Islamic world as a separate entity whenever they are faced with any issue regarding Muslim countries, why should not the Muslim countries foster a true unity and create a Muslim World in its true essence, and in addition to declaring themselves a part of their respective country’s nationalism, why should they not consider themselves as part of a bigger ‘nationalism’ — meaning the Islamic world.

(2) Islamic countries ought to dispel their internal enmities and instil a passion to offer sacrifices for each other.

(3) The people of Muslim countries are required to visit each other’s countries. In this regard, the youth should make collective efforts by establishing societies.

(4) The Muslim countries ought to have trade relations with each other.

(5) We ought to assist the Muslims of those areas that are more underdeveloped — for instance, Western and Eastern Africa, etc. — by establishing supportive anjumans.

(6) The Holy Quran has declared tabligh as the best means for Islam’s progress, so we should pay attention to this.

Maynard Hall
Maynard Hall (now Sheerani Hall)

President’s concluding remarks

After Huzoor’sra lecture, the president of the session delivered the concluding remarks and said:

“Respected Mirza Sahib has spoken on a very vast subject in such a short time, and shed light on its multiple aspects. The constructive suggestions that he has outlined are very precious. We should strive to seriously ponder over them and try to act upon them.” (Al Fazl, 14 December 1948, p. 2)

Coming from every distant track: Kamal Yar Jung’s education committee visits Qadian

A series looking at the high standard of morals of the Promised Messiahas, his Khulafa and the hospitality of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community when receiving visitors

Awwab Saad Hayat, Al Hakam

In the city of Calcutta, British India, an All-India Muslim Educational Conference was held under the presidency of Nawab Kamal Yar Jung Bahadur, a leading voice for Muslims at the time. During the aforementioned conference, an important decision was made to form a commission tasked with submitting a report on how to carry out educational reforms for the Muslim population living in the subcontinent.

On 29 December 1939, in his presidential address at the 52nd annual session of the All-India Muslim Educational Conference held in Calcutta, Nawab Kamal Yar Jung Bahadur said:

“This conference, in my opinion, should immediately formulate its plans on the kind of education that would be appropriate for our children in view of the circumstances in which we find ourselves surrounded in this country.” (Khutba Sadarat, Nawab Kamal Yar Jung, Azim Steam Press, Hyderabad Deccan, p. 6)

He further added:

“The task of forming a system of education for the achievement of the aforementioned objectives should be entrusted to a group of experts in education. For example, a small committee of three members whose duty would be to visit different parts of the country, consult with local experts in education and economics at each centre, and submit their thoughts.” (Ibid.)

Thus, a couple of months later, in February 1940, a decision was made to conduct a detailed survey of Muslim institutions in India. A group was formed for this purpose, consisting of the following members:

1. Sir Azizul Haq, speaker of the Bengal legislative assembly and vice-chancellor of Calcutta University (Chairperson)

2. Maulana Haji Abu al-Hasan, MA, IAS (Retired), former Director of Public Instruction, Jammu and Kashmir State

3. Maulana K. Ali Afzal, BSc (Edinburgh), Barrister-at-Law, Secretary, Bengal Legislative Assembly

4. Mr Baqa Muhammad Khan, Chief Inspector of Schools, Bahawalpur State

5. Maulana Asadul Haq, MA, Personal Assistant to the Chairman

In accordance with the aforementioned decision, the committee members inspected Muslim institutions in South India for three months, focusing on how religious and Islamic education was being imparted in different madrasas.

On 22 September 1940, the educational delegation arrived in North India for two months. After visiting various Islamic schools in the province, they arrived in Qadian – the abode of peace – on 23 October 1940, at 8:30 pm on the night train.

The committee’s report includes the published itinerary of the tour, which was completed with the cooperation of the Railways. The itinerary states:

‘‘23 October, Wednesday: Departure from Batala at 8:00 pm

“23 October, Wednesday: Arrival in Qadian at 8:23 pm

“25 October, Friday: Departure from Qadian at 5:50 am

“24 October, Friday: Arrival in Batala at 6:15 am’’ (Report of the Kamal Yar Jung Education Committee, p. 322, indianculture.gov.in)

During their brief stay in Qadian, the committee not only closely studied the madrasas but also had the chance of meeting Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra, and was very impressed.

In the presence of Maulana Haji Abu al-Hasan Sahib MA, Khan Bahadur Maulana Azizul Haq Sahib, the chairman of the committee, addressed the representative of Al Fazl, Master Muhammad Ibrahim Sahib BA:

“We have achieved significant success in our objective of studying the educational system of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat. Upon engaging in conversation with many friends, we have heard their thoughts, which have greatly influenced our own. Our visit to Qadian provided us with insights and experience. Consequently, we have come to the conclusion that we are full of feelings of appreciation and respect.”

With regard to their meeting with Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra, they said, “We had a meeting with the Imam of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, lasting about an hour, during which we listened to his views. These insights are extremely valuable for the objective of our committee; we have gained much from them and our hearts are genuinely filled with praise and appreciation for him.” (Al Fazl, 27 October 1940, p. 5)
Then, regarding the Jamaat, they expressed:

“We have carefully studied the Jamaat’s system, and it is clear that it is rendering valuable service to Islam. Despite disagreements among some Muslims regarding your beliefs, your work is truly commendable and holds great value for Islam.” (Ibid.)

In short, this committee not only included Qadian in the list of renowned educational institutions in the provinces, states, cities, and throughout India, but also wrote in its report:

“The Islamic High School at Qadian is teaching theology all through according to their tenets. Theology teaching is an essential part of the curriculum and is better organised. Beginning from the 5th class, the Holy Quran’s translation with brief commentary is finished in the 10th grade, and to a certain extent, Hadith is taught. Lectures and discourses are also given from time to time on topics of Islamic interest.” (Report of the Kamal Yar Jung Education Committee, p. 194)

Without a doubt, the educational system that was established and originated from the Madrasa Talim-ul-Islam [lit. ‘Education of Islam’], founded by the Promised Messiahas, has proven itself to be the genuine form of “education of Islam”. As an illustration of the superiority of this Ahmadiyya educational system, we present the following brief incident:

In October 1910, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira sent a delegation of Ahmadi missionaries on a tour of Uttar Pradesh. Following successful lectures at the conferences in Kanpur and Etawah, the aforementioned delegation arrived in Lucknow, where they met with Maulana Shibli Nomani, the founder of Darul Uloom Nadwah. Maulana Shibli Nomani was very kind, and in addition to other aspects, he said:

“I have been pondering over a challenging and significant issue for a while now, especially in the past six months. However, I’m struggling to see what the best course of action is. If we focus solely on teaching students Arabic sciences, the longstanding issues of lethargy, weakness, and lack of motivation that affect Muslims today may persist. On the other hand, introducing even a small drop of Western sciences seems to lead them to completely abandon their religion. We are contemplating as to what steps we should take. However, I have observed a commendable quality in your Jamaat—its members are not only educated in English but also remain fully committed to their religion.” (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 3, pp. 327-328)