Home Blog Page 596

Prophecies of the Promised Messiah a.s.: Plague and Earthquakes

rsz_screen_shot_2018-05-15_at_171637.png

An allegation raised by opponents of the Jamaat and Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Promised Messiahas is that he stated in his book Chashma-e-Marifat, published in 1908, that the miracles displayed by him numbered 100,000 or more and that the earthquakes and plague that occurred in his age belonged to those miracles that were bestowed to him from Allah the Almighty.

In response to this, opponents suggest that the world witnessed earthquakes and plagues at all times. Before the claim of the founder of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, plagues wiped out a hundred times more individuals than those who died in his age. For instance, in the 14th century, one third of the total population of Europe was totally wiped out from the face of the Earth due to the plague.

They then ask whether this can be compared with the plague that spread in India. The plague that occurred in India was nothing as compared to that of Europe. Similarly, the earthquake of 1905, although it was effective, but comparing it with massive earthquakes, it seems ordinary.

The founder of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat claimed to be the Promised Messiah and several religions acknowledge this fact that the Promised Messiah would appear close to Judgement Day i.e. it would be the last age. The Bible, the Holy Quran and the Hadith contain different prophesies about the arrival and time of the Promised Messiah.

Jesusas pointed out various signs regarding his second coming, as it is stated in the Gospel of Matthew:

“As Jesus was sitting on the mount of olives, the disciples came to him privately. ‘Tell us,’ they said, ‘when will this happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?’ Jesus answered: ‘Watch out that no one deceives you. For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Christ’ and will deceive many. You will hear of wars and rumours of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come. Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places.” (Matthew, 24:3-7)

Similarly, it is stated in the Gospel of Luke:

“‘Teacher,’ they asked, ‘when will these things happen? And what will be the sign that they are about to take place?’ He replied: ‘Watch out that you are not deceived. For many will come in my name, claiming, “I am he,” and, “The time is near.” Do not follow them. When you hear of wars and revolution, do not be frightened. These things must happen first, but the end will not come right away.’ Then he said to them: ‘Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various places, and fearful events and great signs from heaven.’” (Luke, 21:7-11)

Luke states that these incidents would occur before the second coming of Jesusas, but the intellect proves it wrong because punishment befalls people when the law is violated and not before it. Great catastrophes engulf the Earth only after the appearance and denial of a prophet. As it is stated in the Holy Quran:

وَمَا کُنَّا مُعَذِّبِیْنَ حَتّٰی نَبْعَثَ رَسُوْلًا

 “We never punish until We have sent a Messenger” (Surah Bani Israil, Ch.17: V.16).

Similarly, it is stated in the Bible, “I myself will call to account anyone who does not listen to my words that the prophet speaks in my name.” (Deuteronomy, 18: 19)

Regarding the arrival of the Promised Messiah, it is stated in the Gospel of Matthew that he would appear suddenly, which also shows that the catastrophes would occur after the advent of the Promised Messiah. Hence, Jesusas said:

“Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into. So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.” (Matthew, 24: 42-44)

Similarly, it is stated in the Gospel of Mark:

“But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come. It’s like a man going away: He leaves his house and puts his servants in charge, each with their assigned task, and tells the one at the door to keep watch. Therefore keep watch because you do not know when the owner of the house will come back – whether in the evening, or at midnight, or when the rooster crows, or at dawn. If he comes suddenly, do not let him find you sleeping. What I say to you, I say to everyone: ‘Watch!’”  (Mark, 13: 32-37)

The Holy Prophetsa, highlighting the signs of the final days, stated:

تکثر الزلازل

“Earthquakes shall occur frequently.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Fitan)

Thus, the earthquakes or plague that occurred before the advent of the Promised Messiahas are not under discussion as they are not associated with the prophecies of his age. The earthquakes and plague that engulfed the Earth in the era of the Promised Messiahas are in accord with the prophecies. Hence, comparing them with previously occurred catastrophes seems illogical.

The Promised Messiahas received a revelation from Allah the Almighty:

“A warner came unto the world, but the world accepted him not; yet God shall accept him and demonstrate his truthfulness with mighty assaults.” (Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya Part IV, p. 435 [English translation])

Accordingly, Allah the Almighty demonstrated the truth of the Promised Messiahas with powerful assaults. Earthquakes and plagues occur naturally, but when they occur in accordance with prophecies, then they are considered as a sign. Similarly, wars take place between two sides and one of them turns out victorious, but when it is foretold that a particular side would triumph, then its victory becomes a sign. As for the wars that were fought in the era of the Holy Prophetsa against the opponents, they were divine signs because it was foretold by Allah the Almighty that the Holy Prophetsa would triumph.

Likewise, tempests and floods occur naturally; moreover, ships and vessels are built, but Noah’s Ark stands out as a sign as it was built under the command of the Divine, carrying a glad tiding that those who would mount Noah’s Ark would be saved from the flood.

The same is the case of marriages; people are united in marriages and blessed with children, but when glad tidings are given regarding the birth of a child, it is considered a sign. Hence, it is stated in the Holy Quran:

فَبَشَّرْنٰھَا بِاِسْحٰقَ وَمِنْ وَّرَاءِ اِسْحٰقَ یَعْقُوْبَ

“We gave her glad tidings of the birth of Isaac and, after Isaac, of Jacob” (Surah Hud, Ch.11: V.72). So, the births of Isaac and Jacob happened as a sign, and denying this fact on the basis that many people are blessed with even more children than the mother of Isaac and Jacob seems irrational.

Referring to the sign of plague, the Promised Messiahas states:

“Let it also be borne in mind that both the Holy Quran and even certain books of the Torah foretell that plague will break out in the time of the Promised Messiah. In fact, the Messiah, peace be upon him, also spoke of this in the Gospel. It is impossible for the prophecies of the Messengers to be revoked.” (Noah’s Ark, pp. 7-8)

Below is the list of deaths that occurred due to the outbreak of plague in India between the years 1896 to 1906, according to Encyclopedia Britannica:

1896: 2,219 deaths

1897: 47,974 deaths

1898: 89,265 deaths

1899: 102,369 deaths

1900: 73,576 deaths

1901: 236,433 deaths

1902: 452,655 deaths

1903: 684,445 deaths

1904: 938,010 deaths

1905: 940,881 deaths

1906: 300,355 deaths

(Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. xxi, p. 700 [edition 1911])

This clearly shows that the plague killed 3,868,182 people in India alone in the span of almost 11 years.

The New Encyclopedia Britannica states:

“An outbreak in Canton and Hong Kong in 1894 left 80,000 to 100,000 dead, and within 20 years the disease spread from the southern Chinese ports throughout the whole world, resulting in more than 10,000,000 deaths.” (The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Wol. 9, p.493 [15th edition, 2010])

Opponents allege regarding the earthquake of 1905 that it seems ordinary when compared with various other massive earthquakes.

The earthquake of 1905 holds significant prominence because it occurred according to the divine prophecy vouchsafed to the Promised Messiahas. Thus, comparing this earthquake with various other earthquakes cannot be considered just in any way.

As the births of Isaac and Jacob proved to be divine signs for the reason that glad tidings preceded them, the earthquake of 1905 belongs to the sign of the Divine. The Promised Messiahas frequently received revelations about the occurrence of this earthquake from Allah the Almighty which were published from time to time.

Al Hakam (Urdu) wrote under the heading Revelations and Dreams:

“I [Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas] saw in a dream that someone said:

زلزلہ كا دهكا

‘Shock of an earthquake.’ I saw the house shaking but did not see anything fall, nor did I feel the earthquake. Then came the revelation:

اِنَّ اللّٰهَ لَا يَضُرُّ۔ اِنَّ اللّٰهَ مَعَ الَّذِيْنَ اتَّقَوْا وَّ الَّذِيْنَ هُمْ مُحْسِنُوْنَ۔ تَريٰ نَصْرًا مِّنْ عِنْدِ اللّٰهِ وَ هُمْ يَعْمَهُوْنَ

‘Allah will cause no damage. Allah is with those who are righteous and who do their duty to the utmost. You will see help from Allah and they will continue to flounder.’” (Al Hakam, 17-24 December 1903, p. 15)

Similarly, under the heading God’s Pure Words, the weekly Al Badr had it:

“On 19 December 1903, in a dream I saw someone saying:

زلزلہ كا ايك دهكا

‘A single shock of an earthquake.’ Neither did I feel any tremors, nor did the walls shake. Thereafter, I received the revelation [same Arabic as above], ‘Allah will cause no damage. Allah is with those who are righteous and who do their duty to the utmost. You will see help from Allah and they will continue to flounder.’” (Al Badr, 1 January 1904, p. 6)

Then, under Revelations, the weekly Al Hakam (Urdu) says:

“8 June 1904:

عَفَتِ الدِّيَارُ مَحَلُّهَا وَ مُقَامُهَا۔ اِنِّيْ اُحَافِظُ كُلَّ مَنْ فِي الدَّارِ۔ اَعْطَيْتُكَ كُلَّ النَّعِيْمِ

 ‘Temporary residences and permanent ones will be wiped out. I shall safeguard all those who are in this house. I have bestowed upon you all bounties.’” (Al Hakam, 10-17 June 1904, p. 10)

The Promised Messiahas stated about the earthquake that occurred on 4 April 1905:

“This very earthquake which wrought so much damage in the Punjab that, regarding it, researches have been published in the Civil and Military Gazette and other sources that incontrovertibly conclude that an earthquake of such magnitude has not been experienced in the Punjab during the last 1,600 years.” (Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya, Part V [English translation], p. 232)

The Promised Messiahas further states:

“According to research published in the Civil and Military Gazette, the temple at Kangra that was destroyed in the earthquake was about 2,000 years old. Had such earthquakes occurred before, this temple would already have collapsed long ago.” (Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya, Part V, p. 236)

Now, for the benefit of the readers, we present a brief account of the destruction caused by the Kangra earthquake of 4 April 1905.

Hazrat Mufti Muhammad Sadiqra writes in his book, Zikr-e-Habib:

kangrah
The Kangra Earthquake, 1905

“As the earthquake struck on the morning of 4 April 1905, several towns located in the valley of Kangra were destroyed, and the temple of Hindu Goddess, Jwalamukhi blacked out and the building collapsed. On the same morning, a severe earthquake was felt in Qadian around 6:30am. Although some houses collapsed in Lahore and Amritsar, resulting in deaths and injuries to countless individuals, with the blessing of Allah the Almighty no such incident occurred in Qadian.” (Zikr e Habib, pp. 98-99)

It is stated regarding the earthquake of Kangra:

“The Kangra earthquake of 4 April 1905 in the north-west of the Himalayas was the first of several devastating 20th century earthquakes to occur in northern India. The Punjab Government estimated that more than 20,000 people of its 375,000 epicentral population were killed, and that 100,000 buildings were destroyed by the earthquake. Farming was disrupted by the loss of 53,000 domestic animals and extensive damage to a network of hillside aqueducts that had been constructed over many generations. The cost of recovering from the earthquake was estimated at 2.9 million rupees (1905) … There is a dispute in the magnitude of the earthquake; some say it was 7.6 while others say 8.6 on the Richter scale.” (A note on Kangra Earthquake Ms 7.8 of April 1905 by Nicholas Ambraseys and Roger Bilham)

Dharamshala was the central point of District Kangra which was completely obliterated by the earthquake of 1905. Apart from Kangra, tremors were felt in Murree, Jhelum, Gujranwala and Rawalpindi, causing very little damage. Severe shocks were observed in Jammu and Srinagar, resulting in the total destruction of countless buildings while several others were damaged. Many lost their lives in Srinagar. A hundred houses were razed to the ground in Sialkot. Extreme shocks were felt in Shimla as well.

Nobody in the past 1600 years of India ever experienced an earthquake of such a scale as that of the 1905 Kangra earthquake, causing massive destruction, claiming countless lives and wiping out huge buildings. Previously, 2,000 people died in the earthquake of 1819, and 1542 people lost their lives in the earthquake of 1897 that occurred in Shillong, while the earthquake of 1905 singlehandedly claimed more than 20,000 lives.

The opponents should ponder over this fact that in all the destruction and devastation caused by this horrifying earthquake, the glad tiding vouchsafed to the Promised Messiahas was fulfilled, which is as follows:

اِنِّيْ اُحَافِظُ كُلَّ مَنْ فِي الدَّارِ

 “I shall safeguard all those who are in this house” (Al Hakam, 10-17 June 1904, p. 10).

Had the revelation concerning the earthquake been fabricated, Allah the Almighty would have wiped out the very name of the founder of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, but instead, every single individual who belonged to his spiritual house was saved from this catastrophe.

(Research conducted by a panel of scholars at the Research Cell, Rabwah. Translated by Al Hakam)

100 Years Ago… – Tabligh in Baghdad

Al Fazl, 10 May 1919

I went to the main part of the city today (22 April 1919). There I had the opportunity to meet and talk to an Arab who was well versed in Persian. We had a conversation for almost an hour. Drawing his attention towards the prophesies of the Holy Prophetsa, Iasked him, “Is it still not the time for the arrival of the Mahdi and the Promised Messiahas?”

I then explained to him almost every prophecy regarding the Messiah and Mahdi. Highlighting the root cause of the catastrophes and wars of the present age, I informed him about the claim of the Promised Messiahas.

Accompanying him were two persons belonging to Kurdistan. One of them raised the issue regarding the Mahdi’s reappearance that he would kill all the kuffar [infidels] and ensure the victory of Islam. I replied that he was completely mistaken because the Holy Quran openly stated:

لا اکراہ فی الدین

“There is no compulsion in religion.” So, taking this manifest guidance into account, I asked him how one could believe that the Mahdi would kill the kuffar. Moreover, I highlighted the fact that the Holy Prophetsa and his Companionsra never took up the sword to convert anybody to Islam by force. When the brutalities of the kuffar had exceeded certain bounds, the sword was drawn in defence.

Had the opponents refrained from carrying out extreme acts of cruelty, violence and inflicting pain on the Muslims, the Holy Prophetsa and his Companionsra would under no circumstances have drawn the sword. In fact, the principles of Islam are so firm, clear and easy to act on that every fortunate soul accepts them instantaneously.

Further, I laid emphasis on the fact that in the period of 1300 years after the exalted Seal of all Prophets, Muhammadsa, Islam was only able to spread in Arabia, Syria, Afghanistan and Egypt etc. while there are a number of other religious groups who are still thriving in most of these countries, and the majority of the world is deprived of this blessing [Islam]. I asked him, in his view, whether the coming Mahdi or Jesus, who would convert the entire world to Islam in a matter of days, would surpass the greatness of the Holy Prophetsa. (As Islam progressed gradually in the past, likewise it would progress in the latter days.)

I informed him about the progress and present condition of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, which was a source of delight for them all. Thereupon, the objector left the first allegation and presented another, saying that the Mahdi would appear soon but there was still time. I replied that in raising this allegation, he had made an even bigger mistake than the previous one because accepting his view, the denial of both the Holy Quran and the Hadith became inevitable.

It is stated in the Holy Quran that the appearance of a prophet is imperative before a universal catastrophe can occur. This is evident from the verse:

وَمَا کُنَّا مُعَذّبِیْنَ حَتّٰی نَبْعَثَ رَسُوْلًا

“We never punish until We have sent a Messenger.” I then said to the gentleman that he could not deny the fact that the world had witnessed a great catastrophe.

On the other hand, it is stated in a Hadith that a mujaddid [one who revives Islam] would appear at the turn of every century. This is clear from the Hadith:

إنّ اللّٰہ یَبعَث لہذہ الأمة علی رأس کل مِائة سَنةٍ من یجدّد لہا دینَہا

“Verily, Allah shall appoint for this Ummah, at the head of every century, a person to revive their faith for them.” (Sunan Abi Daud)

37 years of this century have passed, but so far, their Mahdi has not appeared. So, I explained, this would naturally cause frustration because this could be none other than Hazrat Ahmadas, the Promised Messiah and Imam Mahdi.

The one who was to appear had descended, I informed them. “The decision rests in your hands whether to accept him or not.”

Then, I reminded him that the one who does not recognise the Imam of the age dies the death of ignorance.

In addition, we had a comprehensive discussion about the Jamaat and on the life and death of Jesusas, which resulted in securing a positive impact on this person regarding the Jamaat.

He now asks for Arabic books of the Promised Messiahas. Thus far, I have duly conveyed the message of the Jamaat to the successor of Hazrat Sheikh Abdul QadirGilanirh, a bookseller Numan Afandi and a mualim [teacher of theology] who has been reading the books I have been sending for a while. Alongside them, I have conveyed the message of the Jamaat to several other individuals through Numan the bookseller.

I also had the chance to converse with a scholar belonging to the town of Imam Azam [“The Great Imam” – title of Hazrat Imam Abu Hanifarh], who was left speechless and unable to give a reply to my questions. He was briefed in detail about the Jamaat.

Similarly, there are a number of other individuals to whom I have conveyed the rightful message. Allah will grant the strength to whoever He pleases from among them to enter the Jamaat. The members of the Jamaat should pray that Allah the Almighty grants success because mere words, without the prayers of fellow members, are not enough. Surely, Allah the Almighty will fulfil our tasks.

I request members of the Jamaat to pray for this humble one because the intensity of the hot and cold weather is extreme. May Allah the Almighty grant me peace and safety through His blessing and benevolence and save me from pain and suffering.

Wassalam. Syed Fateh Ali Shah, Baghdad

(Translated by Al Hakam)

3-9 May

3 May 1935: On this day, Dr Sir Muhammad Iqbal, a renowned figure in the Indian subcontinent, made a demand of declaring Ahmadis a non-Muslim minority. The responsible Muslim press of that era found this demand objectionable and condemned the whole idea.

3 May 1938: A tourist from Iran, who was Zoroastrian by faith and agriculturist by profession, visited Qadian on this day. Mr Manochehar was so impressed by the spiritual aura of Qadian that he decided to enter the fold of the Jamaat.

3 May 1943: Hazrat Sheikh Mubarak Ahmad, a scholar and missionary of the Jamaat, completed the Swahili translation of the Holy Quran.

3 May 1946: The Ahmadiyya Jamaat in Sierra Leone conducted its first ever national Shura. 

3 May 1952: Hazrat Maulvi Abdullah Rehan Botalvira passed away. He entered the fold of Ahmadiyyat in 1901. He was the first amongst the Companionsra of the Promised Messiahas to be buried in the designated area for the Companionsra at Bahishti Maqbarah, Rabwah.

3 May 1955: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra was in Damascus. On this day, he announced a Nikah between a Syrian Ahmadi boy with an Ahmadi girl who belonged to the same country. It is also reported that on the same day, Huzoorra graciously blessed a question and answer session in Damascus.

4 May 1928: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra directed members of the Jamaat to devote their lives for the cause of Islam. More than 20 members, as a result, requested and presented themselves to Huzoorra to be considered for this blessed cause.

5 May 1948: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra directed Ahmadis while addressing the participants of Shura that they should come forward to reinhabit those localities vacated by the Ahmadi immigrants of Qadian post-partition. On this call, 35 devoted members departed for Qadian, amongst whom were 12 companions of the Promised Messiahas.

Hazrat Sardar Muhammad Yousuf ra

5 May 1952: Hazrat Sardar Muhammad Yousufra passed away. He accepted the Promised Messiahas in the early days of the Jamaat in 1889. He was the editor of Nur newspaper and had the blessed opportunity of translating the Holy Quran into Punjabi.

6 May 1911: Hazrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmadra graced a two-day convention organised by Anjuman Ahmadiyya Batala with his presence and two speeches.

6 May 1935: From Qadian, a team of three missionaries – namely Maulvi Ghulam Hussain Ayaz Sahib, Sufi Abdul Ghafur Sahib and Sufi Abdul Qadeer Nayaz Sahib – departed for Singapore, China and Japan. 

6 May 1949: Bashir Ahmad Orchard Sahib who was appointed as a missionary in Glasgow, Scotland conducted the first public meeting as an outreach effort for locals.

6 May 1955: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra delivered a Friday sermon in Damascus.

7 May 1933: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra stepped down from the presidency of the Kashmir Committee.

7 May 1955: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra arrived at Beirut, Lebanon and went to visit the ancient remains of the Baalbek.

7 May 1960: A prize and certificate distribution ceremony was held in Talim-ul-Islam College, Rabwah. The guest of honour was Justice MR Kayani, part of the top brass of Pakistan’s judiciary.

8 May 1955: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra departed from Beirut on an aeroplane. Passing over Athens and Rome, Huzoorra reached Geneva. He then left for Zurich and reached there on 9 May. A medical checkup was carried out in a hospital situated in Zurich on 10 May. Huzoorra met a homeopath specialist in Zurich on 12 May. On the same day, digging began for the foundations of a mosque in Holland.

8 May 1959: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra departed for Nakhla and stayed there until 16 September. During his stay, Huzoorra spent more than a month in reviewing the manuscript of Tafsir-e-Saghir for a third time.

8 May 1957: The foundation stone of Noor Mosque, Frankfurt was laid on this day.

9 May 1932: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra presided a session of the All India Kashmir Committee.

9 May 1935: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra travelled to Sindh for a period of ten days to survey lands there.

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Bulgaria and Humanity First collaborate in charity event

0

Zubair Khalil Khan

Director Projects in South East Europe

Humanity First Germany

Ahmadiyya Youngsters who have come all the way from the UK, France and Germany to study medicine in Bulgaria were lined up for a great cause to donate their blood for the people of Bulgaria. The following day, the same youth participated in organising a charity walk and football matches by Humanity First in collaboration with the municipality of Plovdiv, the second largest city in Bulgaria.

It was a great festive ceremony in the main Plovdiv Stadium. Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat missionary, Mr JawwadUddin Affan – currently stationed in Bulgaria – initially contacted the Social Welfare Department of the municipality of Plovidv, and on behalf of Humanity First, offered to donate medical equipment required by a school taking care of children with special needs.

Director of social welfare in the municipality, Ms Vaselina Boteva, along with head of the school Ms Bateba, the mayor and the deputy mayor of Plovdiv, appreciated the humanitarian gesture and wholeheartedly welcomed the idea.

13 April was agreed for the festive ceremony for handing over the donated equipment. Along with the donation, additional activities were also planned, which included  two charity runs (800-metre and 200-metre) by male and female adults as well as children.

An exhibition football match was also scheduled between students and professors. Ms Boteva, the director of social welfare of Plovdiv, remained the true spirit behind the success of this humanitarian event.

Weather forecasts in Bulgaria indicated heavy rain on 13 April, which created apprehensions for the success of the event. An urgent fax requesting the special prayers of Hazrat Amirul Momineenaa was sent to the UK. After two nights of heavy rainfall, on the morning prior to the start of Humanity First event, Allah showed His mercy and Kindness and clouds began to disperse. Throughout the entire programme, the sun continued to shine on us.

Amir Jamaat Germany Mr Abdullah Wagishauser, Director Marketing Humanity First Germany Mr Stefan Haerter and Director Projects for South East Europe Mr Zubair Khan travelled from Germany to be part of this festive event.

Almost 35 Ahmadi Students currently undergoing medical studies were the most visible group to donate blood and to facilitate organisation of this event under the leadership of Mr Haseeb, recently appointed as Qaid Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya Bulgaria.

In addition to Humanity First, many other humanitarian organisations including Red Cross also sponsored the event. Almost half a dozen stalls were erected to house the activities of different organisations.

Children with special needs were very happy to have received the equipment and one could see tears of joy and gratitude in their eyes. It was an historical event, the first of its kind in Bulgaria by Humanity First. Local officials expressed appreciation and recognition certificates were given to Humanity First with the hope that such activities continued in the future.

Norway Peace Symposium 2019

0

Tahir Mahmood Khan, Norway Correspondent

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat of Norway hosted a peace symposium on 9 April 2019 at the Bait-ul-Nasr mosque in Oslo, Norway. Around 200 guests from across the country attended this unique event, including politicians, ambassadors, faith and civic leaders as well as representatives from different faith communities.

Pic 2

The theme of this year’s peace symposium was Challenging Intolerance & Promoting Moderation.

Various dignitaries spoke at the event and shed light on the subject from their viewpoint. They were thankful to be invited to such a gathering, which they thought was a good initiative through which we could build strong relations with communities and attain peace in the world.

Dignitaries who spoke at the event included Mr Ed Brown (Secretary General for Stefanus Alliance International), Ms Chro Borhan (Dialogue Advisor for the Nansen Peace Centre), Mr Torstein Dale Akerlund (Director of Studies at the Bjorknes College), Mr Steinar Murud (Secretary General of Universal Peace Federation in Norway) and Mr John Roger Lund (Unit head of unit east at Oslo Police District).

Pic 1

The keynote address was delivered by Sir Iftikhar Ayaz Sahib. He conveyed the greetings of peace from Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa to the audience.

He then addressed the audience explaining the true teachings of Islam as taught by the Holy Prophet of Islam (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and revealed by God almighty in the Holy Quran. He emphasised that Islam, as a religion of peace, teaches no form of extremism or terrorism, and that the true Islam, as shown by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, is not to be feared. After dinner, guests were offered a guided tour of the mosque and the peace exhibition.

Whoever does not give up lying speech while observing Fasts

0

Hazrat Abu Huraira, Allah be pleased with him, narrates that the Holy Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

“Whoever does not give up forged speech and evil actions, Allah is not in need of his leaving his food and drink (i.e. Allah will not accept his fasting.)”

(Sahih Bukhari, Kitab Al-Saum)

28th Jalsa Salana Burkina Faso

1

Taimoor Ahmad

AMJ Burkina Faso

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Burkina Faso held its 28th Jalsa Salana on 29, 30 and 31 March 2019.

This year’s theme was “It is in the remembrance of Allah that hearts can find comfort” (Ch.13: V.29).

image1

The Jalsa was held at Bustan-e-Mahdi, located 20km from the capital Ouagadougou. The Jamaat of Burkina Faso was honoured to welcome Muft i-e-Silsila Mubashar Ahmad Kahlon Sahib as representative of Hazrat Amirul Momineenaa.

Along with Mubashar Kahlon Sahib, another special guest present at this Jalsa was Hafiz Ehsan Secundar Sahib, Missionary Incharge and Naib Amir Belgium. A delegation all the way from Ghana also took part in this event.

On Thursday, 28 March, Mubashar Kahlon Sahib along with Amir Sahib Burkina Faso, Mahmood Nasir Saqib Sahib, inspected the Jalsa site where they visited all the departments of Jalsa. Kahlon Sahib gave valuable suggestions and spoke briefly with the participants of Bobo Dioulasso region who came for the convention.

The opening session of Jalsa Salana commenced on Friday, 29 March at around 5pm after the flag hoisting ceremony. Amir Sahib Burkina Faso and Hafiz Ehsan Secundar Sahib hoisted respectively the national flag and Liwa-e-Ahmadiyyat. Hafiz Secundar Sahib led the opening session along with the inaugural speech.

image4

At the session, the Minister of State Mr Simeon Sawadogo, with three members of parliament and two governors came to visit the Jalsa. The delegation visited various exhibitions. Mr Sawadogo took great interest in the organisation of Jalsa. He took along with him literature and donated funds for Humanity First.

Saturday, 30 March, started with Tahajud and Fajr prayers and a dars on the importance of prayer. 

The second session began at 9am and was led by Amir Sahib Burkina Faso. Two speeches were presented: Who is Our God? and The Outset of Dissension in Islam.

The third session was led by one of the oldest members of Jamaat Burkina Faso, Alhaj Jibril Sahib. The Blessings of Khilafat and Our Responsibilities was the title of the third session’s speech.

After dinner on Saturday, the Ahmadi Muslims Student Federation in Burkina Faso (FEEMAB) organised a forum on Religion and Rationality. Many religious leaders presented their point of view on the matter. Hafiz Secundar Sahib spoke on behalf of the Jamaat. The forum was presided by the Chief of Election Commission Mr Newton Ahmed Barry. It was next followed by questions and answers.

On Sunday, aft er Fajr, a dars on the martyrs of Islam was presented.

The final session started at 9am chaired by Mubashar Ahmad Kahlon Sahib. Kahlon Sahib spoke about the remembrance of God and how we can achieve His help.

More than 9,200 participants took part in this year’s Jalsa Salana. May Allah bless all those who came for the Jalsa and the organisers of this event.

Even Those in the Company of the Righteous Are Safeguarded

rsz_hazrat_mirza_ghulam_ahmad_qadiani_as.jpg

People are victim to a host of afflictions, but the righteous are safeguarded. In fact, even those who are in their company find refuge. Hardship has no end. Even from within, man is plagued so severely by affliction that it is beyond imagination. Even if one takes the example of various illnesses, they are enough to result in countless other afflictions. But those who are within the fortress of righteousness are free from such affliction as distances one from God. However, those who are beyond its walls sit in a jungle teeming with ravenous beasts.

(Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas, Malfuzat, Vol. 1, pp.13-14)

Men of Excellence

0

Friday Sermon

5 April 2019

Delivered from Baitul Futuh Mosque

Men of Excellence

rsz_friday1.jpg

After reciting the Tashahud, Ta‘awuz, and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

The first of the Companionsra that I will mention today who took part in the Battle of Badr is Hazrat Khiraashra bin Sima Ansari. Hazrat Khiraashra belonged to the Banu Jusham, a branch of the Khazraj tribe. His mother’s name was Umme Habeeb. Abdur Rahman and Aisha were among the children of Hazrat Khiraashra. Hazrat Khiraashra participated in the battles of Badr and Uhud. He sustained ten injuries on the occasion of Uhud. He was among the skilled archers of the Holy Prophetsa.  (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 425, khiraash bin al-Sima, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, 1990)

Hazrat Khiraashra took Abul Aas, the son-in-law of the Holy Prophetsa, as captive and imprisoned him during the Battle of Badr. (Sirat ibn Hisham, vol. 1, p. 312, Isr Abi al-Aas ibn Rabi’ Zauj Zainab bint Rasulillah, Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 2009)

The second companion to be mentioned is Hazrat Ubaid bin Tayyihanra. The name of Hazrat Ubaid bin Tayyihanra is also reported as Ateek bin Tayyihan. His mother’s name was Laila bint Ateek. He was the brother of Hazrat Abul Haitham bin Tayyihan. He was among the confederates of Banu Abdil Ash‘al. He participated in the Bai‘at-e-Aqabah along with 70 Ansar. The Holy Prophetsa established a bond of brotherhood between him and Hazrat Masudra bin Rabee. He participated in the Battle of Badr along with his brother, Hazrat Abul Haithamra. He attained martyrdom during the Battle of Uhud. He was martyred by Ikrimah bin Abu Jahl. However, in another narration it states that he was martyred during the Battle of Siffin whilst fighting on the side of Hazrat Alira. There exists a difference of opinion regarding this matter. In any case, the common factor in both of the narrations is that he attained the status of martyrdom. From among his children, we particularly find mention of Hazrat Ubaidullahra and Hazrat Abbadra. According to the account of Tabari, Hazrat Abbadra also participated in the Battle of Badr, and with regard to Hazrat Ubaidullahra it states that he was martyred during the Battle of Yamama. (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, pp. 342-343, Abul Haitham bin al-Tayyihan, Ubaid bin al-Tayyihan, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, 1990) (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 3, p. 153, Abbad bin Ubaid, p. 521, Ubaidullah bin Ubaid bin al-Tayyihan, p. 529, Ubaid bin al-Tayyihan, Dar-ul-Kutub Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2003)

The next companion is Hazrat Abu Hannah Malik bin Amrra. Abu Hannah was his title, while his actual name was Malik bin Amr. Muhammad bin Umar Waqidi has counted him among those who took part in the Battle of Badr. There are varying opinions regarding his name. In some narrations, his name is reported as Aamir and also Thabit bin Numan. His title is also reported as Abu Habbah and Abu Hayyah. However, Muhammad bin Umar Waqidi states that two people are reported to have the title of Abu Habbah; one is Abu Habbah bin Ghazziyyah bin Amr and the other is Abu Habbah bin Abd Amr al-Ma‘azani. Neither of the two participated in the Battle of Badr. None of the participants of the Battle of Badr bore the title of “Abu Habbah”. An individual, who participated in the Battle of Badr did however bear the title of “Abu Hannah”. Due to this, he emphasises that his title was indeed Abu Hannah. (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 365, Abul Hannah, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, 1990) (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 6, p. 63, Abu Habbah al-Ansari, Dar-ul-Kutub Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2003)

The next companion to be mentioned is Hazrat Abdullahra bin Zaid bin Tha‘labahra. He was known as Abdullah Bin Zaid Ansari and his title was Abu Muhammad. His father’s name was Hazrat Zaidra Bin Tha’labah, who was also a companion of the Holy Prophetsa. He belonged to the tribe Banu Jusham from the branch of Khazraj. He participated in the Bai‘at at Aqabah along with 70 Ansar. He participated in the battles of Badr, Uhud, Khandaq and all other battles along with the Holy Prophetsa. During the conquest of Mecca, he was carrying the flag of Banu Harith bin Khazraj. Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra was proficient in writing Arabic prior to his acceptance of Islam. This was at a time when writing was very uncommon among the Arabs and there were only a few people who knew how to write.

The children of Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra remained in Medina. One of his sons was called Muhammad, who was born to him from his wife, Sa‘dah bint Kulaib. One of his daughters was Umm-e-Humaid, whose mother was from Yemen.

His brother, Hurais bin Zahid, was amongst the Companions of Badr. (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 3, p. 248, Abdullah bin Zaid al-Ansari, Dar-ul-Kutub Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2003) (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, pp. 405-406, Abdullah bin Zaid Huraith bin Zaid, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, 1990)

The name of one of his sisters was Quraibah bint Zaid and she was also counted amongst the female companions. (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 8, pp. 271-272, Qareebatu bint Zaid, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, 1990)

Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra is that very companion, who was taught the words of the Azan [Islamic call to prayer] in a dream. He informed the Holy Prophetsa about this, upon which the Holy Prophetsa instructed Hazrat Bilalra to call the Azan according to the words Hazrat Abdullahra saw in the dream. This incident occurred in the first year of Hijra, after the Holy Prophetsa had constructed Masjid Nabawi. (Al-Isti’ab fi Ma’rifatis Sahaba, Vol. 3, p. 913, Abdullah bin Zaid, Dar-ul-Jeel, Beirut, 1992)

Some of the details are as follows. Hazrat Abu Umair bin Anas Ansarira was from among the Ansar. He narrates on the authority of his paternal uncles that they said that the Holy Prophetsa deliberated as to how to gather Muslims for prayer. It was suggested to him that a flag should be hoisted at the time for prayer and when people observed it, they would inform each other. However, the Holy Prophetsa did not approve of this suggestion. The narrator says that the blowing of a horn was suggested to the Holy Prophetsa, that is to adopt the method of the Jews by blowing loudly into a horn. However, the Holy Prophetsa disliked adopting this method of the Jews as well. The narrator further says that the use of a bell was mentioned to the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa said that this was the method of the Christians. Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra returned and felt anxious due to the concerns of the Holy Prophetsa. He offered supplications and says that he was subsequently shown the words of the Azan in a dream.

Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra continues to narrate that he saw a person in a dream, who was holding a bell in his hand. He enquired, “O servant of God! Are you going to sell this?” The person replied, “What are you going to do with it?” I said, “We will use it to call people towards prayer.” He replied, “Shall I tell you of something that is better than this?” I said, “why not!” Hazrat Abdullah says that he then repeated the words of the Azan:

اَللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ اللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ۔ اَللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ اللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ۔ أَشْھَدُ أَنْ لَّا اِلٰہَ اِلَّااللّٰہُ۔ أَشْھَدُ أَنْ لَّا اِلٰہَ اِلَّااللّٰہُ۔ أَشْھَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَّسُوْلُ اللّٰہِ۔ أَشْھَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَّسُوْلُ اللّٰہِ۔ حَيَّ عَلَی الصَّلَاۃِ۔ حَيَّ عَلَی الصَّلَاۃِ۔ حَيَّ عَلَی الْفَلَاحِ۔ حَيَّ عَلَی الْفَلَاحِ۔ اَللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ اللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ۔ لَآ اِلٰہَ اِلَّااللّٰہُ

I will also read its translation as it will prove beneficial for children as well as for Muslim converts. We hear the Azan daily, however, I have observed that some people are not even aware of its translation. The translation is:

“Allah is the Greatest; Allah is the Greatest (to be repeated twice). I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah (to be repeated twice). I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messengersa of Allah (also to be repeated twice). Come to prayer; come to prayer. Come to success; come to success. Allah is the Greatest (again to be repeated twice). There is none worthy of worship except Allah.”

He then continues to narrate that after repeating these words, this individual distanced himself somewhat from him and then said, “When you are standing, ready to pray, you should say the following. He then repeated the words of the takbir [iqamah]:

اَللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ اللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ۔ أَشْھَدُ أَنْ لَّا إِلٰہَ إِلَّااللّٰہُ۔ أَشْھَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَّسُوْلُ اللّٰہِ۔ حَيَّ عَلَی الصَّلَاۃِ۔ حَيَّ عَلَی الْفَلَاحِ۔ قَدْ قَامَتِ الصَّلَاۃُ۔ قَدْ قَامَتِ الصَّلَاۃُ۔ اَللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ اللّٰہُ أَکْبَرُ۔ لَآ اِلٰہَ اِلَّا اللّٰہُ

These are the same words of the Azan with the addition of the words, “Qad qamat-is-Salah” i.e. “the prayer has begun; prayer has begun”. Following this, the same words of “Allah is the Greatest; Allah is the Greatest” are repeated.

Hazrat Abdullahra further says, “The next morning, I presented myself before the Holy Prophetsa and informed him of my dream. The Holy Prophetsa said, ‘If Allah wills, this is a true dream. Stand with Bilal and tell him what you saw, so that he may call the Azan according to those words, as his voice is louder than yours.’ Hence, I stood with Bilal and continued to tell him the words and he continued to call the Azan accordingly.”

The narrator further states, “Hazrat Umar bin Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, was in his home when he heard the Azan. He left his home, dragging along his cloth which he used as an outer garment and said, ‘O prophetsa of Allah! I swear by Him, Who has sent you with the truth! I saw exactly what he saw in his dream.’ Hearing this, the Holy Prophetsa said, ‘All praise belongs to Allah the Exalted.’” (Sunan Abi Daud, Kitab al-Salat, Bab Bad’ul Azan, Hadith 498, Bab Kaifal Azan, Hadith 499)

In another narration, it states that the Holy Prophetsa said, “To Allah belongs all praise; this indeed is the truth.” (Jami’ al-Tirmidhi, Kitabus Salat, Bab ma Jaa’a fi Bad’il Azan, Hadith 189)

Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra has written further details to this account in Sirat Khatamun-Nabiyyin, using various sources of Islamic history. He writes: 

“Until now there was no arrangement for a call to Salat, or Azan etc. The Companions would generally congregate in the mosque at the approximate time themselves. These state of affairs, however, were not satisfactory. Upon the construction of Masjid-e-Nabawi, the question as to how Muslims would be congregated at the appropriate time was felt even more. One Companion proposed the use of a bell, like the Christians. Someone proposed the use of a trumpet, like the Jews; and others made other suggestions. However, Hazrat Umarra proposed that an individual be appointed to announce that it was time for Salat at the appointed time. The Holy Prophetsa approved this proposal, and appointed Hazrat Bilalra to perform this duty (this was prior to the formal establishment of the Azan). As such, after this, when the time for Salat would arrive, Hazrat Bilalra would announce in a loud voice:

اَلصَّلَاۃُ جَامِعَۃٌ

and people would congregate for the Salat. As a matter of fact, the very same call would be made if it was necessary to congregate the Muslims in the mosque for a purpose other than the Salat as well. Sometime afterwards, the words of the current Azan were taught to a Companion named Abdullah bin Zaid Ansarira, in a dream. He presented himself before the Holy Prophetsa and mentioned this dream saying, ‘I saw an individual in my dream call out such and such words as if calling the Azan.’ The Holy Prophetsa said, ‘This dream is from Allah,’ and instructed ‘Abdullahra to teach these words to Bilalra. A strange coincidence was that when Bilalra called out the Azan in these words for the very first time, upon hearing them, Hazrat Umarra made haste to the Holy Prophetsa and said, ‘O Messenger of Allah! Today, the words in which Bilalra called out the Azan were exactly those which I also saw in my dream.’  In one narration it has also been related that when the Holy Prophetsa heard these words of the Azan, he said, ‘Revelation has already been sent down as such.’” (Sirat Khatamun-Nabiyyin, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra, pp. 271-272)

Bashir bin Muhammad relates from his father:

“Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra, (i.e. the companion who saw a dream about the Azan), offered his entire wealth in charity and nothing remained with him. The wealth they had was their only means of provisions for him and his son. When Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra handed everything to the Holy Prophetsa, his father approached the Holy Prophetsa and requested: ‘O Messengersa of Allah! Abdullah bin Zaidra has offered his wealth towards charity. However, that wealth was serving as a means of our provisions.’ When the Holy Prophetsa heard this, he called for Abdullah bin Zaidra and stated, ‘Allah has accepted the charity that you offered. However, return this to your parents as an endowment.’” Thus, his father states that they acquired this wealth as an inheritance and their future generations were able obtain a share from it later. (Ma‘rifatis Sahaba Li Abi Na’eem al-Asbahani, Vol. 3, p. 149, Abdullah bin Zaid…, Hadith 4172, Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, 2002)

On one occasion, the Holy Prophetsa bestowed his nails to Hazrat Abdullahra bin Zaid as a blessed gift. The details of this incident are that Muhammad, the son of Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra narrates that on the occasion of Hajjat ul Wida, his father was with the Holy Prophetsa in the plain of Mina at the Manhar, i.e. the place where the sacrifices are offered. There was another person from the Ansar who was present there as well. When the Holy Prophetsa distributed the sacrificed animals, Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra and his Ansari companion did not receive any share of the sacrifice. Thereafter, the Holy Prophetsa had his hair cut and placed his hair on a piece of cloth and distributed this among the people. Then he had his nails cut and granted them to Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra and his Ansari companion. (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 406, Abdullah bin Zaid, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilimiyya, Beirut, 1990)

Hazrat Aishara narrates, “A person came to the Holy Prophetsa and requested, ‘O Messenger of Allah! By God, you are undoubtedly more beloved to me than my own self, my family and my children. I was at home thinking about you, and I could not hold myself back to the point that I just had to come and meet you and now I am looking at you. When I thought about the idea of you and I passing away, I realised that after entering paradise, you shall be exalted along with other prophets. So I became afraid that when I enter paradise, I will not be able to find you.’ The Holy Prophetsa did not respond to this person until the angel Gabriel descended with the revelation of the following verse: 

وَ مَنۡ یُّطِعِ اللّٰہَ وَ الرَّسُوۡلَ فَاُولٰٓئِکَ مَعَ الَّذِیۡنَ اَنۡعَمَ اللّٰہُ عَلَیۡہِمۡ مِّنَ النَّبِیّٖنَ وَ الصِّدِّیۡقِیۡنَ وَ الشُّہَدَآءِ وَ الصّٰلِحِیۡنَ

‘And whoso obeys Allah and this Messenger of His shall be among those on whom Allah has bestowed His blessings, namely, the Prophets, the Truthful, the Martyrs, and the Righteous. And excellent companions are these.’” (Surah al-Nisa, Ch.4: V.70) (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Vol. 2, p. 311, al-Nisa: 69, Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1998)

We present this verse to support the argument that one can attain the status of a non-law bearing prophet through one’s devotion and subservience to the Holy Prophetsa. And through one’s complete obedience to the Holy Prophetsa, one can progress from being at the stage of righteousness to the status of a prophet. In any case, the status of a non-law bearing prophet, which can only be achieved through one’s subservience to the Holy Prophetsa, is indeed of a lofty status and God Almighty can grant this status to whomsoever He wills. Moreover, in relation to the Promised Messiah, the Holy Prophetsa himself has used the word Nabiullah i.e. that he would be a prophet of God. (Sahih Muslim, Kitabul Fitan Wa Ashraat al-Saa‘ah, Bab Dhikr al-Dajjal Wa Sifatihi Wa ma Ma’ahu, Hadith 2937)

For this reason, we accept the Promised Messiahas as a non-law bearing prophet who came in the complete servitude of the Holy Prophetsa. This does not cause any blemish on the finality of his prophethood. Rather it elevates his status further, making the blessing of prophethood attainable, but only through the servitude of the Holy Prophetsa. We are not alone in holding this interpretation; previous scholars have presented it as well. For instance, Imam Raghib has also stated that a non-law bearing prophet can come after the Holy Prophetsa but only through complete obedience to him. (Tafsir Al-Bahrul Muheet, Vol. 3, p. 299, Al-Nisa:69, Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2010)

However, I have mentioned this as an additional point in light of this verse so that the matter is properly clarified.

Allama Zurqani writes that the aforementioned incident is found in various books of Quranic commentaries and records the name of Hazrat Thobanra, who was a servant of the Holy Prophetsa. Whereas in Tafsir Yanbu’ Al Hayaat, Muqatil bin Sulaiman relates that the aforementioned incident was in relation to Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaid Al Ansarira – i.e. the companion who had seen the wordsof theAzan in his dream. 

However, Allama Zurqani writes that if this is the case, it is likely that both may have mentioned it to the Holy Prophetsa upon which this Quranic verse was revealed. This particular narration has been linked to many companions of the Holy Prophet. (Sharh Zurqani Alaa al-Mawahib al-Deeniyyah, Vol. 12, pp. 417-418, Khatimah, Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1996)

Aside from the aforementioned incident, various commentaries have also mentioned Hazrat Thoban’sra incident and what he said to the Holy Prophetsa. Its detail are as follows:

Hazrat Thobanra had intense love for the Holy Prophetsa and could not bear to be away from him for too long. One day when he presented himself before the Holy Prophetsa, he seemed to be greatly perturbed and looked to be in a state of great sorrow. The Holy Prophetsa enquired of the cause of why he was overcome with such a state. Hazrat Thobanra replied that he suffered from neither ailment nor disease except that he had not been able to see the Holy Prophetsa. Meaning, the only reason for this downed and distressed expression was the result of not having seen the Holy Prophetsa for such a long time.

He states:

“I remained in this state until I finally met you. Similarly, when I thought of the Day of Judgment, I again was overcome with a state of fear as I realised I would not be in your blessed presence for you would have been exalted to a higher station in paradise with the other prophets. Then, even if I am granted entry into paradise, my status would be far too insignificant to yours; and if I am not granted entry, I would forever be left bereft of seeing you.” (Tafsir al-Baghwi, Vol. 1, p. 450, Al-Nisa:69, Idarah Ta’leefaat Ashrafiyyah, Multan, Pakistan, 1424A.H.)

Allama Zurqani writes that Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra was once working in his garden. (The account of Hazrat Abdullahra continues) and it states that his son came, informing him of the demise of the Holy Prophetsa. Upon this he said:

اللّٰھُمَّ اَذْھِبْ بَصَرِیْ حَتّٰی لَا اَرٰی بَعْدَ حَبِیْبِیْ مُحَمَّدً اَحَدًا

That is, “O Allah take from me my sight so that after the departure of my beloved Muhammadsa, I may not have to see another individual again.”

It is written in the commentary of Zurqani that after this incident, his eyesight gradually weakened until he became completely lost his sight. (Sharh Zurqani Alaa al-Mawahib al-Deeniyyah, Vol. 9, pp. 84-85, Fi Wujoob Mahabbatihi Wa Ittiba’ Sunnatihi, Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1996)

There is a difference in opinion with regard to the demise of Hazrat Abdullah bin Zaidra. Some have written that he passed away after the Battle of Uhud. However, majority have written that he took part in all battles alongside the Holy Prophetsa and passed away much later in the year 32 AH in Medina, during the caliphate of Hazrat Usmanra. Likewise, the incident regarding the loss of his eyesight – if accepted to be accurate – also points to his passing away in the time of Hazrat Usmanra at the age of 64. His funeral prayer was led by Hazrat Usmanra. (Al-Mustadrak Ala Al-Sahihain Lil-Hakim, Vol. 5, p. 266, Kitab al-Fara’idh, Hadith 8187, Dar-ul-Fikr, 2001) (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 406, Abdullah bin Zaid, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilimiyya, Beirut, 1990)

Then, the next companion is Hazrat Muazra bin Amr bin Jamooh. He belonged to a branch of the Banu Khazraj called Banu Salma. He participated in the Second Bai‘at at Aqabah as well as the battles of Badr and Uhud. His father, Hazrat Amrra bin Jamooh, was a companion of the Holy Prophetsa who was martyred in the Battle of Uhud. His mother’s name was Hind bint Amr. According to Musa bin Uqbah Abu Ma‘shar and Muhammad bin Amr Waqidi, his brother, Muawwiz bin Amr, also partook in the Battle of Badr. His wife’s name was Subaitah bint Amr who belonged to Banu Sa‘idah, a branch of the Banu Khazraj tribe. He had one son with her named Abdullah and a daughter named Ummamah. (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, pp. 426-427, Mu’adh bin Amr, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilimiyya, Beirut, 1990) (Al-Siratun Nabawiyyah Li Ibn Kathir, p. 197, Fasl fi Ruju al-Ansar Lailat al-Aqabah al-Thania ilaa al-Medina, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilimiyya, Beirut, 2005)

Hazrat Muazra participated in the second Bai‘at at Aqabah, but his father, Amr bin Jamooh, remained firm upon his idolatrous beliefs. The story of the conversion of Hazrat Muaz’s father is recorded in Sirat Ibn Hisham. About a year ago, I mentioned this incident in relation to his account. It states that when those who had participated in the second Bai‘at at Aqabah returned to Medina, they actively spread the message of Islam. There were still some elders among their people who remained firm on their polytheistic beliefs. Among these was also Amr bin Jamooh. His son, Hazrat Muaz bin Amr had participated in the second Bai‘at at Aqabah and had pledged allegiance on this occasion to the Holy Prophetsa

Amr bin Jamooh was among the chieftains of the Banu Salma tribe and was one of their elders as well. He kept an idol carved from wood in his house, as was the practice of elders in those days. This idol was called Manat, and they would show respect to it and revere it. When some young men from the Banu Salma tribe accepted Islam, among whom was also Hazrat Muaz bin Jabl and the son of Amr bin Jamooh, i.e. Hazrat Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh (who was also among this group of youth who had converted at the second Bai’at at ‘Aqabah).

One night, these young men entered into his idol-chamber and brought back the idol, and laid it down face-first in a pit that was dug out for the Banu Salma tribe to throw their waste. The next morning, when Amr woke up, he cursed those who had taken away their idol in the night and shown enmity towards it. He then went in search of it and when he found it, he washed and cleaned it, saying, “I swear to god, if I find out who has done this to you, I will certainly ruin him.” And when the night fell and Amr would be asleep, his son would repeat the act. When morning came, Amr bin Jamooh again did the same thing, undertook the same effort to look for it and washed it, etc.

When several nights passed like this, Amr bin Jamooh removed the idol from where it had been thrown, washed it and cleaned it. Then he brought his sword and hung it around its neck, saying, “By God, I don’t know who is doing this to you. So if you have any power at all, here is a sword I leave with you. Use it to stop him.” And he placed the sword by the idol. When the sun set and Amr went to sleep, the same youth, among whom was also his son, did the same thing to the idol. Removing the sword from around its neck, they tied the idol to a dead dog with a rope, casting it into an old well of the Banu Salma tribe which was used to dispose of waste. When Amr bin Jamooh awoke in the morning and didn’t find the idol where he had left it, he went out in search of it, until he found it lying face-first tied to a dead dog in the well.    

When he witnessed this sight, the truth of his erred ways opened up to him. The Muslims of his tribe also introduced him to the teachings of Islam, and by Allah’s mercy, he became a Muslim. (Al-Siratun Nabawiyyah Li Ibn Hisham, pp. 207-208, Sanam Amr bin al-Jamooh, Dar-ul-Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 2009)

This incident has been recorded in the Sirat of Ibn Hisham, and it also states that he said, “This idol couldn’t even do anything with a sword. What benefit could there possibly be in worshiping such a god.”

Hazrat Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh took part in the killing of Abu Jahl. It is written in Sahih Bukhari, “Salih bin Ibrahim narrates on the authority of his grandfather, Abdur Rahman bin Auf that he stated: ‘I was standing in the rows for battle on the day of Badr. When I looked to my right and left, I saw two Ansari youths standing on either side of me.  At that moment, I wished that I was in between two people who were more mature and stronger. One of the youths nudged my hand and asked: “O my uncle! Do you recognise Abu Jahl?” to which I said, indeed I recognise him, why is it that you ask?” The youth replied: “I heard that he would use foul language for the Holy Prophetsa. I swear by the One in Who’s hands is my life, if I see him I will not let him out of my sight until the one who’s destined to die from among us perishes.” I was astonished by this reply. Then the other youth also tapped my hand and made the same enquiry. A short while passed when I saw Abu Jahl walking between the ranks. I said to the youths that there was the one about whom they enquired. Immediately the two youths drew their swords and cutting the ranks pounced on Abu Jahl and killed him. They then returned to inform the Holy Prophetsa of the news. The Holy Prophetsa asked which one from among them killed him? They both laid claim to the kill. The Holy Prophetsa then asked whether they had wiped their swords after they had killed him? They replied in the negative. The Holy Prophetsa then inspected their swords and said that both of them had in fact killed him. The Holy Prophetsa then said that the spoils of war would be given to Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh. Both youth had the same name; one was Muaz bin Afraa and the other was Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh.’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab Fardil Khumus, Bab Man Lam Yakhmus al-Aslab, Hadith 3141)

This incident regarding Abu Jahl has been narrated before in the earlier sermons, in which it was mentioned that it was Muaz and Muawwiz. Consequently, this could lead to doubt as the latter refers to someone else. With regard to the killing of Abu Jahl, from various books of Hadith – such as the narration of Bukhari as mentioned earlier – as well as from books of history, we learn that Hazrat Muaz bin Amr bin Jamoohra and Hazrat Muaz bin Afraara killed Abu Jahl, and Hazrat Abdullah bin Masudra severed the head of Abu Jahl. In another narration, the names of Muaz and Muawwiz are mentioned. Nonetheless, in Bukhari there is another narration in which it is stated that Abu Jahl was killed by the two sons of Afrah, Muaz and Muawwiz, and later Hazrat Abdullah bin Masudra dealt the final blow to Abu Jahl. In the narration of Bukhari, the details are as follows:

“Hazrat Anasra narrates that on the day of the Battle of Badr, the Holy Prophetsa said, ‘Who will go to see the outcome of Abu Jahl?’ Hazrat Ibn Masud went and saw that the two sons of Afraa, Muaz and Muawwiz had attacked him with their swords to the extent that he was on the brink of death. Ibn Masud enquired of him: ‘Are you Abu Jahl?’ and took hold of his beard. Abu Jahl then said: ‘Have you ever killed a person of greater rank?’ or perhaps he said: ‘Is there any person greater than I, who is killed at the hands of his own people?’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitabul Maghazi, Bab Qatl Abi Jahl, Hadith 3962)

Both of these narrations are found in Bukhari. In one narration both of them are named as Muaz, and in the other incident they are recorded as Muaz and Muawwiz. Similarly, in one of the narrations they are stated as two brothers, but in the other narration the two youths are not related. With regard to how one can reconcile both of these narrations in relation to the killing of Abu Jahl, Hazrat Syed Zainul Abideen Waliullah Shah Sahibra writes:

“According to some narrations, the two sons of Afraa, Muaz and Muawwiz, attacked Abu Jahl to the extent that he was on the brink of death. After this Hazrat Abdullah bin Masud severed his head. Imam Ibn Hajr has stated, ‘After Muaz bin Amr and Muaz bin Afraa attacked Abu Jahl, Muawwiz must have attacked him as well.’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 5, p. 491, Hashiyah, Urdu Tarjumah, Nazarat Isha’at, Rabwah)

For this reason, in one of the narrations there is mention of two brothers and in other narration, there is mention of two different youths who are not related.

In the commentary of Fath-ul-Bari, it is written that perhaps all three of them attacked Abu Jahl.

Allama Badruddin Aini writes regarding the death of Abu Jahl:

“Abu Jahl was killed by Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh, Muaz bin Afrah and Hazrat Abdullah bin Masud. Hazrat Abdullah bin Masudra was the one who then brought the severed head and presented it to the Holy Prophetsa.” (Umdatul Qari, Vol. 17, p. 120, Dar Ihyaa al-Turath al-Arabi, Beirut, 2003)

He further writes:

“In Sahih Muslim it is written that Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh and Muaz bin Afraa killed Abu Jahl. Muaz bin Afraa’s father was Harith bin Rifa‘ah and his mother’s name was Afraa, who was the daughter of Ubaid bin Tha‘labah Najjaria.”

Similarly, in Bukhari, Kitabul Jihad, Bab Man Lam Yukhamis Al-Aslaab, it is written, “Hazrat Muaz bin Amr cut the leg of Abu Jahl, as a result of which he fell down. Subsequently, Muawwiz also launched an attack and left him on the ground. When Abu Jahl had little life left in him, Hazrat Abdullah bin Masud dealt him the final blow, severing his head.”

He further writes:

“If one questions the reason why all these events needed to be mentioned together, then I would say that perhaps they all had a hand in the killing of Abu Jahl.” (Umdatul Qari, Vol. 17, pp. 121-122, Dar Ihyaa al-Turath al-Arabi, Beirut, 2003)

According to one narration of Zurqani, when Hazrat Abdullah bin Masud found Abu Jahl, he was on the brink of death. Hazrat Abdullah bin Masud put his leg on Abu Jahl’s neck and said: “O enemy of God! God Almighty has humiliated you!” Abu Jahl replied arrogantly: “I have not been humiliated! Have you ever killed a person greater than myself?” Meaning that he did not feel any humiliation and then asked who had been victorious in the battle. Hazrat Abdullah bin Masud replied that God and His Messengersa were victorious.

According to another narration, it is stated that Abu Jahl said:

“I was his [i.e. Muhammad’ssa] enemy all his life, and even today, my enmity has not subsided in the slightest.” Hazrat Abdullah bin Masud then severed his head and brought it to the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa said, “Just as I am the most beloved and revered of God from among all the prophets and my people are the most honourable from all other nations, similarly, Abu Jahl is the most severe and violent Pharaoh of all those who had pharaoh like traits.” For this reason, it is stated in the Holy Quran:

حَتّٰۤی اِذَاۤ اَدۡرَکَہُ الۡغَرَقُ ۙ قَالَ اٰمَنۡتُ اَنَّہٗ لَاۤ اِلٰہَ اِلَّا الَّذِیۡۤ اٰمَنَتۡ بِہٖ بَنُوۡۤا اِسۡرَآءِیۡلَ

Meaning, “Till, when the calamity of drowning overtook him, he said, ‘I believe that there is no God but He in Whom the children of Israel believe”’ (Surah Yunus, Ch.10: V.91)

Thus, the Pharaoh of that era was the gravest in terms of enmity and disbelief, and this is evident from the last words of Abu Jahl.

Aside from this, in another narration it is stated that when the Holy Prophetsa received news of the death of Abu Jahl and saw his head, he said:

اَللّٰہُ الَّذِیْ لَآاِلٰہَ اِلَّا ھُوَ

 “There is no God but Allah,”

Similarly, the Holy Prophetsa repeated three times:

اَلْحَمْدُ لِلّٰہِ الَّذِیْ أَعَزّ الْاِسْلَامَ وَأَھْلَہٗ

 “All Praise is due to Allah, Who honoured Islam and its followers.” Another narration states that the Holy Prophetsa said, “Every nation has a Pharoah. In this era, the pharaoh was Abu Jahl, who God Almighty destroyed in a terrible manner.” (Sharh Zurqani Alaa al-Mawahib al-Deeniyyah, Vol. 2, pp. 297-298, Darul Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1996)

Hazrat Muaz bin Amr bin Jamoohra passed away during the Caliphate of Hazrat Usmanra. (Al-Isaba Fi Tameez Al-Sahaba, Vol. 6, p. 114, Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, 1995)

Khalifa bin Khiyaat states, “On the day of the Battle of Badr, Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh suffered a wound as a result of which he remained unwell until the caliphate of Hazrat Uthmanra. He passed away in Medina. Hazrat Usmanra led his funeral prayer and buried him in Jannatul Baqi.

Hazrat Abu Hurairahra narrates that the Holy Prophetsa said, “Muaz bin Amr bin Jamooh was an exceptional individual.” (Al-Mustadrak Ala Al-Sahihain Lil-Hakim, Vol. 4, pp. 140-141, Dhikr Manaqib Mu’adh bin Amr bin al-Jamooh, Hadith 5895-5897, Dar-ul-Fikr, Beirut, 2002)

May God Almighty shower His endless mercy on all those who immersed themselves in the love of God and His beloved, and attained their pleasure.

After the Friday prayers, I will lead a funeral prayer in absentia of respected Malik Sultan Harun Khan Sahib, who passed away on 27 March in Islamabad. Inna Lillah Wa Inna Ilahi Rajioon.

His eldest son is the son-in-law of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh, married to his youngest daughter. Malik Sultan Harun Sahib was a born Ahmadi and his father’s name was Col Malik Sultan Muhammad Khan Sahib, who did Bai‘at at the hand of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra in 1923 at the age of 23. At the time, he was the only Ahmadi in his family. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra himself arranged his marriage with respected Aishah Siddiqa Sahiba, daughter of Hazrat Chaudhry Fateh Muhammad Siyal Sahib.

He belonged to a very honourable and noble family of the Punjab. Malik Amir Muhammad Khan, who was the Governor of West Pakistan and was famously known by the title of Nawab Kalabagh, was the paternal cousin of Malik Sultan Harun Khan Sahib’s father, i.e. Col Malik Sultan Muhammad Sahib. His grandfather was Malik Sultan Surakh Ruh Khan and in those days, India and Pakistan were a colony of the British Empire, however, owing to his status of Nawab, he was held in high regard by them. Four years after the Bai‘at of his son, Malik Sultan Muhammad Khan Sahib also had the honour of accepting Ahmadiyyat. Despite heavily immersed in worldly endeavours, he had an inclination towards faith and due to this, God Almighty blessed him with the opportunity to accept Ahmadiyyat.

Sultan Harun Khan Sahib was married to Sabiha Hamid Sahiba, daughter of Chaudhry Abdul Hameed Sahib, who was a General Manager at WAPDA. Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh led their Nikah and during the Nikah sermon, regarding Chaudhry Fateh Muhammad Siyal Sahib who was a pioneer missionary in England, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh stated: “Chaudhry Fateh Muhammad Siyal was a well-respected elder of mine, and I am indeed indebted to him for his kindness.” Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh further stated, “At a young age, while still inexperienced, he would take me along with him and provided me with many opportunities to enhance my experience. My affinity for those living in rural areas which was concealed in my heart was able to be manifested through the opportunities I received by staying with Chaudhry Fateh Muhammad Siyal.”

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh further stated, “Even now, when a simple villager meets me, I enjoy the frank and straightforward conversation far greater than if I were to have a conversation with someone from the city. This is because those living in the cities have a habit of employing many formalities in their style of speech and thus owing to this habit of theirs, I also naturally start conversing with them in a similar way.”

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh further states, “Nevertheless, today I shall lead the Nikah ceremony of the grandson of this benevolent elder of mine, Malik Sultan Harun Khan, son of Col Sultan Muhammad Khan.”

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh further stated, “Members should pray that just as our elders selflessly and with great sincerity served the religion of God, may this same passion to serve the faith and the spirit of sacrifice continue extraordinarily in their progeny.” (Khutbat-e-Nasir, Vol. 10, pp. 437-440)

By mentioning this again today at the occasion of his funeral, I pray that may God Almighty enable Malik Harun Sahib’s progeny to not only maintain a relationship with Ahmadiyyat and Khilafat, but further strengthen it. The deceased has three sons and three daughters, and as I mentioned his eldest son, Sultan Muhammad Khan is the son-in-law of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh.

Malik Harun Sahib took great care of the poor and needy of the local area. In particular, he treated those women who had genuine needs with great kindness. The women also mentioned that while Malik Sahib was alive, they felt very safe in their area, but now, after his demise, they have become more fearful. There is a lot of hostility and enmity in the area of Attock and the poor are neglected of their rights, but despite being a landowner and an influential individual of the area, he took great care of the poor. Sultan Harun Khan Sahib’s sister, Rashida Siyal Sahiba, who resides in Canada says, “My brother, Sultan Harun Khan Sahib, possessed many qualities. He had a great sense of honour for Ahmadiyyat and was willing to sacrifice his life for the institution of Khilafat. He was a truly loyal to his friends and courageous in the face of the enemy. He supported the poor and needy.” She further states, “Once, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh wrote a letter to me stating, ‘Your father, Col Sultan Muhammad Khan Sahib, was like an unsheathed sword for Ahmadiyyat, and your brothers share the same quality.’”

Once, there was a lot of hostility in that area. On the one hand, there would be a lot of enmity over land and wealth, but moreover, they had to endure far greater hostility owing to them being Ahmadi. She writes, “Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh said, ‘Bullets will be fired but they will pass over your head and Insha-Allah nothing will happen to you.’” She writes, “They witnessed how the words of the third Khalifa proved to be true. In 1977, an attempt was made to assassinate Malik Sultan Harun Sahib at the Fatah Jang Police Station and shots were fired at him, but the bullets passed just over the hair of his head and he did not even sustain a scratch. Thus, God Almighty protected him in a miraculous manner. He was extremely generous towards the poor and greatly supported those who were helpless and weak.” 

His elder brother, Malik Sultan Rashid Khan Sahib, states, “After the demise of our father, Malik Sultan Harun Sahib was the head of our family. Despite all my efforts, he would always excel ahead of me when it came to serving the Jamaat. He was a true and ardent devotee of the Promised Messiahas and for Khilafat-e-Ahmadiyyat. After the events of 1974, a high-ranked officer once asked him in front of me about the state of his faith in Khilafat and he responded in Punjabi that it was like metal, i.e. his faith in Khilafat was as strong as steel. During the migration of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh, he had the opportunity to accompany him in the travel up to Karachi.”

Rashid Sahib further writes, “In some of the letters which I have kept preserved of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh, he mentioned that he was a valiant soldier of Ahmadiyyat and an unsheathed sword in his love and honour for Ahmadiyyat.”

Rashid Sahib further writes, “As far as his Nawafil [voluntary prayers] during the night and bond with the Holy Quran is concerned, very few people will know because he never spoke about this. However, in both aspects he was very regular. Perhaps I too would not have come to know of this had I not shared the same room with him for four months during my severe illness in 2016. During those days, it was extremely difficult for me to stand up and sit down and he stayed with me in the same room in order to take care of me. It was during that time I witnessed him reciting the Holy Quran and offering Nawafil.”

He states, “I asked him to appoint a few people to look after me instead of him looking after me, but he asked what the need was for employing anyone else when he was there.”

Rashid Sahib further writes, “He was a very caring person. Through many efforts, he built 9-10 schools. If ever a time came when he did not have enough funds to pay for the construction of the school, he himself would work alongside the labourers and would say to them that he was doing more work than them. He never entertained the thought that he was a son of a Nawab or that he was a landowner.”

His daughter, Mahmooda Sultana Kashif Sahiba, writes, “My father’s love and loyalty for Khilafat is not hidden from anyone. Right from my birth, my father always taught us to always place our faith in God Almighty and to pray to Him in all of our dealings and that nothing can be achieved without prayer. He had great trust in God Almighty and was an extremely courageous and brave man. He did not fear anyone expect God Almighty. He was always ready to serve mankind.”

Similarly, his son, Sultan Muhammad Khan, writes, “My father did a lot of social work. He built 8 schools and helped construct another two and also donated some land for the use of two graveyards. He gave land for 8 schools to be built. He gave numerous poor people jobs and helped them.”

May God Almighty grant him His mercy and forgiveness and enable his progeny to continue his good deeds and remain attached with the Jamaat and Khilafat. As I mentioned, I shall lead the funeral prayer in absentia after the Friday Prayers.

(Translated by The Review of Religions)

(Originally published in Al Fazl International, 26 April 2019)

Emotional Eating

0

Samar Hafeez

Clinical Psychologist and Counsellor

Bangalore, India

Have you ever reached out for a bag of crisps (or chips, depending on where you’re from), a bowl of ice cream or a bar of chocolate when you are feeling bored, lonely, angry or sad?

Have you ever indulged in any food without even realising what it was? Have you ever noticed anyone eating excessively when they are out of sorts or when an unpleasant experience or argument has passed?

Most of us have gone through such instances at some point in our lives wherein we have eaten to soothe our feelings. Food can be a distractor, but eating does not solve the problem that caused discomfort or distress in the first place.

When things get rough and stressful, people oft en turn to food for comfort and this type of eating is referred to as emotional eating, which simply means that your emotions, not your body, dictate and govern when and how much you eat.

Most of the time, people use food to deal with negative feelings, this usually includes a desire to distract oneself from a disagreeable or unpleasant emotional scenario. Emotions ranging from stress, sadness, frustration, anger, anxiety, embarrassment and regret all encourage you to eat emotionally.

Sometimes, it is life’s major stressors, but most of the times, it can be small day to day upsetting situations that cause someone to gravitate towards “comfort foods” (foods that are consumed to obtain and sustain a specific feeling) and people use such foods to soothe their riled up emotions.

People who eat in response to stress usually consume high fat and sugary foods. We all at some point have felt the bliss aft er eating chocolate or an ice cream. Have you ever wondered why? Research indicates that high fat and sugary foods activate chemicals in the body that give a sense of contentment and joy. According to psychological research, any behaviour that is positively reinforced or rewarded is more likely to be repeated and sustained.

Emotional eating affects both men and women, but its prevalence is higher in adolescent girls, women and in people who are overweight.

Differences between physical and emotional hunger are:

  1. Physical hunger occurs more gradually, whereas emotional hunger is sudden, impulsive and overwhelming
  2. When one is physically hungry, he or she can include any healthy foods, but when you eat to fill a void that is not related to a hungry stomach, you crave for specific comfort foods such as pizzas, burgers, fried foods, chocolates, ice creams and so on
  3. While eating in response to a physical need, one is more aware as to what one is consuming, while eating in response to emotions, a person may not actually realise this
  4. We usually stop eating when we are full – our brain signals us to stop when we are done. A person eating in response to emotions tends to crave more and more, stuffing oneself with food unless they are uncomfortably full
  5. Eating to satisfy physical hunger does not include guilt or regret, because you are simply eating to provide the body what it needs to function, but when you eat to satisfy emotional hunger, it leads to guilt and regret at the end of it. This is because deep down, one knows they have not eaten for a nutritional purpose

Causes of emotional eating

Chronic stress and anxiety tends to elevate cortisol (primary stress hormone) levels, which in turn disrupts the hunger hormone named ghrelin. This then causes one to overeat without regulating hunger and satiation signals to the brain; it also increases food cravings and reward-driven eating behaviours.

Major life changes like death of a loved one, divorce, separation, unemployment, depression and loneliness are contributing factors. In a 2012 study at Columbia University and St Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, researchers found that subjects who were sleep-deprived were attracted to unhealthy food choices than those who were not.

It’s important to note that emotional eating can put an individual at high risk for various lifestyle diseases such as hypertension, heart disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome, obesity, insomnia, diabetes, chronic acidity and constipation, high cholesterol, eating disorders and cancer.

Self-help tips to manage emotional eating

  1. Ask yourself a few mindfulness questions to increase more awareness, for instance, ask: “Why am I eating? Am I eating because I am angry, sad or bored? Do I crave for specific foods? Do I regularly stuff myself with food until uncomfortably full? Do I reward myself with food? Does food make me feel safe? Does food make me go out of control? Do other people around me use food to soothe feelings?” These questions, when answered, should give you a basic sense of realisation about your reasons to eat
  2. Food for thought: Identify emotional triggers and record them for a few days in a mood or a food journal. Rate your hunger and satiation on a 0-10 scale, and ideally, you would want to eat when your hunger is at 3-4 (mild hunger) and stop when you are at a 7-8 (comfortably full)
  3. Increase your awareness by tracking what and how you eat. Keep a track of your weight each month. Structure your shopping, include nutrient dense snacks and do not shop when hungry as you are less likely to pick healthy stuff
  4. Do not eat whilst watching television, playing video games, driving or while working. These behaviours do not help us build a healthy relationship with food
  5. Take away temptations: Clean your refrigerator and cupboards of all unnecessary comfort foods and stock it with healthy foods like fresh vegetables, fruits, grains, seeds and nuts. These help balance the vital functions within the body
  6. If you feel overwhelmed, sad or lonely, call someone (family or friend) who can make you feel better. Distract yourself; substitute it with a healthy behaviour like taking a stroll in the park, listening to relaxing and soothing tracks, engaging in a favourite hobby or watching something pleasant
  7. Engage in relaxation techniques like deep breathing meditations for ten minutes every day. Meditation helps to improve focus and mental calmness. The resulting reduction in stress will make you become more considerate and cheerful
  8. Refrain from over-scheduling your day as this can lead to exhaustion, and while we are tired, we tend to overeat. Plan Continued from page 6 your day based on priorities and do not overwork yourself. Taking breaks at home or at work helps immensely by breaking the vicious cycle of stress and fatigue

If you feel self-help strategies are not helping you any longer, then it is suggested that you to see a therapist specialising in treating eating disorders or a clinical psychologist, who can help you combat the deeper reasons behind why you eat emotionally. They will teach you skills to build a healthier relationship with food. Therapy can also identify if you have an eating disorder, which might be contributing to emotional eating.